{"title":"Newton Makes Me Happy: Cycling Emotions during Science Text Reading","authors":"Brian W. Miller","doi":"10.1080/00220973.2023.2262814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractSome researchers have theorized that emotions while reading science texts influence learning in a wholistic way, such that overall positive or negative affect leads to different learning outcomes. Other researchers have envisioned that emotions fluctuate during reading such that the degree of cycling impacts the learning outcomes. In this study, participants read both expository and refutational science texts sentence-by-sentence. They described how each sentence made them feel and why. They completed the Force Concept Inventory before and after reading. The amount of positive emotions predicted conceptual growth for both types of texts. Students who tended to switch their emotions more often and had a variety of emotions also tended to learn more than other students. These results suggest that both types of theories could be true. An overall positive affect might be best, but the most effective students cycle through short periods of negative emotions as well.Keywords: emotionacademic emotionsscience educationscience readingemote-aloud AcknowledgmentsSpecial thanks to Dr. Cody Sandifer.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 I am not including the most prominent theory in this field, the Control Value Theory of Academic Emotions (Pekrun & Perry, Citation2014), because it is not a theory of the interaction between emotions and learning but rather a theory explaining the antecedents of academic emotions.","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2023.2262814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractSome researchers have theorized that emotions while reading science texts influence learning in a wholistic way, such that overall positive or negative affect leads to different learning outcomes. Other researchers have envisioned that emotions fluctuate during reading such that the degree of cycling impacts the learning outcomes. In this study, participants read both expository and refutational science texts sentence-by-sentence. They described how each sentence made them feel and why. They completed the Force Concept Inventory before and after reading. The amount of positive emotions predicted conceptual growth for both types of texts. Students who tended to switch their emotions more often and had a variety of emotions also tended to learn more than other students. These results suggest that both types of theories could be true. An overall positive affect might be best, but the most effective students cycle through short periods of negative emotions as well.Keywords: emotionacademic emotionsscience educationscience readingemote-aloud AcknowledgmentsSpecial thanks to Dr. Cody Sandifer.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 I am not including the most prominent theory in this field, the Control Value Theory of Academic Emotions (Pekrun & Perry, Citation2014), because it is not a theory of the interaction between emotions and learning but rather a theory explaining the antecedents of academic emotions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.