Therapists' and counsellors' perceptions and experiences of offering online therapy during COVID-19: A qualitative survey

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Wayne Full, Andreas Vossler, Naomi Moller, Jo Pybis, Jeannette Roddy
{"title":"Therapists' and counsellors' perceptions and experiences of offering online therapy during COVID-19: A qualitative survey","authors":"Wayne Full,&nbsp;Andreas Vossler,&nbsp;Naomi Moller,&nbsp;Jo Pybis,&nbsp;Jeannette Roddy","doi":"10.1002/capr.12707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this research was to understand counsellors' and therapists' perceptions and experiences of working online during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Five hundred and ninety clinicians, mostly UK-based, responded to an online qualitative survey, which allowed data to be gathered from a broader range of participants than is typical for qualitative interviews or focus group studies, and provided a wide-angle lens. The survey generated over 130,000 words, on which a five-staged framework analysis was conducted. Seven superordinate themes were identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In this paper, three of these superordinate themes specifically addressing online therapeutic practice with individual adult clients are presented. Therapists' accounts addressed the diverse ways in which the online space changed how they thought about the therapy relationship and their interactions with clients. Respondents described instances where online therapy had been beneficial for facilitating and cultivating the therapeutic process and relationship as well as how online therapy could have a potentially disruptive impact on therapeutic practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>For practitioners who continue to deliver therapy solely online and/or offer hybrid services, this study identifies the specific knowledge and skills required for effective and safe online therapeutic work.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this research was to understand counsellors' and therapists' perceptions and experiences of working online during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method

Five hundred and ninety clinicians, mostly UK-based, responded to an online qualitative survey, which allowed data to be gathered from a broader range of participants than is typical for qualitative interviews or focus group studies, and provided a wide-angle lens. The survey generated over 130,000 words, on which a five-staged framework analysis was conducted. Seven superordinate themes were identified.

Results

In this paper, three of these superordinate themes specifically addressing online therapeutic practice with individual adult clients are presented. Therapists' accounts addressed the diverse ways in which the online space changed how they thought about the therapy relationship and their interactions with clients. Respondents described instances where online therapy had been beneficial for facilitating and cultivating the therapeutic process and relationship as well as how online therapy could have a potentially disruptive impact on therapeutic practice.

Implications

For practitioners who continue to deliver therapy solely online and/or offer hybrid services, this study identifies the specific knowledge and skills required for effective and safe online therapeutic work.

治疗师和辅导员对 COVID-19 期间提供在线治疗的看法和经验:定性调查
目标 本研究旨在了解辅导员和治疗师对 COVID-19 大流行期间在线工作的看法和经验。 方法 五百九十名临床医生(大部分来自英国)对一项在线定性调查做出了回应,与典型的定性访谈或焦点小组研究相比,该调查能够从更广泛的参与者那里收集数据,并提供了一个广角镜头。该调查产生了 130,000 多字的内容,并在此基础上进行了五阶段框架分析。最终确定了七个上位主题。 结果 本文介绍了其中三个专门针对成人客户的在线治疗实践的超级主题。治疗师们的叙述涉及了网络空间改变他们对治疗关系的思考以及与客户互动的各种方式。受访者描述了在线治疗有利于促进和培养治疗过程和关系的情况,以及在线治疗如何对治疗实践产生潜在的破坏性影响。 启示 对于继续完全通过网络提供治疗和/或提供混合服务的从业人员来说,本研究确定了有效和安全的网络治疗工作所需的特定知识和技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信