A Further Look into the Use of a Dictionary APP in EFL Writing: A Replication Study

IF 0.9 2区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Lexikos Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5788/33-1-1820
Yuzhen Chen, Suping Liu
{"title":"A Further Look into the Use of a Dictionary APP in EFL Writing: A Replication Study","authors":"Yuzhen Chen, Suping Liu","doi":"10.5788/33-1-1820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study replicated the experiment by Chen and Liu (2022), investigating the effect of dictionary use on EFL writing. It involved the same research variables as the original study except for adopting a different dictionary. Sixty-two English majors took two writing tests, one without dictionary assistance, the other with access to a mobile phone dictionary application which features a combination of an L1–L2 and an L2–L1 dictionary for bidirectional search. The application can keep a record of users' search inputs and entry clicks. A questionnaire was also conducted to survey the students' evaluation of the dictionary application. Different from the negative results found by the original study, the replication revealed a non-significant effect of dictionary use on writing performance, providing solid evidence that a better dictionary leads to fewer consultation errors, although the improvement in writing scores brought about by dictionary use was only marginal. The study confirmed the original finding about the positive impact of dictionary use on lexical sophistication. It also identified some differences in dictionary lookup patterns between the participants of the replication and the original study in terms of search frequency, preference for language search, preference for search items, and use of source dictionaries. The implications of the study for dictionary making are discussed. Keywords: replication, dictionary use, EFL writing, writing performance, lexical sophistication, lookup patterns","PeriodicalId":43907,"journal":{"name":"Lexikos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lexikos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5788/33-1-1820","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study replicated the experiment by Chen and Liu (2022), investigating the effect of dictionary use on EFL writing. It involved the same research variables as the original study except for adopting a different dictionary. Sixty-two English majors took two writing tests, one without dictionary assistance, the other with access to a mobile phone dictionary application which features a combination of an L1–L2 and an L2–L1 dictionary for bidirectional search. The application can keep a record of users' search inputs and entry clicks. A questionnaire was also conducted to survey the students' evaluation of the dictionary application. Different from the negative results found by the original study, the replication revealed a non-significant effect of dictionary use on writing performance, providing solid evidence that a better dictionary leads to fewer consultation errors, although the improvement in writing scores brought about by dictionary use was only marginal. The study confirmed the original finding about the positive impact of dictionary use on lexical sophistication. It also identified some differences in dictionary lookup patterns between the participants of the replication and the original study in terms of search frequency, preference for language search, preference for search items, and use of source dictionaries. The implications of the study for dictionary making are discussed. Keywords: replication, dictionary use, EFL writing, writing performance, lexical sophistication, lookup patterns
词典APP在英语写作中的应用:一项复制研究
该研究复制了Chen和Liu(2022)的实验,调查了词典使用对英语写作的影响。除了使用不同的词典外,它涉及与原始研究相同的研究变量。62名英语专业学生参加了两项写作测试,其中一项没有词典帮助,另一项使用手机词典应用程序,该应用程序具有L1-L2和L2-L1词典的组合,用于双向搜索。该应用程序可以记录用户的搜索输入和输入点击。通过问卷调查,了解学生对词典应用的评价。与原始研究的负面结果不同,重复研究发现字典的使用对写作成绩的影响不显著,这为更好的字典导致更少的咨询错误提供了确凿的证据,尽管使用字典带来的写作分数的提高只是微不足道的。这项研究证实了最初关于使用词典对词汇复杂性有积极影响的发现。它还确定了复制参与者和原始研究参与者在搜索频率、对语言搜索的偏好、对搜索项的偏好和对源字典的使用方面的字典查找模式的一些差异。讨论了本研究对词典编纂的启示。关键词:复制,字典使用,英语写作,写作表现,词汇复杂性,查找模式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lexikos
Lexikos Multiple-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Lexikos (Greek for "of or for words") is a journal for the lexicographical specialist. It is the only journal in Africa which is exclusively devoted to lexicography. Articles dealing with all aspects of lexicography and terminology or the implications that research in related disciplines such as linguistics, computer and information science, etc. has for lexicography will be considered for publication. Articles may be written in Afrikaans, English, Dutch, German and French.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信