T2 Hamstring Muscle Activation during the Single-Leg Roman Chair: Impact of Prior Injury

Bas Van Hooren, Juan Vicente-Mampel, Francisco Piqueras-Sanchiz, Luis Baraja-Vegas, Iker Javier Bautista
{"title":"T2 Hamstring Muscle Activation during the Single-Leg Roman Chair: Impact of Prior Injury","authors":"Bas Van Hooren, Juan Vicente-Mampel, Francisco Piqueras-Sanchiz, Luis Baraja-Vegas, Iker Javier Bautista","doi":"10.1249/esm.0000000000000015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction/Purpose Previous studies have shown inhibition of previously injured hamstrings during eccentric exercises, but it is unknown whether this effect is also present during an isometric position-control exercise such as the single-leg Roman chair hold (SLRCH). Methods This cross-sectional study investigated muscle activation during the SLRCH in individuals with prior hamstring injuries. Twelve recreationally active male soccer players and athletes performed the SLRCH with a five-repetition maximum load. Muscle activation was assessed using the transverse relaxation (T 2 ) time for the biceps femoris long and short heads (BF lh and BF sh ), semitendinosus (ST), semimembranosus, and adductor magnus and compared within and between legs. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was also quantified. Results T 2 times significantly increased for all muscles except the adductor magnus in both legs. In both legs, the ST showed a significantly larger increase in T 2 time compared with all other muscles. The BF lh showed a significantly smaller increase in T 2 time in the injured leg compared with the uninjured leg (−7.1%), whereas there were no significant differences between legs for the other muscles. Muscle CSA for any of the muscles did not significantly differ between the injured and uninjured legs. Conclusion The ST was preferentially activated during the SLRCH in both the uninjured and injured legs, but the magnitude of preferential activation was smaller (~10%) than observed previously during eccentric exercises (~17%–30%). Furthermore, the BF lh in the previously injured leg was activated less compared with the BF lh in the uninjured leg, despite no differences in muscle CSA.","PeriodicalId":72994,"journal":{"name":"Exercise, sport, & movement","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exercise, sport, & movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/esm.0000000000000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction/Purpose Previous studies have shown inhibition of previously injured hamstrings during eccentric exercises, but it is unknown whether this effect is also present during an isometric position-control exercise such as the single-leg Roman chair hold (SLRCH). Methods This cross-sectional study investigated muscle activation during the SLRCH in individuals with prior hamstring injuries. Twelve recreationally active male soccer players and athletes performed the SLRCH with a five-repetition maximum load. Muscle activation was assessed using the transverse relaxation (T 2 ) time for the biceps femoris long and short heads (BF lh and BF sh ), semitendinosus (ST), semimembranosus, and adductor magnus and compared within and between legs. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was also quantified. Results T 2 times significantly increased for all muscles except the adductor magnus in both legs. In both legs, the ST showed a significantly larger increase in T 2 time compared with all other muscles. The BF lh showed a significantly smaller increase in T 2 time in the injured leg compared with the uninjured leg (−7.1%), whereas there were no significant differences between legs for the other muscles. Muscle CSA for any of the muscles did not significantly differ between the injured and uninjured legs. Conclusion The ST was preferentially activated during the SLRCH in both the uninjured and injured legs, but the magnitude of preferential activation was smaller (~10%) than observed previously during eccentric exercises (~17%–30%). Furthermore, the BF lh in the previously injured leg was activated less compared with the BF lh in the uninjured leg, despite no differences in muscle CSA.
在单腿罗马椅中T2腿筋肌肉的激活:先前损伤的影响
先前的研究表明,在偏心运动中,先前受伤的腘绳肌有抑制作用,但尚不清楚这种作用是否也存在于等距位置控制运动中,如单腿罗马椅保持(SLRCH)。方法采用横断面研究方法,对先前有腿筋损伤的个体进行SLRCH时的肌肉激活情况进行研究。12名娱乐活动的男性足球运动员和运动员以5次最大负荷进行SLRCH。利用股二头肌长头和短头(BF lh和BF sh)、半腱肌(ST)、半膜肌和大收肌的横向松弛(t2)时间来评估肌肉激活,并比较腿内和腿间的肌肉激活。肌肉横截面积(CSA)也被量化。结果除大收肌外,两腿各肌群t2均明显增高。在两条腿中,与所有其他肌肉相比,ST显示出明显更大的t2时间增加。与未受伤的腿相比,受伤腿的BF lh在t2时间上的增加幅度明显较小(- 7.1%),而其他肌肉在两腿之间没有显著差异。任何肌肉的CSA在受伤和未受伤的腿之间没有显著差异。结论在SLRCH运动中,损伤腿和未损伤腿的ST均有优先激活,但优先激活的幅度(~10%)小于先前偏心运动时(~17% ~ 30%)。此外,与未受伤的腿相比,先前受伤腿的BF lh被激活较少,尽管肌肉CSA没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信