Optimising degradation and mechanical performance of additively manufactured biodegradable Fe–Mn scaffolds using design strategies based on triply periodic minimal surfaces

Q1 Engineering
Matthew S. Dargusch , Nicolas Soro , Ali Gokhan Demir , Jeffrey Venezuela , Qiang Sun , Yuan Wang , Abdalla Abdal-hay , Aya Q. Alali , Saso Ivanovski , Barbara Previtali , Damon Kent
{"title":"Optimising degradation and mechanical performance of additively manufactured biodegradable Fe–Mn scaffolds using design strategies based on triply periodic minimal surfaces","authors":"Matthew S. Dargusch ,&nbsp;Nicolas Soro ,&nbsp;Ali Gokhan Demir ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Venezuela ,&nbsp;Qiang Sun ,&nbsp;Yuan Wang ,&nbsp;Abdalla Abdal-hay ,&nbsp;Aya Q. Alali ,&nbsp;Saso Ivanovski ,&nbsp;Barbara Previtali ,&nbsp;Damon Kent","doi":"10.1016/j.smaim.2023.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Additively manufactured lattices based on triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) have attracted significant research interest from the medical industry due to their good mechanical and biomorphic properties. However, most studies have focussed on permanent metallic implants, while very little work has been undertaken on manufacturing biodegradable metal lattices. In this study, the mechanical properties and <em>in vitro</em> corrosion of selective laser melted Fe–35%Mn lattices based on gyroid, diamond and Schwarz primitive unit-cells were comprehensively evaluated to investigate the relationships between lattice type and implant performance. The gyroid-based lattices were the most readily processable scaffold design for controllable porosity and matching the CAD design. Mechanical properties were influenced by lattice geometry and pore volume. The Schwarz lattices were stronger and stiffer than other designs with the 42% porosity scaffold exhibiting the highest combination of strength and ductility, while diamond and gyroid based scaffolds had lower strength and stiffness and were more plastically compliant. The corrosion behaviour was strongly influenced by porosity, and moderately influenced by geometry and geometry-porosity interaction. At 60% porosity, the diamond lattice displayed the highest degradation rate due to an inherently high surface area-to-volume ratio. The biodegradable Fe–35Mn porous scaffolds showed a good cytocompatibility to primary human osteoblasts cells. Additive manufacturing of biodegradable Fe–Mn alloys employing TPMS lattice designs is a viable approach to optimise and customise the mechanical properties and degradation response of resorbable implants toward specific clinical applications for hard tissue orthopaedic repair.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22019,"journal":{"name":"Smart Materials in Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 127-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590183423000455/pdfft?md5=0cd70ae9e634245f56ae4c18fbc9f38d&pid=1-s2.0-S2590183423000455-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Materials in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590183423000455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Additively manufactured lattices based on triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) have attracted significant research interest from the medical industry due to their good mechanical and biomorphic properties. However, most studies have focussed on permanent metallic implants, while very little work has been undertaken on manufacturing biodegradable metal lattices. In this study, the mechanical properties and in vitro corrosion of selective laser melted Fe–35%Mn lattices based on gyroid, diamond and Schwarz primitive unit-cells were comprehensively evaluated to investigate the relationships between lattice type and implant performance. The gyroid-based lattices were the most readily processable scaffold design for controllable porosity and matching the CAD design. Mechanical properties were influenced by lattice geometry and pore volume. The Schwarz lattices were stronger and stiffer than other designs with the 42% porosity scaffold exhibiting the highest combination of strength and ductility, while diamond and gyroid based scaffolds had lower strength and stiffness and were more plastically compliant. The corrosion behaviour was strongly influenced by porosity, and moderately influenced by geometry and geometry-porosity interaction. At 60% porosity, the diamond lattice displayed the highest degradation rate due to an inherently high surface area-to-volume ratio. The biodegradable Fe–35Mn porous scaffolds showed a good cytocompatibility to primary human osteoblasts cells. Additive manufacturing of biodegradable Fe–Mn alloys employing TPMS lattice designs is a viable approach to optimise and customise the mechanical properties and degradation response of resorbable implants toward specific clinical applications for hard tissue orthopaedic repair.

Abstract Image

基于三周期最小表面设计策略的增材制造可生物降解铁锰支架的降解和力学性能优化
基于三周期极小表面(TPMS)的增材制造晶格由于其良好的力学和生物形态特性而引起了医学界的极大研究兴趣。然而,大多数研究都集中在永久性金属植入物上,而在制造可生物降解的金属晶格方面所做的工作很少。在本研究中,综合评价了基于旋转、金刚石和Schwarz原始单元格的选择性激光熔化Fe-35%Mn晶格的力学性能和体外腐蚀,以研究晶格类型与植入物性能的关系。基于陀螺仪的支架设计是最容易加工的支架设计,具有可控的孔隙度和匹配的CAD设计。力学性能受晶格几何形状和孔隙体积的影响。与其他设计相比,Schwarz晶格的强度和刚度更高,42%孔隙率的支架表现出最高的强度和延展性,而金刚石和陀螺线支架的强度和刚度较低,塑性更强。孔隙度对腐蚀行为的影响较大,几何形状和几何-孔隙相互作用对腐蚀行为的影响较小。当孔隙率为60%时,由于其固有的高表面积体积比,金刚石晶格显示出最高的降解率。可降解的Fe-35Mn多孔支架对人原代成骨细胞具有良好的细胞相容性。采用TPMS晶格设计的生物可降解Fe-Mn合金的增材制造是一种可行的方法,可以优化和定制可吸收植入物的机械性能和降解反应,从而实现硬组织骨科修复的特定临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Smart Materials in Medicine
Smart Materials in Medicine Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信