Ally See or Ally Do: Rewarding Corporate Social Responsibility Through Purchasing

Madison Will, Kevin R. Carriere
{"title":"Ally See or Ally Do: Rewarding Corporate Social Responsibility Through Purchasing","authors":"Madison Will, Kevin R. Carriere","doi":"10.24839/2325-7342.jn28.4.256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporate social responsibility is an organization’s obligation to be aware of its impact on different aspects of society (e.g., social, environmental, economic). Many companies utilize hashtags, trends, and popular social movements to signal allyship, yet this may be a marketing ploy. Do consumers acknowledge the difference between performative activism and substantial activism? In this study, 198 participants (M = 38.8 years old, SD = 11.5 years) rated companies’ perceived support of social issues and their willingness to shop based on different levels of performative and substantive activism. Results showed that consumers were most willing to shop at companies exhibiting substantial activism over and above performative activism (d = 0.39) due to perceiving them as supportive of the issue (d = 0.98), finding evidence for full mediation (indirect CI [.24, .63]). These results were independent of the type of topic and personal beliefs of the participants. This research helps understand how individuals make purchasing decisions and how corporate social responsibility has become more crucial for organizations to elevate their relationships with customers.","PeriodicalId":495523,"journal":{"name":"Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24839/2325-7342.jn28.4.256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility is an organization’s obligation to be aware of its impact on different aspects of society (e.g., social, environmental, economic). Many companies utilize hashtags, trends, and popular social movements to signal allyship, yet this may be a marketing ploy. Do consumers acknowledge the difference between performative activism and substantial activism? In this study, 198 participants (M = 38.8 years old, SD = 11.5 years) rated companies’ perceived support of social issues and their willingness to shop based on different levels of performative and substantive activism. Results showed that consumers were most willing to shop at companies exhibiting substantial activism over and above performative activism (d = 0.39) due to perceiving them as supportive of the issue (d = 0.98), finding evidence for full mediation (indirect CI [.24, .63]). These results were independent of the type of topic and personal beliefs of the participants. This research helps understand how individuals make purchasing decisions and how corporate social responsibility has become more crucial for organizations to elevate their relationships with customers.
合作看还是合作做:通过购买回馈企业社会责任
企业社会责任是一个组织意识到其对社会不同方面(如社会、环境、经济)的影响的义务。许多公司利用话题标签、趋势和流行的社会运动来表明盟友关系,但这可能是一种营销策略。消费者是否承认行为行动主义和实质行动主义之间的区别?在本研究中,198名参与者(M = 38.8岁,SD = 11.5岁)对公司对社会问题的感知支持和他们基于不同程度的表现性和实质性行动主义的购物意愿进行了评分。结果显示,消费者最愿意在表现出实质行动主义的公司购物,而不是表现行动主义(d = 0.39),因为他们认为这些公司支持问题(d = 0.98),这发现了完全中介的证据(间接CI[。24点)。这些结果与主题类型和参与者的个人信仰无关。这项研究有助于理解个人是如何做出购买决定的,以及企业社会责任对企业提升与客户关系的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信