Comparison of Pain Management of Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients who applied to the Emergency Department with Acute Pain

Emre Şancı
{"title":"Comparison of Pain Management of Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients who applied to the Emergency Department with Acute Pain","authors":"Emre Şancı","doi":"10.14744/scie.2023.58234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Pain is the most common reason for the emergency department (ED) visits of geriatric patients. Pain management might be challenging in this age group of patients which may spur delays in pain treatment and oligoanalgesia. In addition, failure to provide effective pain control in geriatric patients can lead to delirium, depression, and prolonged hospital stay. The aim of the study was to compare the changes in pain scores of geriatric and non-geriatric patients in the first 60 min who applied to the ED with acute pain. Methods: This prospective study was conducted between January 2022 and March 2022 in an academic ED. All patients older than 18 years old who presented with acute pain were enrolled in the study. The primary outcome measure of the study was determined as the alteration in pain levels between geriatric and non-geriatric groups at the visual analog scale (VAS) at 0–60th min. The secondary outcome measures of the study were to determine the opioid doses between the two groups and the alteration in pain levels between the two groups at the VAS at 0–20th min and 0–40th min. Results: The change in pain levels did not differ significantly between the groups at 0–60th, 0–20th, and 0–40th min. Opioid doses were also not significantly different among the two groups. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that oligoanagesia is not a significant risk neither for geriatric nor for non-geriatric patients in the ED population. ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":33982,"journal":{"name":"Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/scie.2023.58234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pain is the most common reason for the emergency department (ED) visits of geriatric patients. Pain management might be challenging in this age group of patients which may spur delays in pain treatment and oligoanalgesia. In addition, failure to provide effective pain control in geriatric patients can lead to delirium, depression, and prolonged hospital stay. The aim of the study was to compare the changes in pain scores of geriatric and non-geriatric patients in the first 60 min who applied to the ED with acute pain. Methods: This prospective study was conducted between January 2022 and March 2022 in an academic ED. All patients older than 18 years old who presented with acute pain were enrolled in the study. The primary outcome measure of the study was determined as the alteration in pain levels between geriatric and non-geriatric groups at the visual analog scale (VAS) at 0–60th min. The secondary outcome measures of the study were to determine the opioid doses between the two groups and the alteration in pain levels between the two groups at the VAS at 0–20th min and 0–40th min. Results: The change in pain levels did not differ significantly between the groups at 0–60th, 0–20th, and 0–40th min. Opioid doses were also not significantly different among the two groups. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that oligoanagesia is not a significant risk neither for geriatric nor for non-geriatric patients in the ED population. ABSTRACT
急性疼痛申请急诊科的老年和非老年患者疼痛处理的比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信