Contribution of the Roman rat lines/strains to personality neuroscience: neurobehavioral modeling of internalizing/externalizing psychopathologies

Q3 Medicine
Alberto Fernández-Teruel, Toni Cañete, Daniel Sampedro-Viana, Ignasi Oliveras, Rafael Torrubia, Adolf Tobeña
{"title":"Contribution of the Roman rat lines/strains to personality neuroscience: neurobehavioral modeling of internalizing/externalizing psychopathologies","authors":"Alberto Fernández-Teruel, Toni Cañete, Daniel Sampedro-Viana, Ignasi Oliveras, Rafael Torrubia, Adolf Tobeña","doi":"10.1017/pen.2023.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Roman high-avoidance (RHA) and low-avoidance (RLA) rat lines/strains were established in Rome through bidirectional selection of Wistar rats for rapid (RHA) or extremely poor (RLA) acquisition of a two-way active avoidance task. Relative to RHAs, RLA rats exhibit enhanced threat sensitivity, anxiety, fear and vulnerability to stress, a passive coping style and increased sensitivity to frustration. Thus, RLA rats’ phenotypic profile falls well within the “internalizing” behavior spectrum. Compared with RLAs and other rat strains/stocks, RHAs present increased impulsivity and reward sensitivity, deficits in social behavior and attentional/cognitive processes, novelty-induced hyper-locomotion and vulnerability to psychostimulant sensitization and drug addiction. Thus, RHA rats’ phenotypes are consistent with a “disinhibiting externalizing” profile. Many neurobiological/molecular traits differentiate both rat lines/strains. For example, relative to RLA rats, RHAs exhibit decreased function of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), hippocampus and amygdala, increased functional tone of the mesolimbic dopamine system, a deficit of central metabotropic glutamate-2 (mGlu2) receptors, increased density of serotonin 5-HT2A receptors in the PFC, impairment of GABAergic transmission in the PFC, alterations of several synaptic markers and increased density of pyramidal immature dendrític spines in the PFC. These characteristics suggest an immature brain of RHA rats and are reminiscent of schizophrenia features like hypofrontality and disruption of the excitation/inhibition cortical balance. We review evidence supporting RLA rats as a valid model of anxiety/fear, stress and frustration vulnerability, whereas RHA rats represent a promising translational model of neurodevelopmental alterations related to impulsivity, schizophrenia-relevant features and comorbidity with drug addiction vulnerability.","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2023.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Roman high-avoidance (RHA) and low-avoidance (RLA) rat lines/strains were established in Rome through bidirectional selection of Wistar rats for rapid (RHA) or extremely poor (RLA) acquisition of a two-way active avoidance task. Relative to RHAs, RLA rats exhibit enhanced threat sensitivity, anxiety, fear and vulnerability to stress, a passive coping style and increased sensitivity to frustration. Thus, RLA rats’ phenotypic profile falls well within the “internalizing” behavior spectrum. Compared with RLAs and other rat strains/stocks, RHAs present increased impulsivity and reward sensitivity, deficits in social behavior and attentional/cognitive processes, novelty-induced hyper-locomotion and vulnerability to psychostimulant sensitization and drug addiction. Thus, RHA rats’ phenotypes are consistent with a “disinhibiting externalizing” profile. Many neurobiological/molecular traits differentiate both rat lines/strains. For example, relative to RLA rats, RHAs exhibit decreased function of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), hippocampus and amygdala, increased functional tone of the mesolimbic dopamine system, a deficit of central metabotropic glutamate-2 (mGlu2) receptors, increased density of serotonin 5-HT2A receptors in the PFC, impairment of GABAergic transmission in the PFC, alterations of several synaptic markers and increased density of pyramidal immature dendrític spines in the PFC. These characteristics suggest an immature brain of RHA rats and are reminiscent of schizophrenia features like hypofrontality and disruption of the excitation/inhibition cortical balance. We review evidence supporting RLA rats as a valid model of anxiety/fear, stress and frustration vulnerability, whereas RHA rats represent a promising translational model of neurodevelopmental alterations related to impulsivity, schizophrenia-relevant features and comorbidity with drug addiction vulnerability.
罗马大鼠系/品系对人格神经科学的贡献:内化/外化精神病理学的神经行为建模
通过双向选择Wistar大鼠快速(RHA)或极差(RLA)获取双向主动回避任务,在罗马建立了罗马高回避(RHA)和低回避(RLA)大鼠系/品系。与rha相比,RLA大鼠表现出更强的威胁敏感性、焦虑、恐惧和对压力的脆弱性、被动应对方式和对挫折的敏感性。因此,RLA大鼠的表型特征很好地落在“内化”行为谱内。与rla和其他大鼠品系/品类相比,rha表现出冲动和奖励敏感性增加,社会行为和注意/认知过程缺陷,新奇诱导的超运动,易受精神兴奋剂致敏和药物成瘾的影响。因此,RHA大鼠的表型与“去抑制外化”特征一致。许多神经生物学/分子特征区分这两个大鼠系/品系。例如,相对于RLA大鼠,RHAs表现出前额皮质(PFC)、海马和杏仁核功能下降,中边缘多巴胺系统功能张力增加,中枢代谢性谷氨酸-2 (mGlu2)受体缺陷,PFC中5-HT2A受体密度增加,PFC中gaba能传递受损,PFC中gaba能传递受损。pfc中几个突触标记物的改变和锥体未成熟dendrític棘的密度增加。这些特征表明RHA大鼠的大脑不成熟,并且使人联想到精神分裂症的特征,如前额叶低下和兴奋/抑制皮层平衡的破坏。我们回顾了支持RLA大鼠作为焦虑/恐惧、压力和挫折易感性的有效模型的证据,而RHA大鼠则代表了与冲动、精神分裂症相关特征和药物成瘾易感性共病相关的神经发育改变的有希望的转化模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信