{"title":"Reliability of Grayscale Value for Bone Density Determination in Oral Rehabilitation using Dental Implants","authors":"Shalu Rai, Deepankar Misra, Akansha Misra, Himanshi Tomar, Ayush Dhawan, Rohit Gupta","doi":"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_3_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Quality and quantity of jaw bones have been previously classified in literature using different methods. Imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), successfully determine bone density of jaws. This study aims to establish the role of cone-beam CT (CBCT) in determining the density of cortical and cancellous bones at different jaw sites. Materials and Methods: Eighty-three possible implant sites in healthy patients were evaluated using NewTomGiano CBCT machine. Cross-sections were obtained and cortical and cancellous bone densities on different aspects of the virtual implant in terms of Hounsfield unit (HU) were determined using New Net Technologies software version 6.1 and were classified according to software from D1 to D4. Data were entered into SPSS software (version 19.0) and were statistically analyzed. Results: The mean HU showed the highest value for cortical and cancellous in the anterior mandible (mean HU 1874.01 and 1131.73, respectively) followed by the posterior mandible (mean HU 1789.20 and 872.95, respectively) and least in posterior maxilla (mean HU 1068.26 and 830.04, respectively). Maximum D1 bone type was found in cortical bone and D2 bone type was noted in cancellous bone area. Males showed very highly significant cortical bone thickness ( P < 0.001) whereas females showed more cancellous bone thickness but the results were nonsignificant. Conclusion: A high degree of concordance between different regions of jaw bones with a strong correlation between the four bone types was obtained. Bone density plays a pivotal role in determining the prognosis of the implant. CBCT has proven to be beneficial in bone density analysis.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_3_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Quality and quantity of jaw bones have been previously classified in literature using different methods. Imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), successfully determine bone density of jaws. This study aims to establish the role of cone-beam CT (CBCT) in determining the density of cortical and cancellous bones at different jaw sites. Materials and Methods: Eighty-three possible implant sites in healthy patients were evaluated using NewTomGiano CBCT machine. Cross-sections were obtained and cortical and cancellous bone densities on different aspects of the virtual implant in terms of Hounsfield unit (HU) were determined using New Net Technologies software version 6.1 and were classified according to software from D1 to D4. Data were entered into SPSS software (version 19.0) and were statistically analyzed. Results: The mean HU showed the highest value for cortical and cancellous in the anterior mandible (mean HU 1874.01 and 1131.73, respectively) followed by the posterior mandible (mean HU 1789.20 and 872.95, respectively) and least in posterior maxilla (mean HU 1068.26 and 830.04, respectively). Maximum D1 bone type was found in cortical bone and D2 bone type was noted in cancellous bone area. Males showed very highly significant cortical bone thickness ( P < 0.001) whereas females showed more cancellous bone thickness but the results were nonsignificant. Conclusion: A high degree of concordance between different regions of jaw bones with a strong correlation between the four bone types was obtained. Bone density plays a pivotal role in determining the prognosis of the implant. CBCT has proven to be beneficial in bone density analysis.