Optimization of mining methods for deep orebody of large phosphate mines

IF 2.2 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Mengchao Xu, Di Hou, Xiaoshuang Li, Jiawen Wang, Menglai Wang, Shujian Li
{"title":"Optimization of mining methods for deep orebody of large phosphate mines","authors":"Mengchao Xu, Di Hou, Xiaoshuang Li, Jiawen Wang, Menglai Wang, Shujian Li","doi":"10.3389/fbuil.2023.1282684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Taking Yunnan Phosphate Group Co., Ltd. Kunyang Phosphate Mine No. 2 as the engineering background, this study aims to explore mining methods for deep ore bodies in phosphorus mines. Three mining schemes, namely open-pit mining, open-pit deep concave mining, and underground mining, were carefully selected for optimization. This article thoroughly analyzes the three schemes from various perspectives, including technical, economic, safety, and other aspects. Methods: The assessment of these aspects was conducted using the entropy weighted TOPSIS method. The technical aspects focused on evaluating the mining methods employed in each scheme. The economic aspects considered factors such as initial investment, resource recovery rate, phosphate content, production scale, infrastructure, and mining costs. Safety aspects took into account transportation safety and production safety. Additionally, the analysis considered environmental impact as one of the key factors. In total, 10 indicators were quantified to provide a comprehensive evaluation. To assess the schemes, the positive and negative ideal distances (D i + , D i − ) and the relative proximity (C i ) for open-pit mining, open-pit deep concave mining, and open-pit to underground mining were calculated. These calculations helped to determine the relative performance of each scheme. Results: The relative closeness values (C i ) for Scheme 1, Scheme 2, and Scheme 3 are determined as 1.00, 0.09, and 0.68, respectively.The evaluation results indicate that the relative closeness (C i ) for open-pit mining in Scheme 1 is 1.00, for open-pit deep concave mining in Scheme 2 is 0.09, and for underground mining in Scheme 3 is 0.68. Through comparison and analysis of these results, it can be concluded that open-pit mining is the most optimal method. However, considering the fact that the open-pit portion of Kunyang Phosphate Mine No. 2 has already been extensively mined, the study recommends underground mining as the best mining plan for the phosphate mine. Discussion: By applying the entropy weight TOPSIS method to underground mining, this study overcomes the challenge of transitioning from qualitative to quantitative analysis for selecting mining methods. The mathematical approach enables the presentation of optimal mining techniques in a more precise manner. Through comparison of relative closeness, an optimal solution can be selected. This method holds significant value not only for selecting suitable mining methods for phosphorus mines but also for choosing optimal solutions for underground mining methods, drainage, ventilation, and other relevant considerations.","PeriodicalId":37112,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Built Environment","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1282684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Taking Yunnan Phosphate Group Co., Ltd. Kunyang Phosphate Mine No. 2 as the engineering background, this study aims to explore mining methods for deep ore bodies in phosphorus mines. Three mining schemes, namely open-pit mining, open-pit deep concave mining, and underground mining, were carefully selected for optimization. This article thoroughly analyzes the three schemes from various perspectives, including technical, economic, safety, and other aspects. Methods: The assessment of these aspects was conducted using the entropy weighted TOPSIS method. The technical aspects focused on evaluating the mining methods employed in each scheme. The economic aspects considered factors such as initial investment, resource recovery rate, phosphate content, production scale, infrastructure, and mining costs. Safety aspects took into account transportation safety and production safety. Additionally, the analysis considered environmental impact as one of the key factors. In total, 10 indicators were quantified to provide a comprehensive evaluation. To assess the schemes, the positive and negative ideal distances (D i + , D i − ) and the relative proximity (C i ) for open-pit mining, open-pit deep concave mining, and open-pit to underground mining were calculated. These calculations helped to determine the relative performance of each scheme. Results: The relative closeness values (C i ) for Scheme 1, Scheme 2, and Scheme 3 are determined as 1.00, 0.09, and 0.68, respectively.The evaluation results indicate that the relative closeness (C i ) for open-pit mining in Scheme 1 is 1.00, for open-pit deep concave mining in Scheme 2 is 0.09, and for underground mining in Scheme 3 is 0.68. Through comparison and analysis of these results, it can be concluded that open-pit mining is the most optimal method. However, considering the fact that the open-pit portion of Kunyang Phosphate Mine No. 2 has already been extensively mined, the study recommends underground mining as the best mining plan for the phosphate mine. Discussion: By applying the entropy weight TOPSIS method to underground mining, this study overcomes the challenge of transitioning from qualitative to quantitative analysis for selecting mining methods. The mathematical approach enables the presentation of optimal mining techniques in a more precise manner. Through comparison of relative closeness, an optimal solution can be selected. This method holds significant value not only for selecting suitable mining methods for phosphorus mines but also for choosing optimal solutions for underground mining methods, drainage, ventilation, and other relevant considerations.
大型磷矿深部矿体采矿方法优化
简介:云南腾达磷业集团有限公司本研究以昆阳磷矿二矿为工程背景,探索磷矿深部矿体的开采方法。对露天开采、露天深凹开采和地下开采三种开采方案进行了优化。本文从技术、经济、安全等多个角度对三种方案进行了深入分析。方法:采用熵权TOPSIS法对各方面进行评价。技术方面的重点是评价每个方案所采用的采矿方法。经济方面考虑了初始投资、资源回收率、磷酸盐含量、生产规模、基础设施和采矿成本等因素。安全方面兼顾运输安全、生产安全。此外,分析认为环境影响是关键因素之一。共量化10个指标,进行综合评价。为了对方案进行评价,分别计算了露天矿开采、露天矿深凹开采和露天矿到地下开采的正、负理想距离(d1 +、d1 -)和相对接近度(c1)。这些计算有助于确定每种方案的相对性能。结果:方案1、方案2和方案3的相对接近值(C i)分别为1.00、0.09和0.68。评价结果表明,方案1露天开采的相对接近度(ci)为1.00,方案2露天深凹开采的相对接近度(ci)为0.09,方案3地下开采的相对接近度(ci)为0.68。通过对这些结果的比较和分析,可以得出露天开采是最优的方法。但考虑到昆阳磷矿2号露天部分已经进行了大量开采,研究建议将地下开采作为该矿的最佳开采方案。讨论:将熵权TOPSIS方法应用于地下开采,克服了采矿方法选择从定性分析向定量分析过渡的挑战。数学方法能够以更精确的方式呈现最佳采矿技术。通过相对接近度的比较,可以选择最优解。该方法不仅对磷矿开采方法的选择具有重要的指导意义,而且对地下开采方法、排水、通风等相关问题的优化求解具有重要的指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Built Environment
Frontiers in Built Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
266
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信