The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Netherlands on Primary Healthcare Use and Clinical Outcomes in Persons with Type 2 Diabetes

COVID Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.3390/covid3110115
Jesse M. van den Berg, Marieke T. Blom, Karin M. A. Swart, Jetty A. Overbeek, S. Remmelzwaal, Petra J. M. Elders, Ron M. C. Herings
{"title":"The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Netherlands on Primary Healthcare Use and Clinical Outcomes in Persons with Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"Jesse M. van den Berg, Marieke T. Blom, Karin M. A. Swart, Jetty A. Overbeek, S. Remmelzwaal, Petra J. M. Elders, Ron M. C. Herings","doi":"10.3390/covid3110115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on healthcare systems worldwide, including the postponing or canceling of appointments and procedures for type 2 diabetes (T2D) care by general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary healthcare use and clinical measurements for people with T2D. Additionally, we aimed to determine if changes were observed among specific risk groups: (1) persons 70 years or older, or below 70 years, (2) patients who were meeting their HbA1c targets and those who were not, and (3) patients with high-risk and non-high-risk T2D. This retrospective cohort study among persons with T2D was conducted using data from the DIAbetes MANagement and Treatment (DIAMANT) data infrastructure, deriving data from electronic medical records of Dutch GPs. The study assessed GP visit counts, and counts and values of clinical measurements, including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Adjusted negative binomial (NB) regression and generalized estimating equations (GEE) models were used to estimate GP visit counts and population averages of clinical measurements, respectively, comparing 2019 (pre-pandemic) with 2020 (during the pandemic). Changes in specific groups were examined by stratifying outcomes for the aforementioned subgroups. The cohort consisted of 182,048 patients with T2D (47% female, mean age 69 ± 13 years) on 1 March 2019, of which 168,097 persons (92%) still contributed follow-up data in 2020. We observed an increase in total GP visits in 2020, with an adjusted rate ratio (RR) of 1.09 (95% CI 1.08–1.09). The frequency increased for office visits (RR 1.06; 1.06–1.07) and phone calls (RR 1.33; 1.31–1.35) but remained stable for home visits (RR 1.02; 0.99–1.04). On both population and individual levels, HbA1c values increased in 2020 by 1.65 (1.59–1.70) mmol/mol compared to 2019. Observed changes in 2020 for BMI, LDL, and SBP values were also statistically significant but small. Subgroup stratifications showed higher scores of all clinical measurements in younger persons (<70 years), those who met their HbA1c target, and non-high-risk T2D patients than their respective high-risk subgroups. During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, changes in primary healthcare use were observed among persons with T2D, with an increase in GP office visits and phone calls and a decreased number of clinical measurements and GP home visits. HbA1c levels increased among patients with T2D in 2020. Further research is necessary to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on long-term clinical outcomes and (long-term) T2D complications.","PeriodicalId":72714,"journal":{"name":"COVID","volume":"8 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COVID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/covid3110115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on healthcare systems worldwide, including the postponing or canceling of appointments and procedures for type 2 diabetes (T2D) care by general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary healthcare use and clinical measurements for people with T2D. Additionally, we aimed to determine if changes were observed among specific risk groups: (1) persons 70 years or older, or below 70 years, (2) patients who were meeting their HbA1c targets and those who were not, and (3) patients with high-risk and non-high-risk T2D. This retrospective cohort study among persons with T2D was conducted using data from the DIAbetes MANagement and Treatment (DIAMANT) data infrastructure, deriving data from electronic medical records of Dutch GPs. The study assessed GP visit counts, and counts and values of clinical measurements, including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Adjusted negative binomial (NB) regression and generalized estimating equations (GEE) models were used to estimate GP visit counts and population averages of clinical measurements, respectively, comparing 2019 (pre-pandemic) with 2020 (during the pandemic). Changes in specific groups were examined by stratifying outcomes for the aforementioned subgroups. The cohort consisted of 182,048 patients with T2D (47% female, mean age 69 ± 13 years) on 1 March 2019, of which 168,097 persons (92%) still contributed follow-up data in 2020. We observed an increase in total GP visits in 2020, with an adjusted rate ratio (RR) of 1.09 (95% CI 1.08–1.09). The frequency increased for office visits (RR 1.06; 1.06–1.07) and phone calls (RR 1.33; 1.31–1.35) but remained stable for home visits (RR 1.02; 0.99–1.04). On both population and individual levels, HbA1c values increased in 2020 by 1.65 (1.59–1.70) mmol/mol compared to 2019. Observed changes in 2020 for BMI, LDL, and SBP values were also statistically significant but small. Subgroup stratifications showed higher scores of all clinical measurements in younger persons (<70 years), those who met their HbA1c target, and non-high-risk T2D patients than their respective high-risk subgroups. During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, changes in primary healthcare use were observed among persons with T2D, with an increase in GP office visits and phone calls and a decreased number of clinical measurements and GP home visits. HbA1c levels increased among patients with T2D in 2020. Further research is necessary to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on long-term clinical outcomes and (long-term) T2D complications.
荷兰COVID-19大流行对2型糖尿病患者初级卫生保健使用和临床结果的影响
2019冠状病毒病大流行对全球卫生保健系统产生了重大影响,包括推迟或取消荷兰全科医生对2型糖尿病(T2D)的预约和治疗程序。本研究的目的是调查COVID-19大流行对T2D患者初级卫生保健使用和临床测量的影响。此外,我们的目的是确定在特定风险组中是否观察到变化:(1)70岁或以上或70岁以下的人,(2)达到HbA1c目标的患者和未达到目标的患者,(3)高风险和非高风险T2D患者。这项t2dm患者的回顾性队列研究使用糖尿病管理和治疗(DIAMANT)数据基础设施的数据进行,数据来源于荷兰全科医生的电子医疗记录。该研究评估了全科医生就诊计数,以及临床测量的计数和值,包括血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)、体重指数(BMI)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇和收缩压(SBP)。采用调整后的负二项回归(NB)和广义估计方程(GEE)模型,分别对2019年(大流行前)和2020年(大流行期间)的全科医生就诊次数和临床测量的人口平均值进行了估计。通过上述亚组的分层结果来检查特定组的变化。该队列包括2019年3月1日的182,048例T2D患者(47%为女性,平均年龄69±13岁),其中168,097人(92%)在2020年仍提供随访数据。我们观察到2020年全科医生总就诊人数增加,调整后的比率(RR)为1.09 (95% CI 1.08-1.09)。就诊频率增加(RR 1.06;1.06-1.07)和电话(RR 1.33;1.31-1.35),但家访保持稳定(RR 1.02;0.99 - -1.04)。在群体和个体水平上,2020年的HbA1c值比2019年增加了1.65 (1.59-1.70)mmol/mol。观察到2020年BMI、LDL和收缩压值的变化也有统计学意义,但很小。亚组分层显示,与各自的高风险亚组相比,年轻人(70岁)、达到HbA1c目标的患者和非高风险T2D患者的所有临床测量得分更高。在荷兰COVID-19大流行的第一年,观察到t2dm患者的初级卫生保健使用情况发生了变化,全科医生办公室就诊和电话次数增加,临床测量和全科医生家访次数减少。2020年,T2D患者的HbA1c水平升高。需要进一步研究确定COVID-19大流行对长期临床结果和(长期)T2D并发症的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信