Adaptation and preliminary validation of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) using the Structured Interview Guide (SIGMA) for European Portuguese

IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Raquel Guiomar, Sara Samarra, Mariana Rodrigues, Andreia Martins, Vera Martins, Mariana Jesus, Filipe Fernandes, Inês Alves, Tânia Silva, Ana Ganho-Ávila
{"title":"Adaptation and preliminary validation of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) using the Structured Interview Guide (SIGMA) for European Portuguese","authors":"Raquel Guiomar, Sara Samarra, Mariana Rodrigues, Andreia Martins, Vera Martins, Mariana Jesus, Filipe Fernandes, Inês Alves, Tânia Silva, Ana Ganho-Ávila","doi":"10.14195/1647-8606_66_3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is considered one of the gold-standard measures to assess depression severity. To standardise the MADRS administration, a structured interview was developed (SIGMA). This study aims to translate and validate the SIGMA for European Portuguese. Twenty patients (80% women) were interviewed by ten dyads of raters (trained clinical psychologists and psychiatrists) using the European Portuguese version of the MADRS and its structured interview SIGMA. There was no significant difference in the total MADRS score between raters (interviewers and observers). The intraclass correlation for the total score between raters using the SIGMA was excellent (r = .98; p < .001). All items had excellent to good item-level intraclass correlation, and the internal consistency by rater role was good. The European Portuguese version of the SIGMA showed good preliminary psychometric properties (reliability and internal consistency). Our results suggest that the SIGMA is a useful and robust interview guide for assessing the ten depression symptoms in the MADRS, regardless of the rater clinical background.","PeriodicalId":45571,"journal":{"name":"Psychologia","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_66_3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is considered one of the gold-standard measures to assess depression severity. To standardise the MADRS administration, a structured interview was developed (SIGMA). This study aims to translate and validate the SIGMA for European Portuguese. Twenty patients (80% women) were interviewed by ten dyads of raters (trained clinical psychologists and psychiatrists) using the European Portuguese version of the MADRS and its structured interview SIGMA. There was no significant difference in the total MADRS score between raters (interviewers and observers). The intraclass correlation for the total score between raters using the SIGMA was excellent (r = .98; p < .001). All items had excellent to good item-level intraclass correlation, and the internal consistency by rater role was good. The European Portuguese version of the SIGMA showed good preliminary psychometric properties (reliability and internal consistency). Our results suggest that the SIGMA is a useful and robust interview guide for assessing the ten depression symptoms in the MADRS, regardless of the rater clinical background.
运用结构化访谈指南(SIGMA)对欧洲葡萄牙人进行Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)的调整与初步验证
蒙哥马利-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)被认为是评估抑郁严重程度的黄金标准之一。为了使MADRS管理标准化,开发了结构化访谈(SIGMA)。本研究旨在翻译和验证欧洲葡萄牙语的SIGMA。20名患者(80%为女性)由10对评分者(训练有素的临床心理学家和精神科医生)使用欧洲葡萄牙语版MADRS及其结构化访谈SIGMA进行访谈。评价者(访谈者和观察者)的MADRS总分无显著差异。使用SIGMA的评分者之间的总分的类内相关性很好(r = 0.98;p & lt;措施)。所有条目具有极优至良好的条目级内相关性,并且由评分者扮演的内部一致性较好。欧洲葡萄牙语版本的SIGMA显示出良好的初步心理测量特性(信度和内部一致性)。我们的研究结果表明,无论临床背景如何,SIGMA都是评估MADRS中10种抑郁症状的有用且可靠的访谈指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychologia
Psychologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信