{"title":"Alexander R. Korsunsky: The combat experience of a medievalist","authors":"O. V. Aurov","doi":"10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-2-187-212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the problem how combat experience influenced professional activity in the sphere of medieval studies, based on the case of A. R. Korsunsky (1914–1980). The study draws on documents from the Central Archives of the Ministry of Defense (Moscow) and from the Archive of the Medieval Studies Department of the Faculty of History, Moscow State University. The influence of Korsunsky’s combat experience is studied in the context of some clear parallels with the combat biographies of Ernst Kantorowicz and Marc Bloch. Some important tendencies of their scholarly activity can be explained only by this factor. Korsunsky became a volunteer in July, 1941, at the beginning of the Great Patriotic War. He participated in the battles of Kursk (1943), of Dnieper River (1943) and the Korsun-Shevchenkovsky offensive (1944). At the same time, his scholarly views were greatly influenced by his experience as a propaganda officer and as an officer of the Political Department of the 1st Guards Army Staff (since 1944). The main result of this experience (both combat and that as staff officer) was to strengthen and consolidate his Marxist vision of historical processes, in spite of his critical attitude towards some aspects of Soviet life. While Korsunsky maintained close links with foreign colleagues and saw his work as part of world scholarship, he, like many other former veterans, remained true to Marxist views to the end of his life.","PeriodicalId":36644,"journal":{"name":"Shagi/ Steps","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shagi/ Steps","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-2-187-212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article considers the problem how combat experience influenced professional activity in the sphere of medieval studies, based on the case of A. R. Korsunsky (1914–1980). The study draws on documents from the Central Archives of the Ministry of Defense (Moscow) and from the Archive of the Medieval Studies Department of the Faculty of History, Moscow State University. The influence of Korsunsky’s combat experience is studied in the context of some clear parallels with the combat biographies of Ernst Kantorowicz and Marc Bloch. Some important tendencies of their scholarly activity can be explained only by this factor. Korsunsky became a volunteer in July, 1941, at the beginning of the Great Patriotic War. He participated in the battles of Kursk (1943), of Dnieper River (1943) and the Korsun-Shevchenkovsky offensive (1944). At the same time, his scholarly views were greatly influenced by his experience as a propaganda officer and as an officer of the Political Department of the 1st Guards Army Staff (since 1944). The main result of this experience (both combat and that as staff officer) was to strengthen and consolidate his Marxist vision of historical processes, in spite of his critical attitude towards some aspects of Soviet life. While Korsunsky maintained close links with foreign colleagues and saw his work as part of world scholarship, he, like many other former veterans, remained true to Marxist views to the end of his life.
本文以A. R. Korsunsky(1914-1980)的案例为基础,探讨了战斗经验如何影响中世纪研究领域的专业活动。该研究利用了来自国防部(莫斯科)中央档案馆和莫斯科国立大学历史系中世纪研究部门档案馆的文件。Korsunsky的战斗经历对他的影响是在与Ernst Kantorowicz和Marc Bloch的战斗传记相比较的背景下进行研究的。他们学术活动的一些重要倾向只能用这个因素来解释。1941年7月,卫国战争开始时,科尔孙斯基成为一名志愿者。他参加了库尔斯克战役(1943年)、第聂伯河战役(1943年)和科尔松-舍甫琴科夫斯基攻势(1944年)。同时,他的学术观点也深受他担任宣传官员和第一近卫军参谋政治部官员(自1944年起)的经历的影响。尽管他对苏联生活的某些方面持批判态度,但这段经历(包括战斗和担任参谋)的主要结果是加强和巩固了他对历史进程的马克思主义观点。虽然科尔孙斯基与外国同事保持着密切的联系,并将自己的工作视为世界学术的一部分,但他像许多其他退伍军人一样,直到生命的尽头都忠于马克思主义的观点。