Publicism of F.M.Dostoevsky and A.I. Solzhenitsyn: From socialism to the “Russian idea”

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ludmila P. Gromova, Kseniya A. Kulko
{"title":"Publicism of F.M.Dostoevsky and A.I. Solzhenitsyn: From socialism to the “Russian idea”","authors":"Ludmila P. Gromova, Kseniya A. Kulko","doi":"10.21638/spbu09.2023.202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to describe the socio-political and philosophical views of Dostoevsky and Solzhenitsyn on socialism and the “Russian idea”. The empirical basis of the study is publications from Dostoevsky’s “Diary of the Writer”, as well as articles, interviews, speeches at press conferences by Solzhenitsyn. The study is divided into several parts: 1) analysis of thе views of Dostoevsky and Solzhenitsyn’s youth; 2) socialism as the antithesis of Christianity; 3) transformation of socialist ideas; 4) understanding of the “Russian idea”. Dostoevsky’s “Diary of the Writer presented not a rejection of socialist ideas, but a critique of the European version of socialism and an understanding of “Russian socialism”. This becomes the basis for the formulation of the “Russian idea”, associated for Dostoevsky with the conviction that the Russian nation must bring true Orthodoxy to other nations. The novelty of research is that it presents a comparative analysis of Dostoevsky’s and Solzhenitsyn’s ideas about socialism, messianism, the “Russian idea”, and the fate of Russian people. These ideas are reflected in the authors’ publicism related to the issues of Russian pochvennichesvo. Solzhenitsyn argues about the fate of the people and its task. However, the “Russian idea” becomes “the preservation of people” and the rejection of global objectives. At the same time, these calls and Christian ideals are paradoxically combined in the work of Solzhenitsyn with a love for the revolution and the demand to fight communism in the USSR.","PeriodicalId":41205,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Yazyk i Literatura","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Yazyk i Literatura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2023.202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to describe the socio-political and philosophical views of Dostoevsky and Solzhenitsyn on socialism and the “Russian idea”. The empirical basis of the study is publications from Dostoevsky’s “Diary of the Writer”, as well as articles, interviews, speeches at press conferences by Solzhenitsyn. The study is divided into several parts: 1) analysis of thе views of Dostoevsky and Solzhenitsyn’s youth; 2) socialism as the antithesis of Christianity; 3) transformation of socialist ideas; 4) understanding of the “Russian idea”. Dostoevsky’s “Diary of the Writer presented not a rejection of socialist ideas, but a critique of the European version of socialism and an understanding of “Russian socialism”. This becomes the basis for the formulation of the “Russian idea”, associated for Dostoevsky with the conviction that the Russian nation must bring true Orthodoxy to other nations. The novelty of research is that it presents a comparative analysis of Dostoevsky’s and Solzhenitsyn’s ideas about socialism, messianism, the “Russian idea”, and the fate of Russian people. These ideas are reflected in the authors’ publicism related to the issues of Russian pochvennichesvo. Solzhenitsyn argues about the fate of the people and its task. However, the “Russian idea” becomes “the preservation of people” and the rejection of global objectives. At the same time, these calls and Christian ideals are paradoxically combined in the work of Solzhenitsyn with a love for the revolution and the demand to fight communism in the USSR.
陀思妥耶夫斯基和索尔仁尼琴的公共主义:从社会主义到“俄国思想”
本文的目的是描述陀思妥耶夫斯基和索尔仁尼琴对社会主义和“俄罗斯思想”的社会政治和哲学观点。该研究的实证基础是陀思妥耶夫斯基的《作家日记》中的出版物,以及索尔仁尼琴的文章、采访和新闻发布会演讲。本研究分为几个部分:1)分析陀思妥耶夫斯基和索尔仁尼琴的青年观;2)社会主义作为基督教的对立面;(3)转变社会主义思想;4)对“俄罗斯思想”的理解。陀思妥耶夫斯基的《作家日记》并不是对社会主义思想的拒绝,而是对欧洲版本的社会主义的批判和对“俄国社会主义”的理解。这成为“俄罗斯思想”形成的基础,对陀思妥耶夫斯基来说,这与俄罗斯民族必须把真正的东正教带给其他民族的信念联系在一起。这项研究的新颖之处在于,它对陀思妥耶夫斯基和索尔仁尼琴关于社会主义、弥赛亚主义、“俄罗斯思想”和俄罗斯人民命运的观点进行了比较分析。这些思想反映在作者对俄罗斯波切维尼切斯沃问题的宣传主义上。索尔仁尼琴论述了人民的命运及其任务。然而,“俄罗斯理念”变成了“保护人民”和拒绝全球目标。与此同时,在索尔仁尼琴的作品中,这些呼吁和基督教理想与对革命的热爱和对苏联共产主义的斗争的要求矛盾地结合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信