[Comparative study of the modification of blood, blood coagulation, cardiovascular circulation by 3% modified, fluid gelatins and 6% low-molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch].

H B Hopf, H P Siepmann
{"title":"[Comparative study of the modification of blood, blood coagulation, cardiovascular circulation by 3% modified, fluid gelatins and 6% low-molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch].","authors":"H B Hopf,&nbsp;H P Siepmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A randomized, comparative study with 3% modified fluid gelatine and 6% low molecular hydroxyethylstarch has been made on 87 patients of an intensive care unit. Both plasma substitutes were well compatible to the patients. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate was accelerated significantly by both plasma substitutes. This effect was at a maximum after 24 h and in the gelatine group it was percental about three times stronger, referred to the base line level in this group. In the hydroxyethylstarch group after 12 h the thrombocyte cell number decreased about 10.3%, referred to the base line, in the gelatine group the decrease was only 1.5% at the same time. At the chemical parameters there were no more differences between the two substitutes. Both plasma substitutes showed a mean effect of 4 h on plasma volume, referred to the changes of central venous pressure. The gelatine substitute showed a significant rise in blood pressure after end of infusion, the hydroxyethylstarch substitute did not. Both substitutes showed a rise in diuresis with a delay of 1 h. There were no differences between both solutions in the diuretic effect after infusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":75931,"journal":{"name":"Infusionstherapie und klinische Ernahrung","volume":"14 Suppl 2 ","pages":"31-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusionstherapie und klinische Ernahrung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A randomized, comparative study with 3% modified fluid gelatine and 6% low molecular hydroxyethylstarch has been made on 87 patients of an intensive care unit. Both plasma substitutes were well compatible to the patients. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate was accelerated significantly by both plasma substitutes. This effect was at a maximum after 24 h and in the gelatine group it was percental about three times stronger, referred to the base line level in this group. In the hydroxyethylstarch group after 12 h the thrombocyte cell number decreased about 10.3%, referred to the base line, in the gelatine group the decrease was only 1.5% at the same time. At the chemical parameters there were no more differences between the two substitutes. Both plasma substitutes showed a mean effect of 4 h on plasma volume, referred to the changes of central venous pressure. The gelatine substitute showed a significant rise in blood pressure after end of infusion, the hydroxyethylstarch substitute did not. Both substitutes showed a rise in diuresis with a delay of 1 h. There were no differences between both solutions in the diuretic effect after infusion.

【3%改性液体明胶与6%低分子量羟乙基淀粉对血液、凝血、心血管循环的改性比较研究】。
对重症监护室的87例患者进行了一项随机对照研究,研究对象为3%改性液体明胶和6%低分子羟乙基淀粉。两种血浆代用品对患者均具有良好的相容性。两种血浆代用品均能显著加快红细胞沉降速率。这种效果在24小时后达到最大值,在明胶组中,其百分比约为该组基线水平的三倍。羟乙基淀粉组在12 h后血小板细胞数量下降约10.3%(参照基线),而明胶组同期仅下降1.5%。在化学参数上,两种替代品之间没有更多的差异。根据中心静脉压的变化,两种血浆代用品对血浆容量的平均影响均为4 h。明胶替代品在输注结束后血压明显升高,羟乙基淀粉替代品则无明显升高。两种代用品的利尿作用均延迟1 h,两种溶液输注后的利尿作用无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信