The Heterogeneity of Bioethics: Discussions of Harm, Abortion, and Conceptual Clarity of Bioethical Terminology

IF 1.3 3区哲学 Q3 ETHICS

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1093/jmp/jhad032

Ryan Hrabovsky

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This issue of The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy exemplifies the diverse range of topics that fall under the scope of bioethics and the philosophy of medicine. The eight essays in this number challenge many of the underlying assumptions made in the philosophy of medicine, health care, the abortion debate, the nature of harm, disability, the moral status of human beings, and pandemic lockdown procedures.

查看原文本刊更多论文

生物伦理学的异质性:关于危害、堕胎和生物伦理学术语概念清晰度的讨论

这一期的《医学与哲学杂志》体现了生物伦理学和医学哲学范围内的各种主题。这八篇文章挑战了医学哲学、卫生保健、堕胎辩论、伤害的本质、残疾、人类的道德地位和流行病封锁程序等领域的许多基本假设。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Multiple-

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

6.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： This bimonthly publication explores the shared themes and concerns of philosophy and the medical sciences. Central issues in medical research and practice have important philosophical dimensions, for, in treating disease and promoting health, medicine involves presuppositions about human goals and values. Conversely, the concerns of philosophy often significantly relate to those of medicine, as philosophers seek to understand the nature of medical knowledge and the human condition in the modern world. In addition, recent developments in medical technology and treatment create moral problems that raise important philosophical questions. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy aims to provide an ongoing forum for the discussion of such themes and issues.