Knowledge management used in technology operations for innovations and value creation

James C. Rice, Michelle Reeves
{"title":"Knowledge management used in technology operations for innovations and value creation","authors":"James C. Rice, Michelle Reeves","doi":"10.36965/ojakm.2023.11(2)44-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge Management (KM) facilitates organizations with critical business decisions for competitive advantage. However, organizational leaders and technology teams still struggle with understanding how KM strategies and practices can help the company with innovations and business value additions. Therefore, this qualitative descriptive case study was performed in 2021 to examine KM’s capability maturity in creating business value and innovation for a large financial institution in Texas, headquartered in Virginia. The population sample consisted of one director, two Technology Operations Center Managers (TOCMs), and 10 power users (non-managers). The problem addressed by this study was understanding and describing the KM capability maturity and its relationship with leadership’s perceptions of KM value to determine how different features have impacted value creation and innovation. The two guiding research questions were: 1) How do KM administrators and senior leadership understand and describe KM related to creating business value and innovation in financial technology operations? 2) Why do TOCMs and power users understand and use KM the way they do? The conceptual framework was KM, business value, and innovation. Tools like Capability Maturity Models of Knowledge Management (CMM of KM) helped the researchers and TOC participants assess their current level of KM use and areas for improvement. Data collection was completed through a qualitative questionnaire after eligibility checks against company intranet profiles. Data analysis used NVivo 1.5 coding to identify themes from the TOCM participants’ perspectives to compare with archival and historical data. This study’s results contributed to the existing body of knowledge about KM from a technology operations perspective, including gaps in alignment and communication.","PeriodicalId":484625,"journal":{"name":"The Online journal of applied knowledge management","volume":"216 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Online journal of applied knowledge management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36965/ojakm.2023.11(2)44-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge Management (KM) facilitates organizations with critical business decisions for competitive advantage. However, organizational leaders and technology teams still struggle with understanding how KM strategies and practices can help the company with innovations and business value additions. Therefore, this qualitative descriptive case study was performed in 2021 to examine KM’s capability maturity in creating business value and innovation for a large financial institution in Texas, headquartered in Virginia. The population sample consisted of one director, two Technology Operations Center Managers (TOCMs), and 10 power users (non-managers). The problem addressed by this study was understanding and describing the KM capability maturity and its relationship with leadership’s perceptions of KM value to determine how different features have impacted value creation and innovation. The two guiding research questions were: 1) How do KM administrators and senior leadership understand and describe KM related to creating business value and innovation in financial technology operations? 2) Why do TOCMs and power users understand and use KM the way they do? The conceptual framework was KM, business value, and innovation. Tools like Capability Maturity Models of Knowledge Management (CMM of KM) helped the researchers and TOC participants assess their current level of KM use and areas for improvement. Data collection was completed through a qualitative questionnaire after eligibility checks against company intranet profiles. Data analysis used NVivo 1.5 coding to identify themes from the TOCM participants’ perspectives to compare with archival and historical data. This study’s results contributed to the existing body of knowledge about KM from a technology operations perspective, including gaps in alignment and communication.
知识管理在技术运作中的应用,以促进创新和价值创造
知识管理(KM)帮助组织做出关键的商业决策以获得竞争优势。然而,组织领导者和技术团队仍然在努力理解知识管理策略和实践如何帮助公司进行创新和增加业务价值。因此,本定性描述性案例研究于2021年进行,旨在为总部位于弗吉尼亚州的德克萨斯州一家大型金融机构检查KM在创造业务价值和创新方面的能力成熟度。总体样本包括一名主管、两名技术运营中心经理(TOCMs)和10名高级用户(非管理人员)。本研究解决的问题是理解和描述知识管理能力成熟度及其与领导对知识管理价值认知的关系,以确定不同特征如何影响价值创造和创新。两个指导性研究问题是:1)知识管理人员和高级领导层如何理解和描述与金融科技运营中创造商业价值和创新相关的知识管理?2)为什么tocm和高级用户以他们的方式理解和使用KM ?概念框架是知识管理、业务价值和创新。知识管理能力成熟度模型(Capability Maturity Models of Knowledge Management, CMM of KM)等工具帮助研究人员和TOC参与者评估他们目前的知识管理使用水平和需要改进的领域。数据收集是通过对公司内部网档案进行资格检查后的定性问卷来完成的。数据分析使用NVivo 1.5编码从TOCM参与者的角度识别主题,并与档案和历史数据进行比较。本研究的结果从技术运营的角度对现有的知识体系做出了贡献,包括一致性和沟通方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信