{"title":"Turkey in between the EU and China: from Europeanization to cooperation with China","authors":"Gözde Yilmaz, Nilgün Eliküçük Yıldırım","doi":"10.1080/14683857.2023.2269776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTTurkey has been on the path of EU membership since the 2000s, and the democratization process was well underway during the initial years of its candidacy. However, this trend was reversed substantially, with Turkey growing increasingly authoritarian during the 2010s. This substantial democratic backsliding has led to increasing authoritarian cooperation with the authoritarian powers on the rise, one of which is China, whose increasing engagement and cooperation with Turkey marked an alternative gravity centre for Turkey to be pulled by. This article argues that Turkey, in line with the worsening domestic authoritarianism, has been engaging with the authoritarian powers for survival rather than engaging with the EU, which provided legitimacy to the rule of the AKP during the initial years of its rule.KEYWORDS: Authoritarian cooperationChinaEuropean UnionEuropeanizationTurkey Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Turkey was the voice of Uyghurs on international platforms until 2015 as the home of the largest Uyghur diaspora outside Central Asia. However, increasing economic and political cooperation between Turkey and China led to Turkey remaining silent regarding China’s persecution of the Uyghurs, despite the Uyghurs being a Turkic Muslim community (Öniş and Yalikun Citation2021, 522). Additionally, during Erdoğan’s visit to China in 2017, Turkey and China signed an extradition treaty to restrict cross-border criminal activities. Although it has not been ratified by the Turkish parliament, there are some cases indicating that Turkey has already applied rendition, detention, and surveillance to its Uyghur population (Radio Free Asia Citation2019). Hence, Turkey’s turning into an authoritarian regime not only facilitated its cooperation with China but also caused Turkey to abandon the Uyghurs.Additional informationNotes on contributorsGözde YilmazGözde Yilmaz is a Jean Monnet Fellow at the European University Institute and professor in Atılım University. Her research interests are norm and authoritarian diffusion, external Europeanization, EU-Turkey-China relations, minority rights and non-discrimination in the EU and Turkey and Westerm Balkans.Nilgün Eliküçük YıldırımNilgün Eliküçük Yıldırım is an associate professor in the department of international relations at Atılım University in Ankara. Her research interests include Chinese foreign policy, Turkey-China Relations, IPE, social psychology.","PeriodicalId":51736,"journal":{"name":"Southeast European and Black Sea Studies","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeast European and Black Sea Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2023.2269776","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTTurkey has been on the path of EU membership since the 2000s, and the democratization process was well underway during the initial years of its candidacy. However, this trend was reversed substantially, with Turkey growing increasingly authoritarian during the 2010s. This substantial democratic backsliding has led to increasing authoritarian cooperation with the authoritarian powers on the rise, one of which is China, whose increasing engagement and cooperation with Turkey marked an alternative gravity centre for Turkey to be pulled by. This article argues that Turkey, in line with the worsening domestic authoritarianism, has been engaging with the authoritarian powers for survival rather than engaging with the EU, which provided legitimacy to the rule of the AKP during the initial years of its rule.KEYWORDS: Authoritarian cooperationChinaEuropean UnionEuropeanizationTurkey Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Turkey was the voice of Uyghurs on international platforms until 2015 as the home of the largest Uyghur diaspora outside Central Asia. However, increasing economic and political cooperation between Turkey and China led to Turkey remaining silent regarding China’s persecution of the Uyghurs, despite the Uyghurs being a Turkic Muslim community (Öniş and Yalikun Citation2021, 522). Additionally, during Erdoğan’s visit to China in 2017, Turkey and China signed an extradition treaty to restrict cross-border criminal activities. Although it has not been ratified by the Turkish parliament, there are some cases indicating that Turkey has already applied rendition, detention, and surveillance to its Uyghur population (Radio Free Asia Citation2019). Hence, Turkey’s turning into an authoritarian regime not only facilitated its cooperation with China but also caused Turkey to abandon the Uyghurs.Additional informationNotes on contributorsGözde YilmazGözde Yilmaz is a Jean Monnet Fellow at the European University Institute and professor in Atılım University. Her research interests are norm and authoritarian diffusion, external Europeanization, EU-Turkey-China relations, minority rights and non-discrimination in the EU and Turkey and Westerm Balkans.Nilgün Eliküçük YıldırımNilgün Eliküçük Yıldırım is an associate professor in the department of international relations at Atılım University in Ankara. Her research interests include Chinese foreign policy, Turkey-China Relations, IPE, social psychology.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to establish a line of communication with these regions of Europe. Previously isolated from the European mainstream, the Balkan and Black Sea regions are in need of serious comparative study as are the individual countries, no longer "at the edge" of Europe. The principal disciplines covered by the journal are politics, political economy, international relations and modern history; other disciplinary approaches are accepted as appropriate. The journal will take both an academic and also a more practical policy-oriented approach and hopes to compensate for the serious information deficit on the countries under consideration.