The surgical outcomes and nuances of the telovelar approach for pontine and medullary cavernous malformations: A multi-institutional case series

Inseo Hong, Kyung Hwan Kim, Huyk-Jin Oh, Sae Min Kwon, Hee-Won Jeong, Eun-Oh Jung, Han-Joo Lee, Hyon-Jo Kwon, Seung-Won Choi, Seon-Hwan Kim, Hyeon-Song Koh, Jin-Young Youm
{"title":"The surgical outcomes and nuances of the telovelar approach for pontine and medullary cavernous malformations: A multi-institutional case series","authors":"Inseo Hong, Kyung Hwan Kim, Huyk-Jin Oh, Sae Min Kwon, Hee-Won Jeong, Eun-Oh Jung, Han-Joo Lee, Hyon-Jo Kwon, Seung-Won Choi, Seon-Hwan Kim, Hyeon-Song Koh, Jin-Young Youm","doi":"10.55911/jksbs.23.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Brainstem cavernous malformations (CMs) are characterized by dilated sinusoidal channels related to capillary telangiectasia and developmental venous anomalies. Brainstem CM hemorrhages present with focal neurological symptoms, according to their invasive lesions. Surgical removal should be considered for symptomatic and recurrent bleeding of brainstem CMs. Despite the risk of surgery with highly eloquent tissue, surgical removal should be performed to protect patients from stepwise decline due to recurrent hemorrhage. The approaches for treating brainstem CMs are retrosigmoid, far lateral, midline suboccipital with or without telovelar, orbitozygomatic, and supracerebellar-infratentorial. Pontine and medullary CMs are approached via retrosigmoid, far lateral, and suboccipital craniotomies, with or without the telovelar approach. 
 Materials and Methods: The telovelar approach is the standard approach used for pontine brain-stem CMs. Patients with brainstem CMs treated using the telovelar approach were enrolled from three institutions. 
 Results: All three patients had no further neurological deficits after surgery. 
 Conclusions: The surgical results suggest that the telovelar approach for pons and pontomedul-lary junction brainstem CMs is safe and effective.","PeriodicalId":49515,"journal":{"name":"Skull Base-An Interdisciplinary Approach","volume":"158 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skull Base-An Interdisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55911/jksbs.23.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Brainstem cavernous malformations (CMs) are characterized by dilated sinusoidal channels related to capillary telangiectasia and developmental venous anomalies. Brainstem CM hemorrhages present with focal neurological symptoms, according to their invasive lesions. Surgical removal should be considered for symptomatic and recurrent bleeding of brainstem CMs. Despite the risk of surgery with highly eloquent tissue, surgical removal should be performed to protect patients from stepwise decline due to recurrent hemorrhage. The approaches for treating brainstem CMs are retrosigmoid, far lateral, midline suboccipital with or without telovelar, orbitozygomatic, and supracerebellar-infratentorial. Pontine and medullary CMs are approached via retrosigmoid, far lateral, and suboccipital craniotomies, with or without the telovelar approach. Materials and Methods: The telovelar approach is the standard approach used for pontine brain-stem CMs. Patients with brainstem CMs treated using the telovelar approach were enrolled from three institutions. Results: All three patients had no further neurological deficits after surgery. Conclusions: The surgical results suggest that the telovelar approach for pons and pontomedul-lary junction brainstem CMs is safe and effective.
远侧入路治疗脑桥和髓样海绵状畸形的手术结果和细微差别:一个多机构的病例系列
背景:脑干海绵状畸形(CMs)的特征是与毛细血管扩张和发育性静脉异常相关的正弦通道扩张。脑干CM出血表现为局灶性神经系统症状,根据其侵入性病变。脑干CMs的症状性和复发性出血应考虑手术切除。尽管手术的风险与高度雄辩的组织,手术切除应进行,以保护患者从逐步下降,由于复发性出血。治疗脑干CMs的入路有乙状窦后、远外侧、枕下中线伴或不伴远端、眶颧、小脑上-幕下。脑桥和髓系cm可经乙状窦后、远外侧和枕下开颅入路,可采用或不采用远侧入路。& # x0D;材料和方法:端部入路是脑桥脑干cm的标准入路。采用替洛维尔入路治疗的脑干CMs患者来自三个机构。& # x0D;结果:3例患者术后均无进一步神经功能缺损。& # x0D;结论:脑桥及桥髓-大脑干交界处脑干cm采用远侧入路是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信