What matters more? An investigation of factors influencing student satisfaction in transnational higher education

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
John P. Haupt, Elham Chelabi
{"title":"What matters more? An investigation of factors influencing student satisfaction in transnational higher education","authors":"John P. Haupt, Elham Chelabi","doi":"10.1080/03057925.2023.2268507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTGiven the growth and evolution in transnational higher education models, the present study investigates students’ perceptions of service quality in dual-degree programmes. It also compares how different programme components and student demographic characteristics influence their overall satisfaction with their programmes. A survey was administered to 117 recent graduates from dual-degree programmes in Cambodia, Indonesia, and Jordan. Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics, a principal components analysis, and a linear regression model. The findings indicate that students perceived their learning experiences and available resources to be of quality and were satisfied with their programmes. Regression results showed that higher ratings for local partner university professors, perceived learning and development, technology and resources, and plans to be internationally mobile upon graduation significantly predicted student satisfaction. These findings have implications for the study of transnational higher education and the importance of considering programme models and for universities with transnational higher education programmes.KEYWORDS: Service qualitystudent satisfactiontransnational higher educationdual-degrees AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. They would also like to acknowledge Dr. Jenny J Lee and Xiaojie Li, who supported instrument development and data collection for this study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly, so due to the nature of the research supporting data is not available.","PeriodicalId":47586,"journal":{"name":"Compare-A Journal of Comparative and International Education","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compare-A Journal of Comparative and International Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2023.2268507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTGiven the growth and evolution in transnational higher education models, the present study investigates students’ perceptions of service quality in dual-degree programmes. It also compares how different programme components and student demographic characteristics influence their overall satisfaction with their programmes. A survey was administered to 117 recent graduates from dual-degree programmes in Cambodia, Indonesia, and Jordan. Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics, a principal components analysis, and a linear regression model. The findings indicate that students perceived their learning experiences and available resources to be of quality and were satisfied with their programmes. Regression results showed that higher ratings for local partner university professors, perceived learning and development, technology and resources, and plans to be internationally mobile upon graduation significantly predicted student satisfaction. These findings have implications for the study of transnational higher education and the importance of considering programme models and for universities with transnational higher education programmes.KEYWORDS: Service qualitystudent satisfactiontransnational higher educationdual-degrees AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. They would also like to acknowledge Dr. Jenny J Lee and Xiaojie Li, who supported instrument development and data collection for this study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly, so due to the nature of the research supporting data is not available.
什么更重要?影响跨国高等教育学生满意度的因素调查
摘要基于跨国高等教育模式的成长与演变,本研究探讨学生对双学位课程服务品质的认知。它还比较了不同的课程组成部分和学生人口特征如何影响他们对课程的总体满意度。对117名刚从柬埔寨、印度尼西亚和约旦双学位课程毕业的学生进行了调查。使用描述性统计、主成分分析和线性回归模型对调查数据进行分析。调查结果表明,学生认为他们的学习经验和可用资源是高质量的,并对他们的课程感到满意。回归结果显示,本地合作大学教授、感知学习和发展、技术和资源以及毕业后国际流动计划的评分较高,显著预测了学生满意度。这些发现对跨国高等教育的研究和考虑方案模式的重要性以及对拥有跨国高等教育方案的大学具有影响。关键词:服务质量学生满意度跨国高等教育双学位致谢作者要感谢两位匿名审稿人对手稿早期草稿的有益评论。他们还要感谢Jenny J Lee博士和Xiaojie Li博士,他们为本研究的仪器开发和数据收集提供了支持。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明本研究的参与者没有书面同意公开分享他们的数据,因此由于研究的性质,无法获得支持数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Comparative and international studies in education enjoy new popularity. They illuminate the effects of globalisation and post-structural thinking on learning for professional and personal lives. Compare publishes such research as it relates to educational development and change in different parts of the world. It seeks analyses of educational discourse, policy and practice across disciplines, and their implications for teaching, learning and management. The editors welcome papers which reflect on practice from early childhood to the end of adult life, review processes of comparative and international enquiry and report on empirical studies. All papers should include a comparative dimension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信