Newton Makes Me Happy: Cycling Emotions during Science Text Reading

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Brian W. Miller
{"title":"Newton Makes Me Happy: Cycling Emotions during Science Text Reading","authors":"Brian W. Miller","doi":"10.1080/00220973.2023.2262814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractSome researchers have theorized that emotions while reading science texts influence learning in a wholistic way, such that overall positive or negative affect leads to different learning outcomes. Other researchers have envisioned that emotions fluctuate during reading such that the degree of cycling impacts the learning outcomes. In this study, participants read both expository and refutational science texts sentence-by-sentence. They described how each sentence made them feel and why. They completed the Force Concept Inventory before and after reading. The amount of positive emotions predicted conceptual growth for both types of texts. Students who tended to switch their emotions more often and had a variety of emotions also tended to learn more than other students. These results suggest that both types of theories could be true. An overall positive affect might be best, but the most effective students cycle through short periods of negative emotions as well.Keywords: emotionacademic emotionsscience educationscience readingemote-aloud AcknowledgmentsSpecial thanks to Dr. Cody Sandifer.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 I am not including the most prominent theory in this field, the Control Value Theory of Academic Emotions (Pekrun & Perry, Citation2014), because it is not a theory of the interaction between emotions and learning but rather a theory explaining the antecedents of academic emotions.","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2023.2262814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractSome researchers have theorized that emotions while reading science texts influence learning in a wholistic way, such that overall positive or negative affect leads to different learning outcomes. Other researchers have envisioned that emotions fluctuate during reading such that the degree of cycling impacts the learning outcomes. In this study, participants read both expository and refutational science texts sentence-by-sentence. They described how each sentence made them feel and why. They completed the Force Concept Inventory before and after reading. The amount of positive emotions predicted conceptual growth for both types of texts. Students who tended to switch their emotions more often and had a variety of emotions also tended to learn more than other students. These results suggest that both types of theories could be true. An overall positive affect might be best, but the most effective students cycle through short periods of negative emotions as well.Keywords: emotionacademic emotionsscience educationscience readingemote-aloud AcknowledgmentsSpecial thanks to Dr. Cody Sandifer.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 I am not including the most prominent theory in this field, the Control Value Theory of Academic Emotions (Pekrun & Perry, Citation2014), because it is not a theory of the interaction between emotions and learning but rather a theory explaining the antecedents of academic emotions.
牛顿让我快乐:阅读科学文本时的情绪循环
摘要一些研究者认为,阅读科学文本时的情绪对学习的影响是整体性的,整体的积极或消极情绪会导致不同的学习结果。其他研究人员设想,在阅读过程中,情绪波动的程度会影响学习结果。在这项研究中,参与者逐句阅读说明性和反驳性的科学文本。他们描述了每个句子带给他们的感受以及原因。他们在阅读之前和之后都完成了“部队概念清单”。积极情绪的数量预测了两种类型文本的概念增长。情绪变化更频繁、情绪多变的学生也往往比其他学生学得更多。这些结果表明,这两种理论都可能是正确的。整体的积极影响可能是最好的,但最有效的学生也会在短时间的消极情绪中循环。关键词:情感学术情感科学教育科学阅读鸣谢特别感谢科迪·桑德弗博士披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1我没有包括这个领域最突出的理论——学术情绪控制价值理论(Pekrun & Perry, Citation2014),因为它不是一个关于情绪和学习之间相互作用的理论,而是一个解释学术情绪前因的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信