Comparison between Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection with Physiotherapy and Corticosteroid Injection Alone in Management of Early Stage Frozen Shoulders: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Md. Nasiruddin Md. Nasiruddin, Mushfique Manjur, Md. Sazzadul Haque, Md. Jafrul Islam, Md. Alamgir Hossain
{"title":"Comparison between Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection with Physiotherapy and Corticosteroid Injection Alone in Management of Early Stage Frozen Shoulders: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Md. Nasiruddin Md. Nasiruddin, Mushfique Manjur, Md. Sazzadul Haque, Md. Jafrul Islam, Md. Alamgir Hossain","doi":"10.36347/sjams.2023.v11i10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Frozen shoulder (FS) is the most prevalent cause of shoulder pain and impairment, affecting 2-4% of all adults. As an appropriate strategy of treatment for FS, supportive physiotherapy treatment (PT) and exercises within the limits of pain has been recommended. Objective: To compare between intra-articular corticosteroid injection with physiotherapy and corticosteroid injection alone in the management of early-stage frozen shoulder. Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial study was done among 23 patients with symptoms of early-stage (stage I or II) FS in the Department of Orthopedics, Monno Medical College Hospital from July to December 2022. Two groups were formed out of all the patients. While the other group (non-PT) did not receive any additional physiotherapy treatment, one group did. A follow-up was planned for weeks 6, 12, and 26. Results: Patients who had symptoms for ≥6 months was significantly higher in PT group (81.8%) in comparison to non-PT group (p<0.05). Patients who took physiotherapy treatment was significantly higher in PT group (72.7%) in comparison to non-PT group (p<0.05). The median total SPADI scores in the PT group at baseline, which were 82 (IQR: 35-86) and in the non-PT group, which were 80 (IQR: 65-87), showed the significant pain and limitations of frozen shoulder (FS) in its early stages. Both therapy groups significantly improved at the primary endpoint of 6 weeks for SPADI scores (p<0.05). At 6 weeks compared to baseline, passive ROM increased significantly (p<0.05). Each of the three ROM orientations showed significant changes in favor of the PT group after 12 weeks (p<0.05). At 6 weeks after baseline, both pain scores and Rand-36 physical component scale scores significantly increased (p<0.05). Conclusion: In the first 12 weeks of the early stage of frozen shoulder, physiotherapy in addition to corticosteroid injection improves range of motion (ROM) and functional mobility limitations compared ............","PeriodicalId":471520,"journal":{"name":"Scholars journal of applied medical sciences","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars journal of applied medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2023.v11i10.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Frozen shoulder (FS) is the most prevalent cause of shoulder pain and impairment, affecting 2-4% of all adults. As an appropriate strategy of treatment for FS, supportive physiotherapy treatment (PT) and exercises within the limits of pain has been recommended. Objective: To compare between intra-articular corticosteroid injection with physiotherapy and corticosteroid injection alone in the management of early-stage frozen shoulder. Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial study was done among 23 patients with symptoms of early-stage (stage I or II) FS in the Department of Orthopedics, Monno Medical College Hospital from July to December 2022. Two groups were formed out of all the patients. While the other group (non-PT) did not receive any additional physiotherapy treatment, one group did. A follow-up was planned for weeks 6, 12, and 26. Results: Patients who had symptoms for ≥6 months was significantly higher in PT group (81.8%) in comparison to non-PT group (p<0.05). Patients who took physiotherapy treatment was significantly higher in PT group (72.7%) in comparison to non-PT group (p<0.05). The median total SPADI scores in the PT group at baseline, which were 82 (IQR: 35-86) and in the non-PT group, which were 80 (IQR: 65-87), showed the significant pain and limitations of frozen shoulder (FS) in its early stages. Both therapy groups significantly improved at the primary endpoint of 6 weeks for SPADI scores (p<0.05). At 6 weeks compared to baseline, passive ROM increased significantly (p<0.05). Each of the three ROM orientations showed significant changes in favor of the PT group after 12 weeks (p<0.05). At 6 weeks after baseline, both pain scores and Rand-36 physical component scale scores significantly increased (p<0.05). Conclusion: In the first 12 weeks of the early stage of frozen shoulder, physiotherapy in addition to corticosteroid injection improves range of motion (ROM) and functional mobility limitations compared ............
关节内注射皮质类固醇联合物理治疗与单独注射皮质类固醇治疗早期肩周炎的比较:一项随机临床试验
简介:肩周炎(FS)是肩关节疼痛和损伤最常见的原因,影响了2-4%的成年人。作为FS的适当治疗策略,支持物理治疗(PT)和在疼痛范围内的运动被推荐。目的:比较关节内注射皮质类固醇联合物理治疗与单纯注射皮质类固醇治疗早期肩周炎的疗效。方法:本前瞻性随机临床试验研究于2022年7月至12月在Monno医学院附属医院骨科进行23例早期(I期或II期)FS患者的临床研究。从所有病人中分成两组。而另一组(非pt)没有接受任何额外的物理治疗,一组接受了。随访时间为第6、12和26周。结果:PT组出现症状≥6个月的患者(81.8%)明显高于非PT组(p < 0.05)。PT组接受物理治疗的患者(72.7%)明显高于非PT组(p < 0.05)。在基线时,PT组的SPADI总分中位数为82 (IQR: 35-86),而非PT组的SPADI总分中位数为80 (IQR: 65-87),这表明在早期阶段,冻结肩(FS)存在明显的疼痛和局限性。两个治疗组在主要终点6周时SPADI评分均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。6周时,与基线相比,被动ROM显著增加(p < 0.05)。12周后,三种ROM方向均表现出有利于PT组的显著变化(p < 0.05)。基线后6周,疼痛评分和Rand-36身体成分评分均显著升高(p < 0.05)。结论:与............相比,在肩周炎早期的前12周,物理治疗加皮质类固醇注射可改善活动度(ROM)和功能活动受限
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信