Educational technology for reading instruction in developing countries: A systematic literature review

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Andrea Norman
{"title":"Educational technology for reading instruction in developing countries: A systematic literature review","authors":"Andrea Norman","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite significant initiatives to improve education globally, policy makers and researchers are concerned about literacy outcomes in developing countries, as students lack basic literacy skills even after many years in schooling. Educational technology has been championed as a potential solution to low‐quality education in developing countries, yet little rigorous research on this topic exists. Since Covid‐19 has caused enormous global disruption and teachers have been forced to adopt technology globally, research into the effectiveness of using technology for teaching literacy in low‐income contexts is vital. This systematic review of the literature analyses and synthesises the range of international research available on educational technology to improve reading in developing countries. This review includes primary qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, which were analysed using thematic synthesis. The review concludes that there is some suggestive evidence that reasons for the success of educational technology literacy interventions may include ongoing teacher professional development, interactive multimedia features, and a focus on phonics and progressive reading skills. The current limited research base supports technology designs that are adaptive, engaging, and child‐centred, utilising software that can differentiate for students' levels. Engaging the community using context‐specific resources and incorporating the technology into a broader literacy programme and pedagogy, were also features highlighted in multiple studies. However, with a limited number of studies the strength of the evidence is weak; therefore, definitive conclusions cannot be made. The findings provide some suggestive evidence that could guide future research. Context and implications Rationale for this study This systematic review addresses the gap in current research into which types of educational technology are effective for the teaching of reading in developing countries. By synthesising the findings of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies, this review presents tentative recommendations for policy makers and future research. Why the new findings matter The findings present specific features of effective educational technologies that could be used by policy makers to improve literacy outcomes. This is directly relevant for the millions of students in developing countries who lack literacy skills even after many years in school. Educational technology is widely used and promoted as a solution for improving educational or literacy outcomes in developing countries, yet little rigorous research exists. This systematic review addresses this by synthesising existing research and highlighting areas for future research. Since Covid‐19 caused teachers to adopt technology globally, research into the effectiveness of using technology for teaching literacy in low‐income contexts is vital. Implications for research and practice This systematic review synthesises current research so that policy makers have guidelines when designing interventions. The review provides a comprehensive map of existing literature and gaps for researchers. Based on the findings from this systematic review, policy makers are encouraged to consider how technology engages students through multimedia and interactive features, is adapted to the local context and language, and is differentiated to students' different ability levels. Policy makers should also consider how technology supports student learning through the scaffolding of specific reading skills with a holistic connection to a broader literacy programme, teacher training and the local curriculum. Since little quality data exists in this area, these recommendations for policy are tentative, and it is recommended future research further explore some of the promising features that were found in numerous successful interventions.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Despite significant initiatives to improve education globally, policy makers and researchers are concerned about literacy outcomes in developing countries, as students lack basic literacy skills even after many years in schooling. Educational technology has been championed as a potential solution to low‐quality education in developing countries, yet little rigorous research on this topic exists. Since Covid‐19 has caused enormous global disruption and teachers have been forced to adopt technology globally, research into the effectiveness of using technology for teaching literacy in low‐income contexts is vital. This systematic review of the literature analyses and synthesises the range of international research available on educational technology to improve reading in developing countries. This review includes primary qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, which were analysed using thematic synthesis. The review concludes that there is some suggestive evidence that reasons for the success of educational technology literacy interventions may include ongoing teacher professional development, interactive multimedia features, and a focus on phonics and progressive reading skills. The current limited research base supports technology designs that are adaptive, engaging, and child‐centred, utilising software that can differentiate for students' levels. Engaging the community using context‐specific resources and incorporating the technology into a broader literacy programme and pedagogy, were also features highlighted in multiple studies. However, with a limited number of studies the strength of the evidence is weak; therefore, definitive conclusions cannot be made. The findings provide some suggestive evidence that could guide future research. Context and implications Rationale for this study This systematic review addresses the gap in current research into which types of educational technology are effective for the teaching of reading in developing countries. By synthesising the findings of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies, this review presents tentative recommendations for policy makers and future research. Why the new findings matter The findings present specific features of effective educational technologies that could be used by policy makers to improve literacy outcomes. This is directly relevant for the millions of students in developing countries who lack literacy skills even after many years in school. Educational technology is widely used and promoted as a solution for improving educational or literacy outcomes in developing countries, yet little rigorous research exists. This systematic review addresses this by synthesising existing research and highlighting areas for future research. Since Covid‐19 caused teachers to adopt technology globally, research into the effectiveness of using technology for teaching literacy in low‐income contexts is vital. Implications for research and practice This systematic review synthesises current research so that policy makers have guidelines when designing interventions. The review provides a comprehensive map of existing literature and gaps for researchers. Based on the findings from this systematic review, policy makers are encouraged to consider how technology engages students through multimedia and interactive features, is adapted to the local context and language, and is differentiated to students' different ability levels. Policy makers should also consider how technology supports student learning through the scaffolding of specific reading skills with a holistic connection to a broader literacy programme, teacher training and the local curriculum. Since little quality data exists in this area, these recommendations for policy are tentative, and it is recommended future research further explore some of the promising features that were found in numerous successful interventions.
发展中国家阅读教学的教育技术:系统的文献综述
尽管在全球范围内采取了重大举措来改善教育,但政策制定者和研究人员对发展中国家的扫盲结果感到担忧,因为学生在接受多年教育后仍缺乏基本的扫盲技能。教育技术被认为是发展中国家低质量教育的潜在解决方案,但这方面的严谨研究很少。由于Covid - 19造成了巨大的全球破坏,教师被迫在全球范围内采用技术,因此研究在低收入背景下使用技术进行扫盲教学的有效性至关重要。本文对文献进行了系统回顾,分析并综合了有关提高发展中国家阅读能力的教育技术的国际研究范围。本综述包括主要的定性、定量和混合方法研究,并采用专题综合方法进行分析。这篇综述的结论是,有一些暗示性的证据表明,教育技术素养干预成功的原因可能包括教师持续的专业发展、交互式多媒体功能、对自然拼读法和渐进式阅读技能的关注。目前有限的研究基地支持适应性强、引人入胜、以儿童为中心的技术设计,利用能够区分学生水平的软件。利用特定环境的资源吸引社区参与,并将技术纳入更广泛的扫盲计划和教学方法,也是多项研究强调的特点。然而,由于研究数量有限,证据的强度很弱;因此,不能作出明确的结论。这些发现为指导未来的研究提供了一些有启发性的证据。本研究的背景和含义本研究的基本原理本系统综述解决了目前关于哪些类型的教育技术对发展中国家的阅读教学有效的研究中的空白。通过综合定性、定量和混合方法的初步研究结果,本综述为政策制定者和未来的研究提出了初步建议。这些发现展示了有效教育技术的具体特征,政策制定者可以利用这些特征来提高扫盲结果。这直接关系到发展中国家数以百万计的学生,即使在学校学习多年,他们仍然缺乏读写技能。在发展中国家,教育技术作为改善教育或扫盲成果的解决方案被广泛使用和推广,但很少有严谨的研究。本系统综述通过综合现有研究和突出未来研究领域来解决这一问题。由于Covid - 19导致教师在全球范围内采用技术,因此研究在低收入背景下使用技术进行扫盲教学的有效性至关重要。本系统综述综合了当前的研究,以便政策制定者在设计干预措施时具有指导方针。该综述为研究人员提供了现有文献和空白的全面地图。基于这一系统综述的发现,鼓励政策制定者考虑技术如何通过多媒体和互动功能吸引学生,如何适应当地环境和语言,以及如何根据学生的不同能力水平进行区分。决策者还应考虑技术如何通过特定阅读技能的框架来支持学生的学习,并将其与更广泛的扫盲计划、教师培训和当地课程整体联系起来。由于这一领域的高质量数据很少,这些政策建议是试探性的,建议未来的研究进一步探索在许多成功干预措施中发现的一些有希望的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Review of Education
Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信