“I wouldn’t want you talking to my kids!”: the politics of age when conducting research about porn with young people

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Claire Meehan
{"title":"“I wouldn’t want you talking to my kids!”: the politics of age when conducting research about porn with young people","authors":"Claire Meehan","doi":"10.1080/14681811.2023.2251896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much research has been conducted on young people as a population rather than with them. Traditionally, porn research has focused on effects – on the assumption that people, especially young people, are impacted by the sexual media they consume, which leads to negative outcomes such as violence and addiction. In this sense, porn is framed as risky and children and young people become especially ‘at risk’. Sex, sexuality and sexual media are then portrayed as a threat from which young people should be protected. Nevertheless, for many young people watching porn is a normal activity and engaging with porn online is a part of everyday life for some teenagers. Scholars have indicated that many young people perceive porn as ubiquitous, as part of society, and difficult to avoid. In this reflexive article I will interrogate the need for such research, even if it is considered as a form of ‘dirty work’, within an alarmist and sensationalist media-driven culture. By examining my experiences of the ethics review process, access to participants, and the fieldwork itself, I hope to demonstrate moments of texture and detail throughout the process which future sex, sexuality and porn researchers can draw upon.","PeriodicalId":47510,"journal":{"name":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2023.2251896","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much research has been conducted on young people as a population rather than with them. Traditionally, porn research has focused on effects – on the assumption that people, especially young people, are impacted by the sexual media they consume, which leads to negative outcomes such as violence and addiction. In this sense, porn is framed as risky and children and young people become especially ‘at risk’. Sex, sexuality and sexual media are then portrayed as a threat from which young people should be protected. Nevertheless, for many young people watching porn is a normal activity and engaging with porn online is a part of everyday life for some teenagers. Scholars have indicated that many young people perceive porn as ubiquitous, as part of society, and difficult to avoid. In this reflexive article I will interrogate the need for such research, even if it is considered as a form of ‘dirty work’, within an alarmist and sensationalist media-driven culture. By examining my experiences of the ethics review process, access to participants, and the fieldwork itself, I hope to demonstrate moments of texture and detail throughout the process which future sex, sexuality and porn researchers can draw upon.
“我不想让你和我的孩子说话!”:对年轻人进行色情研究时的年龄政治
很多研究都是把年轻人作为一个整体而不是和他们一起进行的。传统上,色情研究的重点是影响——假设人们,尤其是年轻人,受到他们所消费的性媒体的影响,从而导致暴力和成瘾等负面结果。从这个意义上说,色情被认为是危险的,儿童和年轻人尤其“处于危险之中”。于是,性、性行为和性媒体被描绘成年轻人应该受到保护的威胁。然而,对于许多年轻人来说,看色情片是一种正常的活动,对一些青少年来说,上网看色情片是日常生活的一部分。学者们指出,许多年轻人认为色情无处不在,是社会的一部分,很难避免。在这篇反思性的文章中,我将质疑这种研究的必要性,即使它被认为是一种“肮脏的工作”,在一个危言耸听和耸人听闻的媒体驱动的文化中。通过检查我在伦理审查过程中的经历、与参与者的接触以及田野调查本身,我希望能展示出整个过程中的一些细节和细节,供未来的性、性和色情研究人员借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信