Air quality by inhalable particulate matter (PM10) in five urban centers in South America

Thiago Souza Silveira, Renata Reis dos Santos, Fernando Mussa Abujamra Aith, Nelson Gouveia
{"title":"Air quality by inhalable particulate matter (PM10) in five urban centers in South America","authors":"Thiago Souza Silveira, Renata Reis dos Santos, Fernando Mussa Abujamra Aith, Nelson Gouveia","doi":"10.5327/z2176-94781628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims to analyze the records of the inhalable particulate matter PM10 from 2002 to 2018 in the cities of Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Porto Alegre (Brazil), Montevideo (Uruguay), and Buenos Aires (Argentina), verifying if they were within the established limits and if the air quality reports, produced in each city, were contextualizing air pollution with relevant legislation and geographic factors. For this, we downloaded the air quality reports from websites of environmental agencies that, in accordance with their laws, are obligated to publish them. After reading, it was pointed out: the publication formats, if geographic factors were addressed in air quality analyses, the legal bases for the diagnosis, as well as which of them were more tolerant with air pollution, and the frequency they published their data and their justifications. Next, a comparison of the annual average and maximum in 24 hours PM10 records was performed. Therefore, we found that São Paulo presented the most complete document and Buenos Aires the least comprehensive. Rio de Janeiro exceeded PM10 tolerance limits several times, and Montevideo has the least polluted air quality. Only Buenos Aires did not address geographic factors as a form of analysis or suggestions. Finally, it is suggested that Porto Alegre and Buenos Aires should increase their data collection networks. The poor performance of some cities make it difficult to accomplish the task to transform them in more sustainable and healthy places.","PeriodicalId":352759,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5327/z2176-94781628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims to analyze the records of the inhalable particulate matter PM10 from 2002 to 2018 in the cities of Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Porto Alegre (Brazil), Montevideo (Uruguay), and Buenos Aires (Argentina), verifying if they were within the established limits and if the air quality reports, produced in each city, were contextualizing air pollution with relevant legislation and geographic factors. For this, we downloaded the air quality reports from websites of environmental agencies that, in accordance with their laws, are obligated to publish them. After reading, it was pointed out: the publication formats, if geographic factors were addressed in air quality analyses, the legal bases for the diagnosis, as well as which of them were more tolerant with air pollution, and the frequency they published their data and their justifications. Next, a comparison of the annual average and maximum in 24 hours PM10 records was performed. Therefore, we found that São Paulo presented the most complete document and Buenos Aires the least comprehensive. Rio de Janeiro exceeded PM10 tolerance limits several times, and Montevideo has the least polluted air quality. Only Buenos Aires did not address geographic factors as a form of analysis or suggestions. Finally, it is suggested that Porto Alegre and Buenos Aires should increase their data collection networks. The poor performance of some cities make it difficult to accomplish the task to transform them in more sustainable and healthy places.
南美洲五个城市中心可吸入颗粒物(PM10)的空气质量
本研究旨在分析2002年至2018年里约热内卢、圣保罗、阿雷格里港(巴西)、蒙得维的亚(乌拉圭)和布宜诺斯艾利斯(阿根廷)等城市可吸入颗粒物PM10的记录,验证它们是否在既定限制范围内,以及每个城市制作的空气质量报告是否将空气污染与相关立法和地理因素联系起来。为此,我们从环保部门的网站上下载了空气质量报告,根据相关法律规定,环保部门有义务公布空气质量报告。阅读后,有人指出:出版格式,如果在空气质量分析中考虑地理因素,诊断的法律依据,以及他们中哪一个对空气污染更宽容,以及他们发表数据的频率和理由。接下来,对24小时PM10记录的年平均值和最大值进行了比较。因此,我们发现圣保罗提供的文件最完整,而布宜诺斯艾利斯提供的文件最不全面。里约热内卢的PM10曾多次超标,蒙得维的亚的空气污染程度最低。只有布宜诺斯艾利斯没有将地理因素作为一种分析或建议的形式。最后,建议阿雷格里港和布宜诺斯艾利斯应增加其数据收集网络。一些城市的表现不佳,使得在更可持续、更健康的地方完成改造的任务变得困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信