Features of the criminal legal characteristics of crimes attacking objects of intellectual property created with the use of information technologies and technologies of artificial intelligence

Sergey N. Titov
{"title":"Features of the criminal legal characteristics of crimes attacking objects of intellectual property created with the use of information technologies and technologies of artificial intelligence","authors":"Sergey N. Titov","doi":"10.34216/1998-0817-2023-29-2-205-211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the issues of criminal law protection of objects created by artificial intelligence. Currently, there is a legislative vacuum both in regulating the activities of artificial intelligence in general, and in matters of criminal liability for the use of these objects. The author highlights two aspects of the designated problem. First, a decision is needed regarding the possibility of recognising the algorithm as the author of the work it creates and, accordingly, fixing the copyright on this object. Secondly, it is required to study the features of objective and subjective signs of criminal acts in relation to such works. Considering the problem in the context of the theory of intellectual property and the social conditionality of the criminal law protection of intellectual property objects, the author comes to the conclusion that at present there are no grounds for recognising artificial intelligence systems as authors of works. However, the exclusive rights to such objects should belong to the owners of the algorithms. Accordingly, such results of the work of artificial intelligence can be recognised as the subject of crimes against intellectual property. Based on this position, the author describes the features of the criminal law characteristics of crimes against objects created by artificial intelligence, and defines these crimes as committed with direct intent on a large scale, illegal use of an intellectual property object or disclosure of the essence of an industrial property object created using information technologies and artificial intelligence technologies.","PeriodicalId":498361,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni N.A. Nekrasova","volume":"263 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni N.A. Nekrasova","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2023-29-2-205-211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issues of criminal law protection of objects created by artificial intelligence. Currently, there is a legislative vacuum both in regulating the activities of artificial intelligence in general, and in matters of criminal liability for the use of these objects. The author highlights two aspects of the designated problem. First, a decision is needed regarding the possibility of recognising the algorithm as the author of the work it creates and, accordingly, fixing the copyright on this object. Secondly, it is required to study the features of objective and subjective signs of criminal acts in relation to such works. Considering the problem in the context of the theory of intellectual property and the social conditionality of the criminal law protection of intellectual property objects, the author comes to the conclusion that at present there are no grounds for recognising artificial intelligence systems as authors of works. However, the exclusive rights to such objects should belong to the owners of the algorithms. Accordingly, such results of the work of artificial intelligence can be recognised as the subject of crimes against intellectual property. Based on this position, the author describes the features of the criminal law characteristics of crimes against objects created by artificial intelligence, and defines these crimes as committed with direct intent on a large scale, illegal use of an intellectual property object or disclosure of the essence of an industrial property object created using information technologies and artificial intelligence technologies.
利用信息技术和人工智能技术创造的侵犯知识产权客体犯罪的刑事法律特征
本文主要探讨人工智能创造物的刑法保护问题。目前,无论是在规范人工智能的一般活动方面,还是在使用这些物体的刑事责任方面,都存在立法真空。作者强调了指定问题的两个方面。首先,需要决定是否有可能将算法识别为它所创造的作品的作者,并相应地确定该对象的版权。其次,需要研究与此类作品相关的犯罪行为的客观标志和主观标志的特征。在知识产权理论和刑法对知识产权客体保护的社会条件性背景下,笔者认为目前还没有将人工智能系统认定为作品作者的依据。但是,对这些对象的专有权应该属于算法的所有者。因此,人工智能的工作成果可以被认定为侵犯知识产权罪的主体。基于这一立场,作者描述了针对人工智能创造的客体犯罪的刑法特征,并将其定义为具有直接意图的大规模犯罪、非法使用知识产权客体或泄露利用信息技术和人工智能技术创造的工业产权客体的本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信