Biological control potential of a laboratory selected generalist parasitoid versus a co-evolved specialist parasitoid against the invasive Drosophila suzukii

IF 3.5 2区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Oscar Istas, Marianna Szűcs
{"title":"Biological control potential of a laboratory selected generalist parasitoid versus a co-evolved specialist parasitoid against the invasive Drosophila suzukii","authors":"Oscar Istas,&nbsp;Marianna Szűcs","doi":"10.1111/eva.13605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A few generations of laboratory selection can increase the developmental success of native parasitoids on invasive targets. However, for this approach to be used more widely for biological control, we need to understand if the improved performance of native species, achieved under artificial laboratory conditions, translates to improved control in more natural environments. It is also unknown what the biocontrol potential of laboratory selected generalist native parasitoids may be compared to co-evolved specialists that are typically introduced for biological control of invasive species. To assess how rearing in artificial diet affected host finding ability in natural hosts, we used laboratory selected (adapted) and nonadapted populations of the generalist native parasitoid <i>Trichopria drosophilae</i> to parasitize the invasive fly, <i>Drosophila suzukii</i> in three different fruit types. In a separate experiment, we compared the effectiveness of adapted and nonadapted populations of <i>T. drosophilae</i> in raspberries with a co-evolved specialist larval parasitoid <i>Ganaspis brasiliensis</i> from Asia that was recently approved for release in the USA. More adult parasitoids emerged in each fruit type of the adapted compared to the nonadapted population of <i>T. drosophilae</i>. <i>D. suzukii</i> emergence rates were reduced on average by 85% by the adapted <i>T. drosophilae</i> population indicating that the artificial rearing conditions did not significantly impair the ability of parasitoids to locate and attack hosts in natural hosts. The specialist <i>G. brasiliensis</i> had higher adult emergence than the adapted population of <i>T. drosophilae</i>; however, both parasitoid species were able to reduce <i>D. suzukii</i> populations to the same extent. These results show that despite the lower developmental success of the laboratory selected <i>T. drosophilae</i>, they killed the same proportion of <i>D. suzukii</i> as <i>G. brasiliensis</i> when host choice was restricted. In nature, where host choices are available, specialist and generalist parasitoids will be unlikely to exhibit the same biocontrol potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":168,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Applications","volume":"16 11","pages":"1819-1829"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eva.13605","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Applications","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eva.13605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A few generations of laboratory selection can increase the developmental success of native parasitoids on invasive targets. However, for this approach to be used more widely for biological control, we need to understand if the improved performance of native species, achieved under artificial laboratory conditions, translates to improved control in more natural environments. It is also unknown what the biocontrol potential of laboratory selected generalist native parasitoids may be compared to co-evolved specialists that are typically introduced for biological control of invasive species. To assess how rearing in artificial diet affected host finding ability in natural hosts, we used laboratory selected (adapted) and nonadapted populations of the generalist native parasitoid Trichopria drosophilae to parasitize the invasive fly, Drosophila suzukii in three different fruit types. In a separate experiment, we compared the effectiveness of adapted and nonadapted populations of T. drosophilae in raspberries with a co-evolved specialist larval parasitoid Ganaspis brasiliensis from Asia that was recently approved for release in the USA. More adult parasitoids emerged in each fruit type of the adapted compared to the nonadapted population of T. drosophilae. D. suzukii emergence rates were reduced on average by 85% by the adapted T. drosophilae population indicating that the artificial rearing conditions did not significantly impair the ability of parasitoids to locate and attack hosts in natural hosts. The specialist G. brasiliensis had higher adult emergence than the adapted population of T. drosophilae; however, both parasitoid species were able to reduce D. suzukii populations to the same extent. These results show that despite the lower developmental success of the laboratory selected T. drosophilae, they killed the same proportion of D. suzukii as G. brasiliensis when host choice was restricted. In nature, where host choices are available, specialist and generalist parasitoids will be unlikely to exhibit the same biocontrol potential.

Abstract Image

实验室选择的通才寄生蜂与共同进化的专才寄生蜂对入侵的铃木果蝇的生物控制潜力
摘要几代的实验室选择可以提高原生寄生蜂在入侵靶点上的发育成功率。然而,为了使这种方法更广泛地用于生物防治,我们需要了解在人工实验室条件下获得的本地物种的改善性能是否转化为在更自然的环境中改善的控制。同样未知的是,实验室选择的多面手原生拟寄生虫的生物防治潜力可能与共同进化的专科寄生虫相比,后者通常是为了生物防治入侵物种而引入的。为了评估人工饲养对天然寄主寻找寄主能力的影响,我们利用实验室选择的(适应的)和未适应的多面体原生拟寄主果蝇毛蛾(Trichopria drosophia suzukii)寄生在三种不同水果类型的入侵果蝇上。在另一项单独的实验中,我们比较了覆盆子中适应和非适应的果蝇种群的有效性,以及最近在美国被批准释放的来自亚洲的共同进化的特殊幼虫巴西杉。与未适应的果蝇种群相比,适应的果蝇种群在各果型中出现了更多的成虫。结果表明,人工饲养条件对拟寄生物在自然寄主中定位和攻击寄主的能力没有明显影响。巴西褐家蝇专科种群的成虫羽化率高于果蝇适应种群;然而,两种拟寄生物都能在相同程度上减少铃木氏夜蛾种群。这些结果表明,尽管实验室选择的果蝇的发育成功率较低,但在限制寄主选择的情况下,它们杀死苏氏夜蛾的比例与巴西夜蛾相同。在可以选择宿主的自然环境中,专门型和通才型拟寄生虫不太可能表现出同样的生物防治潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolutionary Applications
Evolutionary Applications 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Applications is a fully peer reviewed open access journal. It publishes papers that utilize concepts from evolutionary biology to address biological questions of health, social and economic relevance. Papers are expected to employ evolutionary concepts or methods to make contributions to areas such as (but not limited to): medicine, agriculture, forestry, exploitation and management (fisheries and wildlife), aquaculture, conservation biology, environmental sciences (including climate change and invasion biology), microbiology, and toxicology. All taxonomic groups are covered from microbes, fungi, plants and animals. In order to better serve the community, we also now strongly encourage submissions of papers making use of modern molecular and genetic methods (population and functional genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenetics, quantitative genetics, association and linkage mapping) to address important questions in any of these disciplines and in an applied evolutionary framework. Theoretical, empirical, synthesis or perspective papers are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信