OHIP-5 FOR SCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN

IF 4.1 4区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101947

CIA SOLANKE , MIKE T JOHN , MARKUS EBEL , SARRA ALTNER , KATRIN BEKES

{"title":"OHIP-5 FOR SCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN","authors":"CIA SOLANKE , MIKE T JOHN , MARKUS EBEL , SARRA ALTNER , KATRIN BEKES","doi":"10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Different dental patient-reported outcome measures (dPROMs) exist for children and adults, leading to an incompatibility in outcome assessment in these 2 age groups. However, the dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs) Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact are the same in the 2 groups, providing an opportunity for compatible dPRO assessment if dPROMs were identical. Therefore, we adapted the 5-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5), a recommended dPROM for adults, to school-aged children to allow a standardized dPRO assessment in individuals aged 7 years and above.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>It was the aim of this study to develop a 5-item OHIP for school-aged children (OHIP-5<sub>School</sub>) and to investigate the instrument's score reliability and validity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>German-speaking children (N = 95, mean age: 8.6 years +/- 1.3 years, 55% girls) from the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria and a private dental practice in Bergisch Gladbach, Germany participated. The original OHIP-5 was modified and adapted for school going children aged 7-13 years and this modified version was termed OHIP-5<sub>School</sub>. It's score reliability was studied by determining scores’ internal consistency and temporal stability by calculating Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients, respectively. Construct validity was assessed comparing OHIP-5<sub>School</sub> scores with OHIP-5 as well as Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G<sub>8-10</sub>) scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Score reliability for the OHIP-5<sub>School</sub> was “good” (Cronbach's alpha: 0.81) or “excellent” (Intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.92). High correlations between OHIP-5<sub>School</sub>, OHIP-5, and CPQ-G<sub>8-10</sub> scores were observed and hypotheses about a pattern of these correlations were confirmed, providing evidence for score validity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The OHIP-5<sub>School</sub> and the original OHIP-5 are short and psychometrically sound instruments to measure the oral health related quality of life in school-aged children, providing an opportunity for a standardized oral health impact assessment with the same metric in school-aged children, adolescents, and adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":"Article 101947"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338223001434/pdfft?md5=c13106aa039e5f20702aae0eb08937d4&pid=1-s2.0-S1532338223001434-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338223001434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Different dental patient-reported outcome measures (dPROMs) exist for children and adults, leading to an incompatibility in outcome assessment in these 2 age groups. However, the dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs) Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact are the same in the 2 groups, providing an opportunity for compatible dPRO assessment if dPROMs were identical. Therefore, we adapted the 5-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5), a recommended dPROM for adults, to school-aged children to allow a standardized dPRO assessment in individuals aged 7 years and above.

Aim

It was the aim of this study to develop a 5-item OHIP for school-aged children (OHIP-5_School) and to investigate the instrument's score reliability and validity.

Methods

German-speaking children (N = 95, mean age: 8.6 years +/- 1.3 years, 55% girls) from the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria and a private dental practice in Bergisch Gladbach, Germany participated. The original OHIP-5 was modified and adapted for school going children aged 7-13 years and this modified version was termed OHIP-5_School. It's score reliability was studied by determining scores’ internal consistency and temporal stability by calculating Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients, respectively. Construct validity was assessed comparing OHIP-5_School scores with OHIP-5 as well as Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G_8-10) scores.

Results

Score reliability for the OHIP-5_School was “good” (Cronbach's alpha: 0.81) or “excellent” (Intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.92). High correlations between OHIP-5_School, OHIP-5, and CPQ-G_8-10 scores were observed and hypotheses about a pattern of these correlations were confirmed, providing evidence for score validity.

Conclusion

The OHIP-5_School and the original OHIP-5 are short and psychometrically sound instruments to measure the oral health related quality of life in school-aged children, providing an opportunity for a standardized oral health impact assessment with the same metric in school-aged children, adolescents, and adults.

查看原文本刊更多论文

学龄儿童的 ohip-5

背景儿童和成人有不同的牙科患者报告结果测量方法（dPROMs），导致这两个年龄组的结果评估不一致。然而，牙科患者报告的结果（dPROs）口腔功能、口腔疼痛、口腔外观和社会心理影响在这两个群体中是相同的，如果 dPROMs 相同，就有机会进行兼容的 dPRO 评估。因此，我们将推荐用于成人的 dPROM--5-项目口腔健康影响档案（OHIP-5）改编为学龄儿童口腔健康影响档案，以便对 7 岁及以上儿童进行标准化的 dPRO 评估。方法来自奥地利维也纳医科大学儿童牙科系和德国贝吉施格拉德巴赫一家私人牙科诊所的讲德语的儿童（95 人，平均年龄：8.6 岁 +/- 1.3 岁，55% 为女孩）参加了此次研究。原版 OHIP-5 经过修改后适用于 7-13 岁的在校儿童，修改后的版本被称为 OHIP-5School。通过计算 Cronbach's alpha 和类内相关系数来确定得分的内部一致性和时间稳定性，从而研究其得分可靠性。将 OHIP-5School 的得分与 OHIP-5 以及儿童认知问卷（CPQ-G8-10）的得分进行比较，评估其结构效度。结果 OHIP-5School 的得分信度为 "良好"（Cronbach's alpha：0.81）或 "优秀"（类内相关系数：0.92）。结论 OHIP-5School 和最初的 OHIP-5 是测量学龄儿童口腔健康相关生活质量的简短且符合心理测量学原理的工具，为在学龄儿童、青少年和成人中使用相同指标进行标准化口腔健康影响评估提供了机会。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

6.00

自引率

16.70%

发文量

105

审稿时长

28 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.