Education for Tobacco Use Disorder Treatment: Current State, Evidence, and Unmet Needs

IF 1.7 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Anne C. Melzer, Zachary A. Reese, Lorraine Mascarhenas, Caitlin B. Clancy, Janaki Deepak, Hyma Gogineni, Yaron Gesthalter, Joanna L. Hart
{"title":"Education for Tobacco Use Disorder Treatment: Current State, Evidence, and Unmet Needs","authors":"Anne C. Melzer, Zachary A. Reese, Lorraine Mascarhenas, Caitlin B. Clancy, Janaki Deepak, Hyma Gogineni, Yaron Gesthalter, Joanna L. Hart","doi":"10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0131re","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tobacco use is undertreated in the medical setting. One driver may be inadequate tobacco use disorder treatment (TUDT) training for clinicians in specialties treating tobacco-dependent patients. Objective: We sought to evaluate the current state of TUDT training for diverse professionals and how these skills are assessed in credentialing exams. Methods: We performed a focused review of current educational practices, evidence-based strategies, and accreditation exam contents focused on TUDT. Results: Among medical students, participants in reviewed studies reported anywhere from 45 minutes to 3 hours of TUDT training throughout their 4-year programs, most often in the form of didactic sessions. Similarly, little TUDT training was reported at the post-graduate (residency, fellowship, continuing medical education) levels, and reported training was typically delivered as time-based (expected hours of instruction) rather than competency-based (demonstration of mastery) learning. Multiple studies evaluated effective TUDT curricula at varied stages of training. More effective curricula incorporated longitudinal sessions and active learning, such as standardized patient encounters or proctored patient visits. Knowledge of TUDT is minimally evaluated on certification exams. For example, the American Board of Internal Medicine blueprint lists TUDT as <2% of one subtopic on both the internal medicine and pulmonary exams. Conclusion: TUDT training for most clinicians is minimal, does not assess competency, and is minimally evaluated on certification exams. Effective, evidence-based TUDT training incorporating active learning should be integrated into medical education at all levels, with attention paid to inclusion on subsequent certifying exams.","PeriodicalId":72330,"journal":{"name":"ATS scholar","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATS scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0131re","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tobacco use is undertreated in the medical setting. One driver may be inadequate tobacco use disorder treatment (TUDT) training for clinicians in specialties treating tobacco-dependent patients. Objective: We sought to evaluate the current state of TUDT training for diverse professionals and how these skills are assessed in credentialing exams. Methods: We performed a focused review of current educational practices, evidence-based strategies, and accreditation exam contents focused on TUDT. Results: Among medical students, participants in reviewed studies reported anywhere from 45 minutes to 3 hours of TUDT training throughout their 4-year programs, most often in the form of didactic sessions. Similarly, little TUDT training was reported at the post-graduate (residency, fellowship, continuing medical education) levels, and reported training was typically delivered as time-based (expected hours of instruction) rather than competency-based (demonstration of mastery) learning. Multiple studies evaluated effective TUDT curricula at varied stages of training. More effective curricula incorporated longitudinal sessions and active learning, such as standardized patient encounters or proctored patient visits. Knowledge of TUDT is minimally evaluated on certification exams. For example, the American Board of Internal Medicine blueprint lists TUDT as <2% of one subtopic on both the internal medicine and pulmonary exams. Conclusion: TUDT training for most clinicians is minimal, does not assess competency, and is minimally evaluated on certification exams. Effective, evidence-based TUDT training incorporating active learning should be integrated into medical education at all levels, with attention paid to inclusion on subsequent certifying exams.
烟草使用障碍治疗教育:现状、证据和未满足的需求
背景:在医疗环境中,烟草使用未得到充分治疗。一个驱动因素可能是对治疗烟草依赖患者的专业临床医生的烟草使用障碍治疗(TUDT)培训不足。目的:我们试图评估不同专业人员的TUDT培训现状,以及如何在资格考试中评估这些技能。方法:我们对当前的教育实践、循证策略和以tut为重点的认证考试内容进行了重点审查。结果:在医学学生中,被审查研究的参与者报告说,在他们4年的课程中,他们接受了45分钟到3小时的TUDT培训,大多数是以教学形式进行的。同样,据报道,在研究生(住院医师、奖学金、继续医学教育)水平上,很少有TUDT培训,并且报告的培训通常以时间为基础(预期教学时间),而不是以能力为基础(展示掌握程度)的学习。多项研究评估了不同培训阶段的有效TUDT课程。更有效的课程包括纵向会议和主动学习,如标准化的病人接触或监督病人就诊。tut知识在认证考试中被最低限度地评估。例如,美国内科医学委员会的蓝图将TUDT列为内科和肺部检查的一个小主题的<2%。结论:大多数临床医生的TUDT培训是最少的,不评估能力,并且很少在认证考试中进行评估。应将有效的、以证据为基础的、结合主动学习的医检培训纳入各级医学教育,并注意将其纳入随后的认证考试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信