Measuring and Modeling Impacts of Gravel Road Design on Sediment Generation in the Southeastern U.S.

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
William J. Elliot, Sarah A. Lewis, Chelsea L. Cannard
{"title":"Measuring and Modeling Impacts of Gravel Road Design on Sediment Generation in the Southeastern U.S.","authors":"William J. Elliot, Sarah A. Lewis, Chelsea L. Cannard","doi":"10.13031/ja.15539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Highlights The erodibility of heavily trafficked gravel roads can be much greater than that of low volume forest roads. Improved designs of heavily trafficked gravel roads can decrease sediment generation by more than 90 percent. The WEPP Model can be successfully parameterized for high traffic gravel roads to reflect the effects of weather, road design, and topography. Abstract. The purposes of this study were to support a watershed modeling analysis by evaluating the ability to the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model to estimate sediment generated by high traffic gravel roads, and to determine the erodibility of two designs of high-traffic gravel roads. In many watersheds, the road network can be a major source of sediment. The ability to predict erosion from roads, evaluate the effects of design and management on road sedimentation, and compare sediment from roads to other sources of sediment in the watershed is an ongoing need by watershed managers. The Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model is a widely used model for predicting sediment from forest roads. There has, however, been little information published on erosion from high traffic gravel roads and WEPP applications to such roads. To evaluate road erosion predictions, a study was conducted incorporating two road designs at Fort Benning, Georgia, U.S. One design followed a common practice of starting with a native material road and adding gravel and grading as required. Erosion and rutting on the road surface were common occurrences on this type of road. The improved design was a “graded aggregate base” design, built with compacted aggregate layers. To evaluate erosion risks for these two road designs, runoff and sediment delivery were measured from ten plots ranging in size from 63 to 150 m2. Runoff depths up to 50 mm occurred from daily rainfall amounts up to nearly 60 mm, with least square mean event runoff values of 6.5 mm from unimproved plots and 14.9 mm from improved road plots. Delivered sediment ranged from zero to 18 Mg ha-1 from individual storms with least square mean amounts of 2.27 Mg ha-1 of sediment delivered from unimproved road plots compared to only 0.026 Mg ha-1 delivered from improved road design plots for a given runoff event. Hydraulic conductivity was found by calibration to be 3.0 mm h-1 for unimproved roads and 1.3 mm h-1 for improved road segments. Rill erodibility was 0.09 s m-1 for unimproved roads and 0.0008 s m-1 for improved roads, values that were greater than had been measured on road erosion studies elsewhere that were typically less than 0.0004 s m-1. The critical shear for the unimproved roads was the minimum that the WEPP model would accept, 0.0001 Pa, but was a more typical value of 1.5 Pa for the improved road segments. When applying the calibrated erodibility values to a validation data set, the Willmott indices of agreement were 0.62 and 0.82 for runoff for unimproved and improved roads, respectively, and 0.67 and 0.66 for sediment delivery from unimproved and improved roads, respectively, indicating good agreement between observed and WEPP-estimated runoff and erosion rates. A sensitivity analysis and calibration analysis found that the WEPP model was not sensitive to interrill erosion for this application. A sensitivity analysis coupled with a WEPP validation analysis showed that WEPP could incorporate weather, topography, soil, and road design features to predict sediment delivery from highly erodible road segments. The study suggests that there is a need for a simulated runoff study to determine high values of rill erodibility more precisely on unimproved high traffic roads, and that there is a need to incorporate more erodible road erodibility values into the online WEPP:Road interface for the WEPP model. The road erosion rates and effectiveness of improved road designs for reducing off-road sediment reported in this study will be useful to managers seeking to quantify and reduce road erosion rates from high-traffic gravel roads in sensitive watersheds. Keywords: Erodibility, Gravel Roads, Soil Erosion, WEPP.","PeriodicalId":29714,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the ASABE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the ASABE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/ja.15539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Highlights The erodibility of heavily trafficked gravel roads can be much greater than that of low volume forest roads. Improved designs of heavily trafficked gravel roads can decrease sediment generation by more than 90 percent. The WEPP Model can be successfully parameterized for high traffic gravel roads to reflect the effects of weather, road design, and topography. Abstract. The purposes of this study were to support a watershed modeling analysis by evaluating the ability to the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model to estimate sediment generated by high traffic gravel roads, and to determine the erodibility of two designs of high-traffic gravel roads. In many watersheds, the road network can be a major source of sediment. The ability to predict erosion from roads, evaluate the effects of design and management on road sedimentation, and compare sediment from roads to other sources of sediment in the watershed is an ongoing need by watershed managers. The Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model is a widely used model for predicting sediment from forest roads. There has, however, been little information published on erosion from high traffic gravel roads and WEPP applications to such roads. To evaluate road erosion predictions, a study was conducted incorporating two road designs at Fort Benning, Georgia, U.S. One design followed a common practice of starting with a native material road and adding gravel and grading as required. Erosion and rutting on the road surface were common occurrences on this type of road. The improved design was a “graded aggregate base” design, built with compacted aggregate layers. To evaluate erosion risks for these two road designs, runoff and sediment delivery were measured from ten plots ranging in size from 63 to 150 m2. Runoff depths up to 50 mm occurred from daily rainfall amounts up to nearly 60 mm, with least square mean event runoff values of 6.5 mm from unimproved plots and 14.9 mm from improved road plots. Delivered sediment ranged from zero to 18 Mg ha-1 from individual storms with least square mean amounts of 2.27 Mg ha-1 of sediment delivered from unimproved road plots compared to only 0.026 Mg ha-1 delivered from improved road design plots for a given runoff event. Hydraulic conductivity was found by calibration to be 3.0 mm h-1 for unimproved roads and 1.3 mm h-1 for improved road segments. Rill erodibility was 0.09 s m-1 for unimproved roads and 0.0008 s m-1 for improved roads, values that were greater than had been measured on road erosion studies elsewhere that were typically less than 0.0004 s m-1. The critical shear for the unimproved roads was the minimum that the WEPP model would accept, 0.0001 Pa, but was a more typical value of 1.5 Pa for the improved road segments. When applying the calibrated erodibility values to a validation data set, the Willmott indices of agreement were 0.62 and 0.82 for runoff for unimproved and improved roads, respectively, and 0.67 and 0.66 for sediment delivery from unimproved and improved roads, respectively, indicating good agreement between observed and WEPP-estimated runoff and erosion rates. A sensitivity analysis and calibration analysis found that the WEPP model was not sensitive to interrill erosion for this application. A sensitivity analysis coupled with a WEPP validation analysis showed that WEPP could incorporate weather, topography, soil, and road design features to predict sediment delivery from highly erodible road segments. The study suggests that there is a need for a simulated runoff study to determine high values of rill erodibility more precisely on unimproved high traffic roads, and that there is a need to incorporate more erodible road erodibility values into the online WEPP:Road interface for the WEPP model. The road erosion rates and effectiveness of improved road designs for reducing off-road sediment reported in this study will be useful to managers seeking to quantify and reduce road erosion rates from high-traffic gravel roads in sensitive watersheds. Keywords: Erodibility, Gravel Roads, Soil Erosion, WEPP.
美国东南部砾石道路设计对泥沙产生的影响的测量和建模
交通繁忙的砾石道路的可蚀性可能比低容量的森林道路大得多。经过改进的交通繁忙的砾石路设计可以减少90%以上的泥沙生成。WEPP模型可以成功地对高流量砾石道路进行参数化,以反映天气、道路设计和地形的影响。摘要本研究的目的是通过评估水侵蚀预测项目(WEPP)模型估算高流量砾石道路产生的泥沙的能力来支持流域建模分析,并确定两种高流量砾石道路设计的可蚀性。在许多流域,道路网可能是沉积物的主要来源。预测道路侵蚀,评估设计和管理对道路沉积的影响,并将道路沉积物与流域内其他沉积物来源进行比较的能力是流域管理人员不断需要的。水侵蚀预测工程(WEPP)模型是目前广泛应用的森林道路泥沙预测模型。然而,关于高流量砾石道路的侵蚀和WEPP在这类道路上的应用的信息很少。为了评估道路侵蚀预测,在美国乔治亚州本宁堡进行了一项研究,其中包括两种道路设计。一种设计遵循了通常的做法,从天然材料道路开始,并根据需要添加砾石和分级。在这种类型的道路上,路面的侵蚀和车辙是常见的。改进后的设计是一个“分级骨料基础”设计,用密实的骨料层建造。为了评估这两种道路设计的侵蚀风险,我们测量了10个地块的径流和泥沙输送,面积从63到150平方米不等。日降雨量接近60毫米,径流深度达到50毫米,未改善地块的最小二乘平均径流值为6.5毫米,改善道路地块的最小二乘平均径流值为14.9毫米。在给定的径流事件中,单个风暴带来的沉积物从0到18 Mg ha-1不等,未改善的道路地块带来的沉积物最小二乘平均值为2.27 Mg ha-1,而改善的道路设计地块带来的沉积物仅为0.026 Mg ha-1。通过校准发现,未改善路段的水力传导率为3.0 mm h-1,改善路段的水力传导率为1.3 mm h-1。未改善道路的细沟可蚀性为0.09 s m-1,改善道路的细沟可蚀性为0.0008 s m-1,这些值大于其他地方道路侵蚀研究中测量到的值,这些研究通常小于0.0004 s m-1。未改善路段的临界剪切值是WEPP模型所能接受的最小值,为0.0001 Pa,而改善路段的临界剪切值更为典型,为1.5 Pa。当将校准的可蚀性值应用于验证数据集时,未改善和改善道路的径流Willmott一致性指数分别为0.62和0.82,未改善和改善道路的泥沙输送分别为0.67和0.66,表明观测到的径流和侵蚀率与wepp估计的吻合良好。灵敏度分析和校准分析发现,WEPP模型对该应用的细沟侵蚀不敏感。结合WEPP验证分析的敏感性分析表明,WEPP可以结合天气、地形、土壤和道路设计特征来预测高度易侵蚀路段的沉积物输送。研究表明,有必要进行模拟径流研究,以更精确地确定未改善的高交通道路上的细沟可蚀性的高值,并且有必要将更多可蚀性的道路可蚀性值纳入WEPP模型的在线WEPP: road界面。本研究报告的道路侵蚀率和改善道路设计减少越野沉积物的有效性将有助于管理人员量化和减少敏感流域高流量砾石道路的道路侵蚀率。关键词:可蚀性;碎石路面;土壤侵蚀;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信