Valores normativos para el Cuestionario de Quejas Cognitivas para adultos entre 30 y 90 años

Q4 Medicine
Diana Bruno , Veronica Fernandez , Florencia Portillo , Solange Llarena Nuñez
{"title":"Valores normativos para el Cuestionario de Quejas Cognitivas para adultos entre 30 y 90 años","authors":"Diana Bruno ,&nbsp;Veronica Fernandez ,&nbsp;Florencia Portillo ,&nbsp;Solange Llarena Nuñez","doi":"10.1016/j.neuarg.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The Cognitive Complaints Questionnaire (CCQ) has proven to be a valid and reliable instrument according to expert judgment and concurrent validity analysis with objective measures, to assess people's cognitive complaints. This is important when considering them as a possible indicator of cognitive deterioration. In order to facilitate the interpretation and comparison of the results of the instrument, it is necessary not only that it present good psychometric properties, but also that it be standardized and regulated.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Generate normative values for the CCQ in a sample of adults between 30 and 90 years of age from Argentine.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects and method</h3><p>Quantitative approach of instrumental type. The sample included 230 healthy people, residents in Argentina, with no psychiatric or neurological history.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Correlations were observed between the CCQ and age and years of formal education, for this reason the normative values of the CCQ were organized by groups according to age and years of formal education. For age groups were divided into 2, one from 30 to 70 years and the other from 71 to 90 years. And for the years of formal education, 3 groups were formed: less than 7 years, between 7 and 15 years, and more than 15 years. The analysis of the psychometric properties once again yielded very good internal consistency and validity indices. Normative values are presented.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The CCQ is a useful instrument for exploring cognitive complaints.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39051,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia Argentina","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 271-278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia Argentina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1853002823000563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Cognitive Complaints Questionnaire (CCQ) has proven to be a valid and reliable instrument according to expert judgment and concurrent validity analysis with objective measures, to assess people's cognitive complaints. This is important when considering them as a possible indicator of cognitive deterioration. In order to facilitate the interpretation and comparison of the results of the instrument, it is necessary not only that it present good psychometric properties, but also that it be standardized and regulated.

Objective

Generate normative values for the CCQ in a sample of adults between 30 and 90 years of age from Argentine.

Subjects and method

Quantitative approach of instrumental type. The sample included 230 healthy people, residents in Argentina, with no psychiatric or neurological history.

Results

Correlations were observed between the CCQ and age and years of formal education, for this reason the normative values of the CCQ were organized by groups according to age and years of formal education. For age groups were divided into 2, one from 30 to 70 years and the other from 71 to 90 years. And for the years of formal education, 3 groups were formed: less than 7 years, between 7 and 15 years, and more than 15 years. The analysis of the psychometric properties once again yielded very good internal consistency and validity indices. Normative values are presented.

Conclusion

The CCQ is a useful instrument for exploring cognitive complaints.

30 至 90 岁成年人认知投诉问卷的标准值
导言:根据专家的判断和与客观测量方法的并行有效性分析,认知投诉问卷(CCQ)已被证明是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于评估人们的认知投诉。这对于将其视为认知功能衰退的可能指标非常重要。为了便于解释和比较该工具的结果,不仅需要该工具具有良好的心理测量特性,还需要对其进行标准化和规范化。结果观察到 CCQ 与年龄和正规教育年限之间存在相关性,因此根据年龄和正规教育年限对 CCQ 的标准值进行了分组。年龄组分为两组,一组为 30 至 70 岁,另一组为 71 至 90 岁。正规教育年限分为三组:少于 7 年、7 至 15 年和 15 年以上。心理测量特性分析再次得出了非常好的内部一致性和有效性指数。结论:CCQ 是研究认知投诉的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia Argentina
Neurologia Argentina Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Neurología Argentina es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Neurológica Argentina. Todos los artículos, publicados en español, son sometidos a un proceso de revisión sobre ciego por pares con la finalidad de ofrecer información original, relevante y de alta calidad que abarca todos los aspectos de la Neurología y la Neurociencia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信