Lessons learned: audit of the record-keeping quality of a tertiary hospital’s mammography service

Amaka Obiageli Nnamani, Nneka Ifeyinwa Iloanusi, Ngozi Regina Dim, Nwamaka Ngozika Lasebikan  , Chidimma Nnonyelum  Okwor, Ifeoma Joy Okoye
{"title":"Lessons learned: audit of the record-keeping quality of a tertiary hospital’s mammography service","authors":"Amaka Obiageli Nnamani, Nneka Ifeyinwa Iloanusi, Ngozi Regina Dim, Nwamaka Ngozika Lasebikan  , Chidimma Nnonyelum  Okwor, Ifeoma Joy Okoye","doi":"10.4081/acbr.2023.343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breast cancer is the most common cancer worldwide. In diagnostic centers offering mammography, periodic audit of medical archived procedures is an important component of a quality assurance program; this ensures optimal follow-up of positive cases and establishment of measures to combat any deficiencies. The study aimed to audit the record-keeping of the mammography service in a tertiary institution, with a view to improving its efficiency. A retrospective audit of request forms, questionnaires, mammograms, and reports of 1,098 women who had mammography at the radiology department of a public tertiary hospital between 2011 and 2018. An internal audit of records evaluated the completeness of clinical information on the request forms, questionnaires, accuracy of diagnosis, and state of stored mammographic films, years later. Microsoft Excel and SPSS version 23 were used for the analysis of descriptive and inferential statistics, respectively. Two hundred and thirty (21%) and 791 (72%) women had screening and diagnostic mammography, respectively; their ages ranged from 31 to 85 years. Indication of study was not stated on 73 (7%) request forms and 281 (26%) request forms were improperly filled. There were 52 (4.7%) women not clerked with the questionnaire, while 158 (14%) had no clinical breast examination prior to imaging. One hundred and thirty (12%) mammograms were damaged, while 2 were missing and not reviewed. Our study revealed a significant lapse in quality of our mammography record archival system. Evidence obtained helped institute necessary measures in place for digitization and quality control of mammography services.","PeriodicalId":484760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of clinical and biomedical research","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of clinical and biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/acbr.2023.343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer worldwide. In diagnostic centers offering mammography, periodic audit of medical archived procedures is an important component of a quality assurance program; this ensures optimal follow-up of positive cases and establishment of measures to combat any deficiencies. The study aimed to audit the record-keeping of the mammography service in a tertiary institution, with a view to improving its efficiency. A retrospective audit of request forms, questionnaires, mammograms, and reports of 1,098 women who had mammography at the radiology department of a public tertiary hospital between 2011 and 2018. An internal audit of records evaluated the completeness of clinical information on the request forms, questionnaires, accuracy of diagnosis, and state of stored mammographic films, years later. Microsoft Excel and SPSS version 23 were used for the analysis of descriptive and inferential statistics, respectively. Two hundred and thirty (21%) and 791 (72%) women had screening and diagnostic mammography, respectively; their ages ranged from 31 to 85 years. Indication of study was not stated on 73 (7%) request forms and 281 (26%) request forms were improperly filled. There were 52 (4.7%) women not clerked with the questionnaire, while 158 (14%) had no clinical breast examination prior to imaging. One hundred and thirty (12%) mammograms were damaged, while 2 were missing and not reviewed. Our study revealed a significant lapse in quality of our mammography record archival system. Evidence obtained helped institute necessary measures in place for digitization and quality control of mammography services.
经验教训:审计三级医院乳房x光检查服务的记录保存质量
乳腺癌是世界上最常见的癌症。在提供乳房x光检查的诊断中心,定期审核医疗档案程序是质量保证计划的重要组成部分;这确保对积极案例采取最佳后续行动,并制定措施克服任何缺陷。本研究旨在审核一所高等教育机构乳房x光检查服务的记录保存情况,以期提高其效率。对2011年至2018年在一家公立三级医院放射科接受乳房x光检查的1098名女性的申请表、问卷、乳房x光照片和报告进行了回顾性审计。内部审计记录评估了临床信息的完整性,调查表,诊断的准确性,以及多年后乳房x光片的保存状态。描述性统计采用Microsoft Excel,推断性统计采用SPSS version 23进行分析。分别有230名(21%)和791名(72%)妇女接受了筛查和诊断性乳房x光检查;他们的年龄从31岁到85岁不等。73份(7%)申请表未注明研究指示,281份(26%)申请表填写不当。有52名(4.7%)妇女没有填写问卷,158名(14%)妇女在影像学检查前没有进行临床乳房检查。130张(12%)乳房x光片受损,2张缺失且未复查。我们的研究揭示了乳房x光记录档案系统质量的重大失误。获得的证据有助于制定必要的措施,以实现乳房x光检查服务的数字化和质量控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信