Fidgets and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Teacher Perceptions

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Sarah Mugavero, Alysha Skuthan, Katrina Christopher
{"title":"Fidgets and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Teacher Perceptions","authors":"Sarah Mugavero, Alysha Skuthan, Katrina Christopher","doi":"10.1080/19411243.2023.2275568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis qualitative study explores the lack of understanding of teacher perceptions on classroom utilization of fidgets with students who have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Eight American special education middle school teachers from a midsized suburban public school district in Illinois were interviewed. Interview transcripts were reviewed to establish codes and themes. Three themes were identified: Misapplication of Fidgets, Support to Implement Fidgets Within the Classroom, and When Fidgets Work. Participants reported that fidgets can be a beneficial self-regulation tool in the classroom but may not serve as an appropriate educational tool for all students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Additionally, participants emphasized the importance of establishing ground rules and acknowledged the benefits of seeking support from external resources, such as a school-based occupational therapist, when distributing fidgets in the classroom, especially with more complex student cases.KEYWORDS: ADHDfidgetmiddle schoolspecial educationqualitative constructionism AcknowledgementsI would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Skuthan and Dr. Christopher for their mentorship and assistance as coding partners throughout this research study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.","PeriodicalId":51889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Therapy Schools and Early Intervention","volume":"26 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Therapy Schools and Early Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2023.2275568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis qualitative study explores the lack of understanding of teacher perceptions on classroom utilization of fidgets with students who have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Eight American special education middle school teachers from a midsized suburban public school district in Illinois were interviewed. Interview transcripts were reviewed to establish codes and themes. Three themes were identified: Misapplication of Fidgets, Support to Implement Fidgets Within the Classroom, and When Fidgets Work. Participants reported that fidgets can be a beneficial self-regulation tool in the classroom but may not serve as an appropriate educational tool for all students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Additionally, participants emphasized the importance of establishing ground rules and acknowledged the benefits of seeking support from external resources, such as a school-based occupational therapist, when distributing fidgets in the classroom, especially with more complex student cases.KEYWORDS: ADHDfidgetmiddle schoolspecial educationqualitative constructionism AcknowledgementsI would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Skuthan and Dr. Christopher for their mentorship and assistance as coding partners throughout this research study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.
坐立不安和注意力缺陷多动障碍:教师感知
摘要本质性研究探讨了教师对注意缺陷多动障碍学生课堂使用的认知缺乏了解。来自伊利诺伊州一个中等规模郊区公立学区的8名美国特殊教育中学教师接受了采访。审查了采访笔录,以确定准则和主题。确定了三个主题:烦躁的错误应用,支持在课堂中实现烦躁,以及烦躁何时起作用。参与者报告说,在课堂上,坐立不安可能是一种有益的自我调节工具,但可能不是所有患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的学生都适合的教育工具。此外,参与者强调了建立基本规则的重要性,并承认寻求外部资源支持的好处,比如学校的职业治疗师,当在教室里分配烦躁时,特别是在更复杂的学生案例中。关键词:注意力缺失多动症躁动症中学特殊教育定性建构主义致谢感谢Dr. Skuthan和Dr. Christopher在整个研究过程中作为编码伙伴对我的指导和帮助。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。其他信息资金作者报告没有与本文所述工作相关的资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
28.60%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信