The Importance of Grey and Qualitative Literature in Developing Domestic Violence and Abuse and Child Maltreatment Core Outcome Sets: A Brief Report

IF 2.7 3区心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES

Journal of Family Violence Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1007/s10896-023-00662-z

Claire Powell, Siofra Peeren, Ania Ostrowska, Shehzore Adil, Jamie Botevyle, Heather Chesters, Jeanne Wolstencroft, Emma Yapp, Gene Feder, Ruth Gilbert, Emma Howarth

{"title":"The Importance of Grey and Qualitative Literature in Developing Domestic Violence and Abuse and Child Maltreatment Core Outcome Sets: A Brief Report","authors":"Claire Powell, Siofra Peeren, Ania Ostrowska, Shehzore Adil, Jamie Botevyle, Heather Chesters, Jeanne Wolstencroft, Emma Yapp, Gene Feder, Ruth Gilbert, Emma Howarth","doi":"10.1007/s10896-023-00662-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose Core Outcome Sets (COS) are agreed sets of outcomes to be used in all trials that evaluate the effect of interventions. This report considers the added value of including grey and qualitative literature in a study to identify COSs of family-focused interventions for CM and DVA. Methods We identified outcomes of interventions for DVA or CM through systematically searching 12 academic databases and 86 organisation websites, leading to the inclusion of 485 full-text reports across 6 reviews. We developed a candidate outcome longlist comprising 347 extracted outcomes. Results We identified 87% (282/347) of candidate outcomes from the grey and qualitative literature, and 37% (127/347) from the trial literature. Of the candidate outcomes on the longlist, 22% (75/347) were identified solely from the grey or qualitative literature and 7% (26/347) from trial literature. Three of the eight outcomes in the final core outcome sets may have been missed if grey or qualitative literature had not been searched. Conclusions The qualitative and grey literature adds DVA and CM outcomes that are relevant to survivor perspectives but not reported in trials; this had an impact on the final COSs. It is important for COS developers to consider what they may be missing if they do not search the qualitative and grey literature.","PeriodicalId":48180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Violence","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00662-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Core Outcome Sets (COS) are agreed sets of outcomes to be used in all trials that evaluate the effect of interventions. This report considers the added value of including grey and qualitative literature in a study to identify COSs of family-focused interventions for CM and DVA. Methods We identified outcomes of interventions for DVA or CM through systematically searching 12 academic databases and 86 organisation websites, leading to the inclusion of 485 full-text reports across 6 reviews. We developed a candidate outcome longlist comprising 347 extracted outcomes. Results We identified 87% (282/347) of candidate outcomes from the grey and qualitative literature, and 37% (127/347) from the trial literature. Of the candidate outcomes on the longlist, 22% (75/347) were identified solely from the grey or qualitative literature and 7% (26/347) from trial literature. Three of the eight outcomes in the final core outcome sets may have been missed if grey or qualitative literature had not been searched. Conclusions The qualitative and grey literature adds DVA and CM outcomes that are relevant to survivor perspectives but not reported in trials; this had an impact on the final COSs. It is important for COS developers to consider what they may be missing if they do not search the qualitative and grey literature.

查看原文本刊更多论文

灰色和定性文献在制定家庭暴力和虐待及儿童虐待核心结果集中的重要性:简要报告

目的:核心结局集(COS)是所有评估干预措施效果的试验中使用的商定结局集。本报告考虑了在一项研究中纳入灰色和定性文献的附加价值，以确定以家庭为重点的CM和DVA干预措施的成本。方法通过系统地检索12个学术数据库和86个组织网站，我们确定了DVA或CM的干预结果，并纳入了6篇综述的485篇全文报告。我们开发了一个包含347个提取结果的候选结果长列表。我们从灰色和定性文献中确定了87%(282/347)的候选结局，从试验文献中确定了37%(127/347)的候选结局。在长列表中的候选结果中，22%(75/347)仅从灰色或定性文献中确定，7%(26/347)从试验文献中确定。如果没有搜索灰色或定性文献，最终核心结果集中的八个结果中的三个可能会被遗漏。定性和灰色文献增加了与幸存者视角相关的DVA和CM结果，但未在试验中报道;这对最终的cos有影响。对于COS开发人员来说，重要的是要考虑如果他们不搜索定性和灰色文献，他们可能会错过什么。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Family Violence Multiple-

CiteScore

7.00

自引率

10.50%

发文量

121

期刊介绍： The Journal of Family Violence (JOFV) is a peer-reviewed publication committed to the dissemination of rigorous research on preventing, ending, and ameliorating all forms of family violence. JOFV welcomes scholarly articles related to the broad categories of child abuse and maltreatment, dating violence, domestic and partner violence, and elder abuse. Within these categories, JOFV emphasizes research on physical violence, psychological violence, sexual violence, and homicides that occur in families. Studies on families in all their various forms and diversities are welcome. JOFV publishes studies using quantitative, qualitative, and/or mixed methods involving the collection of primary data. Rigorous systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and theoretical analyses are also welcome. To help advance scientific understandings of family violence, JOFV is especially interested in research using transdisciplinary perspectives and innovative research methods. Because family violence is a global problem requiring solutions from diverse disciplinary perspectives, JOFV strongly encourages submissions from scholars worldwide from all disciplines and backgrounds.