Intimate Partner Violence Among Brazilian Trans and Cisgender Women Living with HIV or at HIV Risk During COVID-19 Era: Another Epidemic?

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences
Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael, Emilia M. Jalil, Luciane de Souza Velasque, Ruth Khalili Friedman, Michelle Ramos, Cynthia B. Cunha, Eduardo Mesquita Peixoto, Lívia Machado de Mello Andrade, Davi Gomes Depret, Adriana Costa Gil, Dandara Costa Alcântara, Laylla Monteiro, Virginia Maria de Azevedo Oliveira Knupp, Valdiléa G. Veloso, Erin C. Wilson, Beatriz Grinsztejn
{"title":"Intimate Partner Violence Among Brazilian Trans and Cisgender Women Living with HIV or at HIV Risk During COVID-19 Era: Another Epidemic?","authors":"Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael, Emilia M. Jalil, Luciane de Souza Velasque, Ruth Khalili Friedman, Michelle Ramos, Cynthia B. Cunha, Eduardo Mesquita Peixoto, Lívia Machado de Mello Andrade, Davi Gomes Depret, Adriana Costa Gil, Dandara Costa Alcântara, Laylla Monteiro, Virginia Maria de Azevedo Oliveira Knupp, Valdiléa G. Veloso, Erin C. Wilson, Beatriz Grinsztejn","doi":"10.1089/trgh.2023.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Our study was conducted to estimate intimate partner violence (IPV) prevalence and associated factors among trans and cisgender women at risk of or living with HIV during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between May and August 2020 through telephone surveys with cisgender and trans women enrolled in two cohort studies in Rio de Janeiro. We assessed IPV employing the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale during the initial months of shelter-in-place ordinances. Regression models evaluated the factors associated with IPV for each population. Results: We surveyed 796 women, and 341 participants (47.78%) were eligible and included in the current analysis. All cisgender women and 41 (64.06%) trans women were living with HIV. Overall IPV prevalence was 27.86% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 23.34–32.88). IPV was 63% higher among trans women than among cisgender women (prevalence ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.14–2.34, p=0.008). Loneliness was significantly associated with IPV in both groups. Younger age and binge drinking were associated with IPV prevalence among trans women. For cisgender women, IPV was associated with withdrawal of cash transfer programs during the shelter-in-place. Conclusion: Trans women experienced significantly more IPV than cisgender women in the early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic. Plans to prevent and address violence against cisgender and trans women, especially those with heightened vulnerability that may be associated with living with HIV, are needed in public health planning for future pandemics.","PeriodicalId":37265,"journal":{"name":"Transgender Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transgender Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2023.0057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Our study was conducted to estimate intimate partner violence (IPV) prevalence and associated factors among trans and cisgender women at risk of or living with HIV during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between May and August 2020 through telephone surveys with cisgender and trans women enrolled in two cohort studies in Rio de Janeiro. We assessed IPV employing the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale during the initial months of shelter-in-place ordinances. Regression models evaluated the factors associated with IPV for each population. Results: We surveyed 796 women, and 341 participants (47.78%) were eligible and included in the current analysis. All cisgender women and 41 (64.06%) trans women were living with HIV. Overall IPV prevalence was 27.86% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 23.34–32.88). IPV was 63% higher among trans women than among cisgender women (prevalence ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.14–2.34, p=0.008). Loneliness was significantly associated with IPV in both groups. Younger age and binge drinking were associated with IPV prevalence among trans women. For cisgender women, IPV was associated with withdrawal of cash transfer programs during the shelter-in-place. Conclusion: Trans women experienced significantly more IPV than cisgender women in the early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic. Plans to prevent and address violence against cisgender and trans women, especially those with heightened vulnerability that may be associated with living with HIV, are needed in public health planning for future pandemics.
在2019冠状病毒病时代,巴西跨性别和顺性别妇女感染艾滋病毒或面临艾滋病毒风险的亲密伴侣暴力:另一种流行病?
目的:我们的研究旨在估计巴西里约热内卢冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间有感染艾滋病毒风险或感染艾滋病毒的跨性别和顺性别妇女中亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的流行情况及其相关因素。方法:在2020年5月至8月期间,通过电话调查对里约热内卢参加两项队列研究的顺性别和跨性别女性进行了横断面研究。我们在避难所条例实施的最初几个月,使用修订冲突战术量表评估IPV。回归模型评估了每个人群与IPV相关的因素。结果:我们调查了796名女性,341名参与者(47.78%)符合条件并纳入当前分析。所有顺性别女性和41名跨性别女性(64.06%)感染艾滋病毒。总体IPV患病率为27.86%(95%可信区间[95% CI] 23.34-32.88)。跨性别女性的IPV比顺性女性高63%(患病率比1.63,95% CI 1.14-2.34, p=0.008)。在两组中,孤独感与IPV显著相关。年轻和酗酒与跨性别女性的IPV患病率有关。对于顺性妇女来说,IPV与就地避难期间现金转移计划的退出有关。结论:在COVID-19流行早期,跨性别女性的IPV发生率明显高于顺性女性。在针对未来流行病的公共卫生规划中,需要制定计划,预防和处理针对顺性和变性妇女的暴力行为,特别是那些可能因感染艾滋病毒而更加脆弱的妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transgender Health
Transgender Health Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
122
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信