Participatory action research: Developing a collaborative approach to modern slavery research with survivors of exploitation

Q1 Social Sciences
Rachel Keighley, Teela Sanders, Lauren Saunders, Hilary Agg
{"title":"Participatory action research: Developing a collaborative approach to modern slavery research with survivors of exploitation","authors":"Rachel Keighley, Teela Sanders, Lauren Saunders, Hilary Agg","doi":"10.1177/20597991231208441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper offers best practice guidance on participatory action research (PAR) methods in modern slavery studies, through sharing the experiences of survivors of modern slavery as active project consultants. By using participatory approaches and engaging in an action learning set model, this paper aims to understand how to meaningfully engage survivors of modern slavery as co-researchers. Inclusion was at the heart of this research study, and thus, this paper was co-produced by survivors of modern slavery. Through their voices, and by engaging in reflexivity, we share the challenges of engaging in meaningful peer research methods, lessons learned as well as the benefits of adopting this approach to provide creative, engaging and empowering opportunities for participation in research and skill development. We share some examples of challenges and successes in our approach to understand what meaningful peer research methods look like, addressing conservative and more liberal views including academic expertise, safeguarding and empowerment. In concluding this paper, we provide some recommendations for best practice, recognising a continual need to reflect and adapt peer research approaches that suits the needs of the peer researchers as well as the subject to be studied. The overwhelming sentiment, is that social science research must look to engage in peer research methods, recognising the expertise of lived experience, and the potential for research to empower others while also creating meaningful change.","PeriodicalId":32579,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Innovations","volume":"108 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methodological Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991231208441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper offers best practice guidance on participatory action research (PAR) methods in modern slavery studies, through sharing the experiences of survivors of modern slavery as active project consultants. By using participatory approaches and engaging in an action learning set model, this paper aims to understand how to meaningfully engage survivors of modern slavery as co-researchers. Inclusion was at the heart of this research study, and thus, this paper was co-produced by survivors of modern slavery. Through their voices, and by engaging in reflexivity, we share the challenges of engaging in meaningful peer research methods, lessons learned as well as the benefits of adopting this approach to provide creative, engaging and empowering opportunities for participation in research and skill development. We share some examples of challenges and successes in our approach to understand what meaningful peer research methods look like, addressing conservative and more liberal views including academic expertise, safeguarding and empowerment. In concluding this paper, we provide some recommendations for best practice, recognising a continual need to reflect and adapt peer research approaches that suits the needs of the peer researchers as well as the subject to be studied. The overwhelming sentiment, is that social science research must look to engage in peer research methods, recognising the expertise of lived experience, and the potential for research to empower others while also creating meaningful change.
参与性行动研究:与受剥削的幸存者合作开展现代奴隶制研究
本文通过分享现代奴隶制幸存者作为积极项目顾问的经验,为参与行动研究(PAR)方法在现代奴隶制研究中提供最佳实践指导。通过使用参与式方法和参与行动学习集模型,本文旨在了解如何有意义地吸引现代奴隶制幸存者作为共同研究人员。包容是这项研究的核心,因此,这篇论文是由现代奴隶制的幸存者共同撰写的。通过他们的声音和参与反思,我们分享了采用有意义的同行研究方法的挑战、吸取的经验教训以及采用这种方法为参与研究和技能开发提供创造性、参与性和赋权机会的好处。我们分享了一些挑战和成功的例子,以了解有意义的同行研究方法是什么样子的,解决保守和更自由的观点,包括学术专业知识、保护和赋权。在本文的最后,我们为最佳实践提供了一些建议,认识到持续需要反映和适应同行研究方法,以适应同行研究人员和要研究的主题的需要。压倒性的观点是,社会科学研究必须寻求参与同行研究方法,认识到生活经验的专业知识,以及研究在创造有意义的变化的同时赋予他人权力的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methodological Innovations
Methodological Innovations Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信