The THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MERDEKA BELAJAR KAMPUS MERDEKA (MBKM) INTERNSHIP PROGRAM IN SOCIOLOGY STUDY PROGRAM, FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, STATE UNIVERSITY OF JAKARTA

Atik Kurniawati, Meila Riskia Fitri, Marista Christina S. K, Dicky Saputra, Revania Firdaus
{"title":"The THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MERDEKA BELAJAR KAMPUS MERDEKA (MBKM) INTERNSHIP PROGRAM IN SOCIOLOGY STUDY PROGRAM, FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, STATE UNIVERSITY OF JAKARTA","authors":"Atik Kurniawati, Meila Riskia Fitri, Marista Christina S. K, Dicky Saputra, Revania Firdaus","doi":"10.21009/jisae.v9i2.37706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the independent internship program organized by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology within the Sociology Study Program, Faculty of Social Sciences, State University of Jakarta using the CIPP evaluation model. The CIPP evaluation model focuses on 4 aspects, namely Context, Input, Process, Product. The type of approach used is a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and literature studies. The results of this study show that based on: (1) Context evaluation is still not optimal, because the involvement of Sociology students only ranges from 15% of batches 1-4 and in batch 4, especially the class of 2020, there are only 4 students who pass the Independent Internship program. Then the vision, mission, and objectives of the Sociology study program are considered to be in accordance with the objectives of the implementation of the Independent Internship program. (2) Input evaluation has been going well, due to the availability of human resources, facilities, and budget funds that are well met. Preparation for the implementation of the Independent Internship has also been well prepared by the Sociology study program and the company, and has had good quality human resources and are competent in their fields. (3) The evaluation process has run well, because it is supported by the study program and participants also have a high level of satisfaction with the Independent Internship program, both from experience, mentors, nor work. Then the effectiveness of excellent mentor assistance makes participants have no significant obstacles in the registration process until the internship program ends. (4) Product evaluation has also been carried out well, because this Independent Internship program can significantly improve the abilities and skills of participants. In addition, participants gain direct work experience and are actively involved in the company, so that participants get professional relationships and clear career paths.","PeriodicalId":492154,"journal":{"name":"JISAE (Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JISAE (Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v9i2.37706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the independent internship program organized by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology within the Sociology Study Program, Faculty of Social Sciences, State University of Jakarta using the CIPP evaluation model. The CIPP evaluation model focuses on 4 aspects, namely Context, Input, Process, Product. The type of approach used is a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and literature studies. The results of this study show that based on: (1) Context evaluation is still not optimal, because the involvement of Sociology students only ranges from 15% of batches 1-4 and in batch 4, especially the class of 2020, there are only 4 students who pass the Independent Internship program. Then the vision, mission, and objectives of the Sociology study program are considered to be in accordance with the objectives of the implementation of the Independent Internship program. (2) Input evaluation has been going well, due to the availability of human resources, facilities, and budget funds that are well met. Preparation for the implementation of the Independent Internship has also been well prepared by the Sociology study program and the company, and has had good quality human resources and are competent in their fields. (3) The evaluation process has run well, because it is supported by the study program and participants also have a high level of satisfaction with the Independent Internship program, both from experience, mentors, nor work. Then the effectiveness of excellent mentor assistance makes participants have no significant obstacles in the registration process until the internship program ends. (4) Product evaluation has also been carried out well, because this Independent Internship program can significantly improve the abilities and skills of participants. In addition, participants gain direct work experience and are actively involved in the company, so that participants get professional relationships and clear career paths.
雅加达国立大学社会科学学院社会学研究项目中默迪卡BELAJAR KAMPUS默迪卡(MBKM)实习计划的实施
本研究旨在利用CIPP评估模型,评估雅加达国立大学社会科学学院社会学研究计划中由教育、文化、研究和技术部组织的独立实习计划的实施情况。CIPP评价模型关注4个方面,即上下文、输入、过程、产品。使用的方法类型是描述性定性方法,通过观察,访谈和文献研究收集数据技术。本研究结果表明:(1)情境评价仍不理想,因为社会学学生的参与率仅在1-4批的15%左右,而在第4批,特别是2020级,只有4名学生通过了独立实习计划。然后,社会学研究计划的愿景,使命和目标被认为是按照独立实习计划的实施目标。(2)投入评价进展顺利,人力资源、设施和预算资金都得到了很好的满足。实施独立实习的准备工作也得到了社会学学习项目和公司的充分准备,并拥有优质的人力资源和在各自领域的能力。(3)评估过程运行良好,因为它得到了学习计划的支持,参与者对独立实习计划也有很高的满意度,无论是从经验、导师还是工作方面。然后,优秀导师帮助的有效性使参与者在注册过程中没有明显的障碍,直到实习项目结束。(4)产品评价也做得很好,因为这个独立实习项目可以显著提高参与者的能力和技能。此外,参与者获得直接的工作经验,并积极参与公司事务,因此参与者获得专业关系和清晰的职业道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书