Julia D. Gusmoes, Rodrigo Garcia-Cerde, Juliana Y. Valente, Patrícia P. de O. Galvao, Zila M. Sanchez
{"title":"Why and how PROERD instructors adapt the program during its delivery: an implementation research","authors":"Julia D. Gusmoes, Rodrigo Garcia-Cerde, Juliana Y. Valente, Patrícia P. de O. Galvao, Zila M. Sanchez","doi":"10.1080/09687637.2023.2262098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractBackground The Drug and Violence Resistance Educational Program (Programa Educacional de Resistência às Drogas e à Violência – PROERD) is the most widely implemented prevention program in Brazil and this study evaluated the reasons and ways in which PROERD instructors change the program, affecting its implementation fidelity.Methods This qualitative method study used three data sources: semi-structured interviews with 19 police officers (PROERD instructors), fidelity forms completed by the instructors, and the researcher’s observations of 30 lessons, followed by thematic analysis.Results Strong evidence shows that instructors adapt the program, in general, because they experienced that some activities do not work when implemented as they were created by the developers. The main reasons to adapt the program were categorized into two groups: intrinsic and extrinsic reasons. The cultural reality and school performance of students and the support and infrastructure of the school were the extrinsic reasons, and instructors’ performance was the intrinsic reason.Conclusion In order to make PROERD feasible for students and schools, instructors change the program in an unstructured way, often not following the curriculum. Therefore, PROERD will hardly have a positive effect for Brazilian students.Keywords: Implementation fidelitypreventionmixed methodsadolescentschooldrugs AcknowledgementsWe thank the Military Police of the State of São Paulo, police officers, school directors, teachers, field researchers, and especially the students who participated in this study. We also thank Editage for English language editing.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis study was funded by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), under Grant No. 17-22300-7 (ZMS) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.","PeriodicalId":11367,"journal":{"name":"Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2023.2262098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractBackground The Drug and Violence Resistance Educational Program (Programa Educacional de Resistência às Drogas e à Violência – PROERD) is the most widely implemented prevention program in Brazil and this study evaluated the reasons and ways in which PROERD instructors change the program, affecting its implementation fidelity.Methods This qualitative method study used three data sources: semi-structured interviews with 19 police officers (PROERD instructors), fidelity forms completed by the instructors, and the researcher’s observations of 30 lessons, followed by thematic analysis.Results Strong evidence shows that instructors adapt the program, in general, because they experienced that some activities do not work when implemented as they were created by the developers. The main reasons to adapt the program were categorized into two groups: intrinsic and extrinsic reasons. The cultural reality and school performance of students and the support and infrastructure of the school were the extrinsic reasons, and instructors’ performance was the intrinsic reason.Conclusion In order to make PROERD feasible for students and schools, instructors change the program in an unstructured way, often not following the curriculum. Therefore, PROERD will hardly have a positive effect for Brazilian students.Keywords: Implementation fidelitypreventionmixed methodsadolescentschooldrugs AcknowledgementsWe thank the Military Police of the State of São Paulo, police officers, school directors, teachers, field researchers, and especially the students who participated in this study. We also thank Editage for English language editing.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis study was funded by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), under Grant No. 17-22300-7 (ZMS) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
摘要背景毒品和暴力抵抗教育计划(Programa Educacional de Resistência às Drogas e Violência - PROERD)是巴西实施最广泛的预防计划,本研究评估了PROERD教师改变计划的原因和方式,影响其实施的保原性。方法采用三种数据来源:对19名警官(PROERD指导员)的半结构化访谈、指导员填写的保真度表以及研究者对30节课的观察,然后进行专题分析。结果强有力的证据表明,通常情况下,教师会调整程序,因为他们经历了一些活动在由开发人员创建时无法实现。调整节目的主要原因可分为两类:内在原因和外在原因。学生的文化现实和学业表现以及学校的支持和基础设施是外在原因,教师的绩效是内在原因。为了使PROERD对学生和学校可行,教师以一种非结构化的方式改变程序,通常不遵循课程。因此,PROERD很难对巴西学生产生积极的影响。我们感谢圣保罗州军警、警察、学校领导、教师、实地研究人员,特别是参与本研究的学生。我们也感谢意得辑的英文编辑。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究由圣保罗州卫生保健基金会(FAPESP)根据第17-22300-7号拨款(ZMS)和Nível上级卫生保健基金会(ordindena de aperfei oamento de Pessoal de Superior)资助。
期刊介绍:
Drugs: education, prevention & policy is a refereed journal which aims to provide a forum for communication and debate between policy makers, practitioners and researchers concerned with social and health policy responses to legal and illicit drug use and drug-related harm. The journal publishes multi-disciplinary research papers, commentaries and reviews on policy, prevention and harm reduction issues regarding the use and misuse of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs. It is journal policy to encourage submissions which reflect different cultural, historical and theoretical approaches to the development of policy and practice.