Effect of operation table height on ease of mask ventilation, laryngeal view, and endotracheal intubation success

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mamta Jain, Kunika Tantia, Sanjay Johar, Anish Kumar Singh, Teena Bansal, Jyoti Sharma
{"title":"Effect of operation table height on ease of mask ventilation, laryngeal view, and endotracheal intubation success","authors":"Mamta Jain, Kunika Tantia, Sanjay Johar, Anish Kumar Singh, Teena Bansal, Jyoti Sharma","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_443_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background and Aims: Optimal patient positioning and operating table height are essential for an ergonomic posture of an anesthesiologist in which there is minimal or no strain on thewrist during mask ventilation. It also avoids flexion of the neck, lower back, and knee bending at the time of laryngoscopy and intubation. Material and Methods One hundred eighty patients were randomly allocated to three groups based on different table heights. The height of the table is kept at the mid-sternum level of an anesthesiologist in group 1, at the xiphoid process in group 2, and at the level of umbilicus in group 3. Laryngoscopic view with or without postural changes (exertion at wrist joint, flexion of the neck, lower back, or knee bending) was graded as per Cormack Lehane’s (CL) grading. The degree of discomfort experienced by the anesthesiologist during mask ventilation or tracheal intubation was graded subjectively (1 = no discomfort, 2 = mild discomfort, 3 = moderate discomfort, and 4 = severe discomfort) at different table heights. Postural changes required to obtain the best glottic view and quality of endotracheal (ET) intubation (intubation time and attempts required) were also noted. For analysis, quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± SD and compared using unpaired t or analysis of variance test. Qualitative variables were expressed as frequencies/percentages and compared using the Chi-square test. Results with P value <0.05 were considered significant statistically. Results Moderate discomfort (strain at wrist joint) during bag–mask ventilation was experienced by the anesthesiologist in a maximum number of patients in group 1 (81.7%). Significant improvement was seen in CL grade after the use of postural modifications in groups 1 and 2 ( P value ≤0.05). Greater postural modifications were required during ET intubation at lower table heights (group 3). Conclusions: It is advisable to adopt higher table positioning in relation to anesthesiologist performing the laryngoscopy for smooth and single-attempt ET intubation since the best laryngoscopic view and intubation with minimal postural modifications was seen at higher table heights (at the mid-sternum level of an anesthesiologist).","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_443_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims: Optimal patient positioning and operating table height are essential for an ergonomic posture of an anesthesiologist in which there is minimal or no strain on thewrist during mask ventilation. It also avoids flexion of the neck, lower back, and knee bending at the time of laryngoscopy and intubation. Material and Methods One hundred eighty patients were randomly allocated to three groups based on different table heights. The height of the table is kept at the mid-sternum level of an anesthesiologist in group 1, at the xiphoid process in group 2, and at the level of umbilicus in group 3. Laryngoscopic view with or without postural changes (exertion at wrist joint, flexion of the neck, lower back, or knee bending) was graded as per Cormack Lehane’s (CL) grading. The degree of discomfort experienced by the anesthesiologist during mask ventilation or tracheal intubation was graded subjectively (1 = no discomfort, 2 = mild discomfort, 3 = moderate discomfort, and 4 = severe discomfort) at different table heights. Postural changes required to obtain the best glottic view and quality of endotracheal (ET) intubation (intubation time and attempts required) were also noted. For analysis, quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± SD and compared using unpaired t or analysis of variance test. Qualitative variables were expressed as frequencies/percentages and compared using the Chi-square test. Results with P value <0.05 were considered significant statistically. Results Moderate discomfort (strain at wrist joint) during bag–mask ventilation was experienced by the anesthesiologist in a maximum number of patients in group 1 (81.7%). Significant improvement was seen in CL grade after the use of postural modifications in groups 1 and 2 ( P value ≤0.05). Greater postural modifications were required during ET intubation at lower table heights (group 3). Conclusions: It is advisable to adopt higher table positioning in relation to anesthesiologist performing the laryngoscopy for smooth and single-attempt ET intubation since the best laryngoscopic view and intubation with minimal postural modifications was seen at higher table heights (at the mid-sternum level of an anesthesiologist).
手术台高度对面罩通气、喉部观察及气管插管成功率的影响
摘要背景和目的:最佳的患者体位和手术台高度对于麻醉医师的人体工程学姿势至关重要,在面罩通气期间腕部的压力最小或没有压力。它还可以避免在喉镜检查和插管时颈部、下背部和膝盖弯曲。材料与方法180例患者根据不同的桌高随机分为3组。第1组麻醉医师将手术台高度保持在胸骨中段,第2组保持在剑突,第3组保持在脐部。根据Cormack Lehane (CL)分级,在喉镜下观察有无体位变化(手腕关节用力、颈部屈曲、下背部或膝盖弯曲)。对麻醉医师在面罩通气或气管插管时的不适程度进行主观分级(1 =无不适,2 =轻度不适,3 =中度不适,4 =严重不适)。还记录了获得最佳声门视野和气管内插管质量(插管时间和所需次数)所需的体位变化。定量变量以均数±标准差表示,采用未配对t或方差分析检验进行比较。定性变量以频率/百分比表示,并使用卡方检验进行比较。P值为<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果麻醉医师在气囊面罩通气过程中出现中度不适(腕关节劳损)的患者最多,占81.7%。第1组和第2组采用体位改良后CL分级有显著改善(P值≤0.05)。在较低的手术台高度进行ET插管时,需要更大的体位调整(第3组)。结论:由于在较高的手术台高度(麻醉医师的胸骨中位)可以看到最佳的喉镜视野和最小体位调整,因此,与麻醉师进行顺畅的单次ET插管相比,建议采用较高的手术台位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信