Adoption of agroecological intensification practices in Southern Africa: A scientific review

IF 1.7 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mark Manyanga, Tarisayi Pedzisa, Benjamine Hanyani-Mlambo
{"title":"Adoption of agroecological intensification practices in Southern Africa: A scientific review","authors":"Mark Manyanga, Tarisayi Pedzisa, Benjamine Hanyani-Mlambo","doi":"10.1080/23311932.2023.2261838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many international policy and academic circles have explored the effects of climate change on household livelihood outcomes, such as food and nutrition security, household income, and household resilience. Yet, little attention has been paid to understanding how literature has framed adoption drivers of agroecological intensification practices, an area addressed in this study. This review consolidates available literature on how adoption impacts crop yields, food and nutrition security, household incomes, and poverty reduction in Southern Africa. We systematically reviewed 45 empirical studies on adoption drivers and the associated impacts on household livelihood outcomes. Variables affecting adoption of agroecological intensification practices are rainfall distribution and temperature, non-farm economic activities, status of soil fertility, market access, ownership of communication equipment, livestock ownership, age of household head, gender of the household head, household size, factors of production and wealth status. Majority of the reviewed publications found a positive correlation between the use of agroecological intensification practices and crop yield, food and nutrition security, household incomes, and poverty reduction. Thus, it is recommended that agricultural interventions are designed in a way that farmers have a sense of ownership to ensure continuity of adoption, and practices are tailored to the needs of the target population, taking into account both the mix of technologies and existing farmer resource constraints.","PeriodicalId":10521,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Food & Agriculture","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Food & Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2023.2261838","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many international policy and academic circles have explored the effects of climate change on household livelihood outcomes, such as food and nutrition security, household income, and household resilience. Yet, little attention has been paid to understanding how literature has framed adoption drivers of agroecological intensification practices, an area addressed in this study. This review consolidates available literature on how adoption impacts crop yields, food and nutrition security, household incomes, and poverty reduction in Southern Africa. We systematically reviewed 45 empirical studies on adoption drivers and the associated impacts on household livelihood outcomes. Variables affecting adoption of agroecological intensification practices are rainfall distribution and temperature, non-farm economic activities, status of soil fertility, market access, ownership of communication equipment, livestock ownership, age of household head, gender of the household head, household size, factors of production and wealth status. Majority of the reviewed publications found a positive correlation between the use of agroecological intensification practices and crop yield, food and nutrition security, household incomes, and poverty reduction. Thus, it is recommended that agricultural interventions are designed in a way that farmers have a sense of ownership to ensure continuity of adoption, and practices are tailored to the needs of the target population, taking into account both the mix of technologies and existing farmer resource constraints.
在南部非洲采用农业生态集约化做法:科学回顾
许多国际政策和学术界已经探讨了气候变化对家庭生计结果的影响,如粮食和营养安全、家庭收入和家庭复原力。然而,很少有人关注理解文献是如何构建农业生态集约化实践的采用驱动因素的,这是本研究所涉及的一个领域。本综述综合了关于种植如何影响南部非洲作物产量、粮食和营养安全、家庭收入和减贫的现有文献。我们系统地回顾了45项关于收养驱动因素及其对家庭生计结果的相关影响的实证研究。影响采用农业生态集约化做法的变量包括降雨分布和温度、非农业经济活动、土壤肥力状况、市场准入、通讯设备所有权、牲畜所有权、户主年龄、户主性别、家庭规模、生产要素和财富状况。经审查的大多数出版物发现,生态农业集约化做法的使用与作物产量、粮食和营养安全、家庭收入和减贫之间存在正相关关系。因此,建议农业干预措施的设计方式应使农民具有主人主人感,以确保采用的连续性,并根据目标人口的需要量身定制实践,同时考虑到技术组合和现有农民资源限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Cogent Food & Agriculture AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信