Joy at work turns to sorrow at home: The influence of flow experience on work–family conflict and a three-way interaction effect

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Xingyu Feng, Ping Han, Jane Terpstra Tong
{"title":"Joy at work turns to sorrow at home: The influence of flow experience on work–family conflict and a three-way interaction effect","authors":"Xingyu Feng,&nbsp;Ping Han,&nbsp;Jane Terpstra Tong","doi":"10.1111/apps.12500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite convincing evidence suggesting that organizations benefit from employees' flow states, when and how work flow experience generates negative effects remain largely understudied. By integrating the spillover-crossover model and perseverative cognition theory, we established a model to explain how flow experience induces employees' positive rumination after work (i.e., problem-solving pondering), which ultimately results in work–family conflict. We proposed that mindfulness acts as a buffer factor in this process but further elucidated that work–family segmentation preference serves as a boundary that may alter or even completely reverse the original effects of mindfulness. Our experience sampling method yielded 1425 data points from 186 employees and their family members across 10 workdays in China, and multilevel analyses supported our propositions. We identified the mediating role of problem-solving pondering in transmitting the effects of flow to work–family conflict. Additionally, we confirmed the three-way interaction effect among mindfulness, segmentation preference, and flow. Specifically, the harmful effect of flow is assuaged when segmentation preference and mindfulness are both high. However, flow experience causes severe work–family conflict when mindfulness is high and segmentation preference is low. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"73 2","pages":"801-829"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.12500","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12500","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite convincing evidence suggesting that organizations benefit from employees' flow states, when and how work flow experience generates negative effects remain largely understudied. By integrating the spillover-crossover model and perseverative cognition theory, we established a model to explain how flow experience induces employees' positive rumination after work (i.e., problem-solving pondering), which ultimately results in work–family conflict. We proposed that mindfulness acts as a buffer factor in this process but further elucidated that work–family segmentation preference serves as a boundary that may alter or even completely reverse the original effects of mindfulness. Our experience sampling method yielded 1425 data points from 186 employees and their family members across 10 workdays in China, and multilevel analyses supported our propositions. We identified the mediating role of problem-solving pondering in transmitting the effects of flow to work–family conflict. Additionally, we confirmed the three-way interaction effect among mindfulness, segmentation preference, and flow. Specifically, the harmful effect of flow is assuaged when segmentation preference and mindfulness are both high. However, flow experience causes severe work–family conflict when mindfulness is high and segmentation preference is low. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed.

Abstract Image

工作中的快乐变成了家庭中的悲伤:流动体验对工作与家庭冲突的影响以及三方互动效应
尽管有令人信服的证据表明,组织能从员工的流动状态中获益,但对工作流动体验何时以及如何产生负面影响的研究在很大程度上仍然不足。通过整合溢出-交叉模型和锲而不舍认知理论,我们建立了一个模型来解释流动体验如何诱发员工下班后的积极反刍(即问题解决思考),并最终导致工作-家庭冲突。我们提出,正念在这一过程中起着缓冲因素的作用,但进一步阐明,工作-家庭分割偏好作为一个边界,可能会改变甚至完全逆转正念的原始效应。我们的经验取样方法获得了来自中国 186 名员工及其家庭成员在 10 个工作日中的 1425 个数据点,多层次分析支持了我们的命题。我们确定了问题解决思考在将 "流动 "效应传递到工作-家庭冲突中的中介作用。此外,我们还证实了正念、细分偏好和流动之间的三方交互效应。具体来说,当细分偏好和正念都很高时,流动的有害影响会得到缓解。然而,当正念高而细分偏好低时,流动体验会导致严重的工作-家庭冲突。讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信