The Utility of Researcher-Driven Projective and Enabling Techniques to Support Engagement in Research About Dementia Diagnosis and Post-Diagnostic Support

IF 3.9 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
L. Phillipson, M. Hevink, C. McAiney, M. Gresham, E. Conway, M. Mackowiak, D. Szczesniak, L. Smith, H. Brodaty, L. F. Low
{"title":"The Utility of Researcher-Driven Projective and Enabling Techniques to Support Engagement in Research About Dementia Diagnosis and Post-Diagnostic Support","authors":"L. Phillipson, M. Hevink, C. McAiney, M. Gresham, E. Conway, M. Mackowiak, D. Szczesniak, L. Smith, H. Brodaty, L. F. Low","doi":"10.1177/16094069231203131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research involving people with dementia has highlighted the need to improve engagement in the conduct of interviews and focus groups. Projective and enabling techniques may be useful and avoid some of the drawbacks associated with direct questioning. However, researcher-driven projective techniques have not been extensively tested in research with people with dementia. In 2019, researchers in Australia, Canada, the Netherlands and Poland received training and trialled projective and enabling techniques to collect data about dementia diagnostic and early post-diagnostic experiences. The techniques were used with a total of thirty people with dementia (aged 67–97 years) in online and face-to-face individual and dyadic interviews and a focus group. Word association activities supported brainstorming about the concepts of ‘dementia’ and ‘support’. A researcher-driven photo elicitation technique was utilised to seek responses concerning a hypothetical couple at four time points: during a diagnostic conversation, and at 1, 6 and 12-month post-diagnosis. Discussions were audio recorded and transcribed and interviewers created ‘meta’ mind maps of word associations and made reflective notes regarding participant engagement. Deductive content analysis was used to assess the value of the techniques to support a manageable, comprehensible and meaningful research experience. Word associations supported free-flowing conversations around the key research concepts. Photo elicitation techniques promoted empathy and supported personal reflections on the probable experiences and needs of the hypothetical couple. The techniques were also useful in eliciting reflections on personal experiences, societal responses to dementia, and recommendations for improving the diagnostic conversation and supports for the post-diagnostic period. Overall, the techniques appeared to lessen some of the demands of direct questioning but were not manageable or meaningful for all participants. Further research should explore the vast array of projective techniques and engage in greater co-design and tailoring of research approaches to enhance the toolkit of dementia researchers.","PeriodicalId":48220,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231203131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research involving people with dementia has highlighted the need to improve engagement in the conduct of interviews and focus groups. Projective and enabling techniques may be useful and avoid some of the drawbacks associated with direct questioning. However, researcher-driven projective techniques have not been extensively tested in research with people with dementia. In 2019, researchers in Australia, Canada, the Netherlands and Poland received training and trialled projective and enabling techniques to collect data about dementia diagnostic and early post-diagnostic experiences. The techniques were used with a total of thirty people with dementia (aged 67–97 years) in online and face-to-face individual and dyadic interviews and a focus group. Word association activities supported brainstorming about the concepts of ‘dementia’ and ‘support’. A researcher-driven photo elicitation technique was utilised to seek responses concerning a hypothetical couple at four time points: during a diagnostic conversation, and at 1, 6 and 12-month post-diagnosis. Discussions were audio recorded and transcribed and interviewers created ‘meta’ mind maps of word associations and made reflective notes regarding participant engagement. Deductive content analysis was used to assess the value of the techniques to support a manageable, comprehensible and meaningful research experience. Word associations supported free-flowing conversations around the key research concepts. Photo elicitation techniques promoted empathy and supported personal reflections on the probable experiences and needs of the hypothetical couple. The techniques were also useful in eliciting reflections on personal experiences, societal responses to dementia, and recommendations for improving the diagnostic conversation and supports for the post-diagnostic period. Overall, the techniques appeared to lessen some of the demands of direct questioning but were not manageable or meaningful for all participants. Further research should explore the vast array of projective techniques and engage in greater co-design and tailoring of research approaches to enhance the toolkit of dementia researchers.
研究人员驱动的投影和使能技术在痴呆诊断和诊断后支持研究中的应用
涉及痴呆症患者的研究突出表明,有必要提高访谈和焦点小组的参与度。投射和启用技术可能是有用的,并且避免了与直接提问相关的一些缺点。然而,研究人员驱动的投影技术尚未在痴呆症患者的研究中得到广泛的测试。2019年,澳大利亚、加拿大、荷兰和波兰的研究人员接受了培训,并试用了预测和支持技术,以收集有关痴呆症诊断和早期诊断后经验的数据。这些技术通过在线和面对面的个人和二元访谈以及焦点小组对总共30名痴呆症患者(67-97岁)进行了应用。单词联想活动支持对“痴呆症”和“支持”概念进行头脑风暴。研究人员使用了一种由研究人员驱动的照片引出技术,在四个时间点寻求对一对假设夫妇的回应:在诊断谈话期间,以及在诊断后1、6和12个月。讨论被录音并转录,采访者创建单词关联的“元”思维导图,并对参与者的参与度做反思笔记。演绎内容分析用于评估技术的价值,以支持可管理的,可理解的和有意义的研究经验。单词联想支持围绕关键研究概念的自由对话。照片引出技巧促进了同理心,并支持了对假想夫妻可能经历和需求的个人反思。这些技术还有助于引发对个人经历的反思,对痴呆症的社会反应,以及改善诊断对话的建议,并为诊断后时期提供支持。总的来说,这些技术似乎减少了一些直接提问的要求,但对所有参与者来说都不是可控的或有意义的。进一步的研究应该探索大量的投射技术,并参与更多的共同设计和定制研究方法,以增强痴呆症研究人员的工具包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
International Journal of Qualitative Methods SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal Highlights Impact Factor: 5.4 Ranked 5/110 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary – SSCI Indexed In: Clarivate Analytics: Social Science Citation Index, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and Scopus Launched In: 2002 Publication is subject to payment of an article processing charge (APC) Submit here International Journal of Qualitative Methods (IJQM) is a peer-reviewed open access journal which focuses on methodological advances, innovations, and insights in qualitative or mixed methods studies. Please see the Aims and Scope tab for further information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信