On the Utopia of The End of Alienation. Hannah Arendt (Mis)reading Simone Weil ̶ and Karl Marx

Vicky Iakovou
{"title":"On the Utopia of The End of Alienation. Hannah Arendt (Mis)reading Simone Weil ̶ and Karl Marx","authors":"Vicky Iakovou","doi":"10.25180/lj.v25i1.320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"
 The starting point of this paper is Hannah Arendt's positive comment on Simone Weil's La condition ouvrière, in The Human Condition. I first offer a brief reconstruction of Arendt's interpretation of Marx's analysis of labor which is the context in which the above-mentioned comment appears. This interpretation is based, I claim, on a (mis)reading which consists in a rather systematic blurring of the distinction between labor as a universal and irreducible human activity and labor in its historically determined capitalist form, which is the object of Marx's critique, i.e., alienated labor. Following that, I discuss Weil's construal of labor and I shed light on its affinities with the Marxian problematic. My aim is to show that Arendt's comment does not do justice to the problems that Weil addresses both with and beyond Marx.","PeriodicalId":32193,"journal":{"name":"Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v25i1.320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The starting point of this paper is Hannah Arendt's positive comment on Simone Weil's La condition ouvrière, in The Human Condition. I first offer a brief reconstruction of Arendt's interpretation of Marx's analysis of labor which is the context in which the above-mentioned comment appears. This interpretation is based, I claim, on a (mis)reading which consists in a rather systematic blurring of the distinction between labor as a universal and irreducible human activity and labor in its historically determined capitalist form, which is the object of Marx's critique, i.e., alienated labor. Following that, I discuss Weil's construal of labor and I shed light on its affinities with the Marxian problematic. My aim is to show that Arendt's comment does not do justice to the problems that Weil addresses both with and beyond Marx.
论《异化的终结》中的乌托邦。汉娜·阿伦特在读西蒙娜·薇依和卡尔·马克思
& # x0D;本文的出发点是汉娜·阿伦特在《人类状况》一书中对西蒙娜·薇依的“生存条件”的积极评价。我首先简要地重建阿伦特对马克思劳动分析的解释,这是上述评论出现的背景。我认为,这种解释是基于一种(错误的)解读,这种解读相当系统地模糊了作为普遍的、不可简化的人类活动的劳动与历史上决定的资本主义形式的劳动之间的区别,后者是马克思批判的对象,即异化劳动。接下来,我将讨论韦尔对劳动的解释,并阐明其与马克思主义问题的密切关系。我的目的是要表明,阿伦特的评论并没有公正地对待韦尔与马克思一起或在马克思之外提出的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书