A SURVEY OF HOW POLITICAL MISINFORMATION GUIDED WRONGLY INTO PEOPLE

Smriti Sharma
{"title":"A SURVEY OF HOW POLITICAL MISINFORMATION GUIDED WRONGLY INTO PEOPLE","authors":"Smriti Sharma","doi":"10.55829/ijmpr.v2i4.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the relationship between the quality of information, literacy skills, social media use, and belief in false news. The findings suggest that high-quality information and literacy skills are associated with a lower belief in false news. The study also found that social media use is not a significant predictor of belief in false news. The results suggest that misinformation can be a threat to democracy and that factors such as the quality of information and literacy skills are important for countering it. The study did not find a significant difference in coordination maintenance between groups. The factors affecting the difficulty in tackling false news were not explored in this study. The study did not assess the level of corruption on a topic or discuss the reasons for creating fake news. Overall, the study highlights the importance of high-quality information and literacy skills in countering political misinformation.
 The survey investigates the relationship between various factors and the spread of political misinformation. The study analyses 199 observations using several statistical methods, including Spearman rank correlation, paired t-test, multiple regression, and one-way ANOVA. The results suggest that there is a positive but weak correlation between high- quality information and the threat to democracy. The study also reveals that individuals with higher literacy skills and those who consume high-quality information may be less likely to believe false news. The findings further suggest that social media platforms may contribute to the difficulty in judging the quality of information. Additionally, the study reveals that corruption level varies depending on the topic. The study provides insights into the mechanics of political misinformation and the factors that contribute to its spread.","PeriodicalId":471112,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Public Policy and Research","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Public Policy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55829/ijmpr.v2i4.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between the quality of information, literacy skills, social media use, and belief in false news. The findings suggest that high-quality information and literacy skills are associated with a lower belief in false news. The study also found that social media use is not a significant predictor of belief in false news. The results suggest that misinformation can be a threat to democracy and that factors such as the quality of information and literacy skills are important for countering it. The study did not find a significant difference in coordination maintenance between groups. The factors affecting the difficulty in tackling false news were not explored in this study. The study did not assess the level of corruption on a topic or discuss the reasons for creating fake news. Overall, the study highlights the importance of high-quality information and literacy skills in countering political misinformation. The survey investigates the relationship between various factors and the spread of political misinformation. The study analyses 199 observations using several statistical methods, including Spearman rank correlation, paired t-test, multiple regression, and one-way ANOVA. The results suggest that there is a positive but weak correlation between high- quality information and the threat to democracy. The study also reveals that individuals with higher literacy skills and those who consume high-quality information may be less likely to believe false news. The findings further suggest that social media platforms may contribute to the difficulty in judging the quality of information. Additionally, the study reveals that corruption level varies depending on the topic. The study provides insights into the mechanics of political misinformation and the factors that contribute to its spread.
一项关于政治错误信息如何误导人们的调查
这项研究考察了信息质量、读写能力、社交媒体使用和对虚假新闻的信任之间的关系。研究结果表明,高质量的信息和读写能力与对虚假新闻的信任度较低有关。该研究还发现,社交媒体的使用并不是人们相信假新闻的重要预测因素。研究结果表明,错误信息可能对民主构成威胁,而信息质量和读写能力等因素对于应对这种威胁很重要。该研究没有发现两组之间在协调维持方面有显著差异。本研究未探讨影响虚假新闻处理难度的因素。这项研究没有评估某一话题的腐败程度,也没有讨论制造假新闻的原因。总体而言,该研究强调了高质量信息和扫盲技能在打击政治错误信息方面的重要性。该调查调查了各种因素与政治错误信息传播之间的关系。本研究采用Spearman秩相关、配对t检验、多元回归、单因素方差分析等统计方法对199项观察结果进行分析。结果表明,高质量信息与民主威胁之间存在正相关,但相关性较弱。该研究还显示,文化水平较高的人和那些消费高质量信息的人可能不太可能相信假新闻。研究结果进一步表明,社交媒体平台可能会增加判断信息质量的难度。此外,该研究还显示,腐败程度因主题而异。这项研究为政治错误信息的机制和导致其传播的因素提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信