Comparing Inoculation Methods of Clavibacter nebraskensis on Corn (Zea mays) Under Greenhouse Conditions

IF 1.7 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Nathan Haugrud, LeAnn Lux, Andrew Friskop, Joseph Ikley
{"title":"Comparing Inoculation Methods of <i>Clavibacter nebraskensis</i> on Corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) Under Greenhouse Conditions","authors":"Nathan Haugrud, LeAnn Lux, Andrew Friskop, Joseph Ikley","doi":"10.1094/php-04-23-0038-rs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goss’s bacterial wilt and leaf blight of corn (Zea mays L.), caused by Clavibacter nebraskensis, is one of the top yield-reducing corn diseases in the Northern Great Plains. The use of efficient and repeatable inoculation methods in the greenhouse are needed to further understand disease development and host resistance. Although several inoculation methods have been reported, a direct comparison among them in the greenhouse has not been conducted. A greenhouse study was conducted to compare established methods for time to inoculate, disease incidence, and lesion development. Methods evaluated included creating wounds with scissors, pin-prick tools, sandpaper, or carborundum, or introducing bacteria by spraying, immersion, sponge, or syringe. Removing leaf tips with scissors and dipping newly injured leaf in bacterial suspension resulted in the fastest inoculation time (24 seconds), highest disease incidence (&gt;80%), and fastest lesion development among methods tested. Most other methods had similar disease development, but varied on their success rate (incidence). These results can aid researchers on selecting inoculation methods to address research objectives on Goss’s wilt in the greenhouse.","PeriodicalId":20251,"journal":{"name":"Plant Health Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Health Progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/php-04-23-0038-rs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goss’s bacterial wilt and leaf blight of corn (Zea mays L.), caused by Clavibacter nebraskensis, is one of the top yield-reducing corn diseases in the Northern Great Plains. The use of efficient and repeatable inoculation methods in the greenhouse are needed to further understand disease development and host resistance. Although several inoculation methods have been reported, a direct comparison among them in the greenhouse has not been conducted. A greenhouse study was conducted to compare established methods for time to inoculate, disease incidence, and lesion development. Methods evaluated included creating wounds with scissors, pin-prick tools, sandpaper, or carborundum, or introducing bacteria by spraying, immersion, sponge, or syringe. Removing leaf tips with scissors and dipping newly injured leaf in bacterial suspension resulted in the fastest inoculation time (24 seconds), highest disease incidence (>80%), and fastest lesion development among methods tested. Most other methods had similar disease development, but varied on their success rate (incidence). These results can aid researchers on selecting inoculation methods to address research objectives on Goss’s wilt in the greenhouse.
温室条件下玉米内布拉斯卡杆菌接种方法比较
玉米青枯病(Goss 's bacterial wilt and leaf疫病,简称Zea mays L.)是美国北部大平原地区主要的玉米减产病害之一,由内布拉斯加大杆菌(Clavibacter nebraska)引起。需要在温室中使用高效和可重复的接种方法,以进一步了解疾病的发展和宿主的抗性。虽然已经报道了几种接种方法,但尚未在温室中进行直接比较。一项温室研究对接种时间、疾病发生率和病变发展的既定方法进行了比较。评估的方法包括用剪刀、针刺工具、砂纸或金刚砂创面,或通过喷洒、浸泡、海绵或注射器引入细菌。用剪刀剪去叶尖,将新伤叶片浸泡在菌悬液中,接种时间最快(24秒),发病率最高(80%),病变发展最快。大多数其他方法有类似的疾病发展,但成功率(发病率)不同。这些结果可以帮助研究人员选择接种方法,以解决温室高斯枯萎病的研究目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Health Progress
Plant Health Progress Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Plant Health Progress, a member journal of the Plant Management Network, is a multidisciplinary science-based journal covering all aspects of applied plant health management in agriculture and horticulture. Both peer-reviewed and fully citable, the journal is a credible online-only publication. Plant Health Progress is a not-for-profit collaborative endeavor of the plant health community at large, serving practitioners worldwide. Its primary goal is to provide a comprehensive one-stop Internet resource for plant health information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信