Moderate grazing intensities modulate canopy structure that influences short-term intake rate of heifers grazing a natural grassland

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Marcelo Wallau, Fabio Neves, Nicolas Caram, Carolina Bremm, Cassiano E. Pinto, Julio K. Da Trindade, Jean Mezzalira, Paulo C. F. Carvalho
{"title":"Moderate grazing intensities modulate canopy structure that influences short-term intake rate of heifers grazing a natural grassland","authors":"Marcelo Wallau,&nbsp;Fabio Neves,&nbsp;Nicolas Caram,&nbsp;Carolina Bremm,&nbsp;Cassiano E. Pinto,&nbsp;Julio K. Da Trindade,&nbsp;Jean Mezzalira,&nbsp;Paulo C. F. Carvalho","doi":"10.1111/grs.12413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grazing management frequently relies on forage availability as an indicator of performance. However, canopy structure and composition can play an important role in foraging behavior and intake in native grasslands. Here, we aim to (1) assess the effect of grazing management on herbage biomass, tussock cover, average canopy and inter-tussock canopy height, and to (2) study the effect of these canopy structure components on short-term intake rate (STIR) and patch selectivity of beef cattle, in a native grassland in the <i>Campos</i> region in southern Brazil. Ten 1000 m<sup>2</sup> experimental units were built in five paddocks (two per paddock) managed with different herbage allowance (HA) treatments: four fixed year-round HA (1 to 4 kg dry matter [DM]/kg live weight [LW]) and one variable HA (2 and 3 kg DM/kg LW during spring and the rest of the year, respectively). The experimental units were grazed individually with four heifers during 45 min, in two grazing cycles. Before each grazing session, we assessed the total herbage mass, average and inter-tussock canopy height, and tussock cover. During the 45-min grazing sessions, we evaluated the STIR (g DM/kg LW<sup>0.75</sup>/min) and grazing time in tussock and inter-tussock strata. Increasing the HA increased the total herbage mass, canopy height and tussock cover. The STIR was maximized with herbage mass of 2200 kg DM/ha and a tussock cover of ~7%, canopy structures related with moderate grazing intensities (i.e., 2 and 3 kg DM/kg LW), which increased the selection opportunity by herbivores. Canopy structures associated with heavy (1 kg DM/kg LW) and lenient grazing intensity (4 kg DM/kg LW) determined linear decreases of 50% in STIR.</p>","PeriodicalId":56078,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Science","volume":"70 1","pages":"3-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grs.12413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grazing management frequently relies on forage availability as an indicator of performance. However, canopy structure and composition can play an important role in foraging behavior and intake in native grasslands. Here, we aim to (1) assess the effect of grazing management on herbage biomass, tussock cover, average canopy and inter-tussock canopy height, and to (2) study the effect of these canopy structure components on short-term intake rate (STIR) and patch selectivity of beef cattle, in a native grassland in the Campos region in southern Brazil. Ten 1000 m2 experimental units were built in five paddocks (two per paddock) managed with different herbage allowance (HA) treatments: four fixed year-round HA (1 to 4 kg dry matter [DM]/kg live weight [LW]) and one variable HA (2 and 3 kg DM/kg LW during spring and the rest of the year, respectively). The experimental units were grazed individually with four heifers during 45 min, in two grazing cycles. Before each grazing session, we assessed the total herbage mass, average and inter-tussock canopy height, and tussock cover. During the 45-min grazing sessions, we evaluated the STIR (g DM/kg LW0.75/min) and grazing time in tussock and inter-tussock strata. Increasing the HA increased the total herbage mass, canopy height and tussock cover. The STIR was maximized with herbage mass of 2200 kg DM/ha and a tussock cover of ~7%, canopy structures related with moderate grazing intensities (i.e., 2 and 3 kg DM/kg LW), which increased the selection opportunity by herbivores. Canopy structures associated with heavy (1 kg DM/kg LW) and lenient grazing intensity (4 kg DM/kg LW) determined linear decreases of 50% in STIR.

适度放牧强度可调节树冠结构,从而影响放牧天然草地的小母牛的短期采食率
放牧管理经常依赖于草料的可用性作为绩效指标。然而,冠层结构和组成对原生草地的觅食行为和摄食量有重要影响。在此,我们的目的是:(1) 评估放牧管理对草本生物量、草丛覆盖率、平均冠层和草丛间冠层高度的影响;(2) 研究这些冠层结构成分对肉牛短期摄食率(STIR)和斑块选择性的影响。在五个围场(每个围场两个)中建立了 10 个 1000 平方米的实验单元,采用不同的草料补贴(HA)处理方法进行管理:四个固定的全年 HA(1 至 4 千克干物质 [DM] / 千克活重 [LW])和一个可变 HA(春季和其他季节分别为 2 和 3 千克干物质 / 千克活重)。实验单元由四头小母牛分别放牧,每个放牧周期为 45 分钟。每次放牧前,我们都会评估草料总重量、平均草冠高度和草冠间高度以及草丛覆盖率。在45分钟的放牧过程中,我们评估了草丛和草丛间层的STIR(克DM/千克LW0.75/分钟)和放牧时间。增加HA可增加草料总量、冠层高度和草丛覆盖率。当草料质量为 2200 千克 DM/公顷、草丛覆盖率约为 7%、冠层结构与适度放牧强度(即 2 和 3 千克 DM/kg LW)相关时,STIR 达到最大值,这增加了食草动物的选择机会。与重度放牧(1 千克 DM/kg LW)和宽松放牧强度(4 千克 DM/kg LW)相关的冠层结构决定了 STIR 线性下降 50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grassland Science
Grassland Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Grassland Science is the official English language journal of the Japanese Society of Grassland Science. It publishes original research papers, review articles and short reports in all aspects of grassland science, with an aim of presenting and sharing knowledge, ideas and philosophies on better management and use of grasslands, forage crops and turf plants for both agricultural and non-agricultural purposes across the world. Contributions from anyone, non-members as well as members, are welcome in any of the following fields: grassland environment, landscape, ecology and systems analysis; pasture and lawn establishment, management and cultivation; grassland utilization, animal management, behavior, nutrition and production; forage conservation, processing, storage, utilization and nutritive value; physiology, morphology, pathology and entomology of plants; breeding and genetics; physicochemical property of soil, soil animals and microorganisms and plant nutrition; economics in grassland systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信