Enhancing User Satisfaction in Indonesia’s e-wallet Market: A Comprehensive Analysis of Factors and Priorities

IF 4.3 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rahmat Nurcahyo, Anton Satria Prabuwono, Akmal Fatah Fainusa, Nurhadi Wibowo, Muhammad Habiburrahman, Khairi Hindriyandhito
{"title":"Enhancing User Satisfaction in Indonesia’s e-wallet Market: A Comprehensive Analysis of Factors and Priorities","authors":"Rahmat Nurcahyo, Anton Satria Prabuwono, Akmal Fatah Fainusa, Nurhadi Wibowo, Muhammad Habiburrahman, Khairi Hindriyandhito","doi":"10.1155/2023/8864865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on user satisfaction is crucial because it is the key to digital business success, including e-wallet in Indonesia which is experiencing very rapid growth. This study is aimed at determining the gap between e-wallet perception and user expectations, evaluating the level of user satisfaction among e-wallet, and determining the priority of improvement of the factors that affect e-wallet user satisfaction. Data processing is divided into four stages: Kano model, processing the comparison between user satisfaction data based on the gap in the value of perceptions and user expectations, processing of satisfaction gaps between e-wallet applications, and processing for multinomial logistic regression (MLR). To measure user satisfaction with a service, the concept of SERVQUAL, which consists of tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy, was used. Data were collected using online questionnaire distributed in the areas of Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, and Bekasi. The results of this study show that based on a comparison between users’ perceptions and expectations, the satisfaction gap value is negative. This shows that e-wallet users are not satisfied. The comparison of satisfaction gaps between e-wallet shows significant differences for security, efficiency, reliability, application display design, and economic benefit factors, whereas no significant difference is found for the customer service factor. This study provides the priority of improvement for each e-wallet provider. The novelty of this research is the priority for improvement that is derived from a combination of expectation and perception mapping, Kano’s model, and MLR. The findings could be used to increase the user satisfaction that can lead to the success of an e-wallet application.","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8864865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on user satisfaction is crucial because it is the key to digital business success, including e-wallet in Indonesia which is experiencing very rapid growth. This study is aimed at determining the gap between e-wallet perception and user expectations, evaluating the level of user satisfaction among e-wallet, and determining the priority of improvement of the factors that affect e-wallet user satisfaction. Data processing is divided into four stages: Kano model, processing the comparison between user satisfaction data based on the gap in the value of perceptions and user expectations, processing of satisfaction gaps between e-wallet applications, and processing for multinomial logistic regression (MLR). To measure user satisfaction with a service, the concept of SERVQUAL, which consists of tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy, was used. Data were collected using online questionnaire distributed in the areas of Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, and Bekasi. The results of this study show that based on a comparison between users’ perceptions and expectations, the satisfaction gap value is negative. This shows that e-wallet users are not satisfied. The comparison of satisfaction gaps between e-wallet shows significant differences for security, efficiency, reliability, application display design, and economic benefit factors, whereas no significant difference is found for the customer service factor. This study provides the priority of improvement for each e-wallet provider. The novelty of this research is the priority for improvement that is derived from a combination of expectation and perception mapping, Kano’s model, and MLR. The findings could be used to increase the user satisfaction that can lead to the success of an e-wallet application.
提高印尼电子钱包市场的用户满意度:综合因素和优先级分析
对用户满意度的研究是至关重要的,因为它是数字业务成功的关键,包括印度尼西亚的电子钱包,它正在经历非常快速的增长。本研究旨在确定电子钱包感知与用户期望之间的差距,评估用户对电子钱包的满意度水平,并确定影响电子钱包用户满意度因素的改善优先级。数据处理分为四个阶段:Kano模型,处理基于感知价值与用户期望差距的用户满意度数据之间的比较,处理电子钱包应用之间的满意度差距,以及处理多项逻辑回归(MLR)。为了测量用户对服务的满意度,使用了SERVQUAL的概念,它由有形、可靠性、响应性、保证和移情组成。数据是通过在雅加达、茂物、德波、丹格朗和勿加西地区分发的在线问卷收集的。本研究结果显示,基于用户感知与期望的比较,满意度差距值为负。这说明电子钱包用户并不满意。电子钱包满意度差距比较显示,安全性、效率、可靠性、应用显示设计和经济效益因素差异显著,而客户服务因素差异不显著。本研究为每个电子钱包供应商提供了改进的优先级。本研究的新颖之处在于改进的优先级,该改进来自于期望和感知映射、卡诺模型和MLR的结合。研究结果可以用来提高用户满意度,从而导致电子钱包应用程序的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信