A state-of-the-art appraisal of bankruptcy prediction models focussing on the field’s core authors: 2010–2022

IF 1.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Ivan Soukal, Jan Mačí, Gabriela Trnková, Libuse Svobodova, Martina Hedvičáková, Eva Hamplova, Petra Maresova, Frank Lefley
{"title":"A state-of-the-art appraisal of bankruptcy prediction models focussing on the field’s core authors: 2010–2022","authors":"Ivan Soukal, Jan Mačí, Gabriela Trnková, Libuse Svobodova, Martina Hedvičáková, Eva Hamplova, Petra Maresova, Frank Lefley","doi":"10.1108/cemj-08-2022-0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The primary purpose of this paper is to identify the so-called core authors and their publications according to pre-defined criteria and thereby direct the users to the fastest and easiest way to get a picture of the otherwise pervasive field of bankruptcy prediction models. The authors aim to present state-of-the-art bankruptcy prediction models assembled by the field's core authors and critically examine the approaches and methods adopted. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a literature search in November 2022 through scientific databases Scopus, ScienceDirect and the Web of Science, focussing on a publication period from 2010 to 2022. The database search query was formulated as “Bankruptcy Prediction” and “Model or Tool”. However, the authors intentionally did not specify any model or tool to make the search non-discriminatory. The authors reviewed over 7,300 articles. Findings This paper has addressed the research questions: (1) What are the most important publications of the core authors in terms of the target country, size of the sample, sector of the economy and specialization in SME? (2) What are the most used methods for deriving or adjusting models appearing in the articles of the core authors? (3) To what extent do the core authors include accounting-based variables, non-financial or macroeconomic indicators, in their prediction models? Despite the advantages of new-age methods, based on the information in the articles analyzed, it can be deduced that conventional methods will continue to be beneficial, mainly due to the higher degree of ease of use and the transferability of the derived model. Research limitations/implications The authors identify several gaps in the literature which this research does not address but could be the focus of future research. Practical implications The authors provide practitioners and academics with an extract from a wide range of studies, available in scientific databases, on bankruptcy prediction models or tools, resulting in a large number of records being reviewed. This research will interest shareholders, corporations, and financial institutions interested in models of financial distress prediction or bankruptcy prediction to help identify troubled firms in the early stages of distress. Social implications Bankruptcy is a major concern for society in general, especially in today's economic environment. Therefore, being able to predict possible business failure at an early stage will give an organization time to address the issue and maybe avoid bankruptcy. Originality/value To the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper to identify the core authors in the bankruptcy prediction model and methods field. The primary value of the study is the current overview and analysis of the theoretical and practical development of knowledge in this field in the form of the construction of new models using classical or new-age methods. Also, the paper adds value by critically examining existing models and their modifications, including a discussion of the benefits of non-accounting variables usage.","PeriodicalId":40276,"journal":{"name":"Central European Management Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cemj-08-2022-0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The primary purpose of this paper is to identify the so-called core authors and their publications according to pre-defined criteria and thereby direct the users to the fastest and easiest way to get a picture of the otherwise pervasive field of bankruptcy prediction models. The authors aim to present state-of-the-art bankruptcy prediction models assembled by the field's core authors and critically examine the approaches and methods adopted. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a literature search in November 2022 through scientific databases Scopus, ScienceDirect and the Web of Science, focussing on a publication period from 2010 to 2022. The database search query was formulated as “Bankruptcy Prediction” and “Model or Tool”. However, the authors intentionally did not specify any model or tool to make the search non-discriminatory. The authors reviewed over 7,300 articles. Findings This paper has addressed the research questions: (1) What are the most important publications of the core authors in terms of the target country, size of the sample, sector of the economy and specialization in SME? (2) What are the most used methods for deriving or adjusting models appearing in the articles of the core authors? (3) To what extent do the core authors include accounting-based variables, non-financial or macroeconomic indicators, in their prediction models? Despite the advantages of new-age methods, based on the information in the articles analyzed, it can be deduced that conventional methods will continue to be beneficial, mainly due to the higher degree of ease of use and the transferability of the derived model. Research limitations/implications The authors identify several gaps in the literature which this research does not address but could be the focus of future research. Practical implications The authors provide practitioners and academics with an extract from a wide range of studies, available in scientific databases, on bankruptcy prediction models or tools, resulting in a large number of records being reviewed. This research will interest shareholders, corporations, and financial institutions interested in models of financial distress prediction or bankruptcy prediction to help identify troubled firms in the early stages of distress. Social implications Bankruptcy is a major concern for society in general, especially in today's economic environment. Therefore, being able to predict possible business failure at an early stage will give an organization time to address the issue and maybe avoid bankruptcy. Originality/value To the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper to identify the core authors in the bankruptcy prediction model and methods field. The primary value of the study is the current overview and analysis of the theoretical and practical development of knowledge in this field in the form of the construction of new models using classical or new-age methods. Also, the paper adds value by critically examining existing models and their modifications, including a discussion of the benefits of non-accounting variables usage.
破产预测模型的最先进的评估集中在该领域的核心作者:2010-2022
本文的主要目的是根据预先定义的标准确定所谓的核心作者及其出版物,从而指导用户以最快和最简单的方式了解破产预测模型的其他普遍领域。作者旨在呈现由该领域核心作者组装的最先进的破产预测模型,并严格检查所采用的方法和方法。作者于2022年11月通过科学数据库Scopus、ScienceDirect和Web of Science进行了文献检索,重点关注2010年至2022年的出版期。将数据库搜索查询表述为“破产预测”和“模型或工具”。然而,作者故意没有指定任何模型或工具,使搜索无歧视性。作者审查了7300多篇文章。本文解决了研究问题:(1)从目标国家、样本规模、经济部门和中小企业专业化角度来看,核心作者最重要的出版物是什么?(2)核心作者文章中出现的模型最常用的推导或调整方法是什么?(3)核心作者在其预测模型中纳入基于会计的变量、非金融或宏观经济指标的程度如何?尽管新时代方法具有优势,但根据所分析文章中的信息,可以推断,传统方法将继续有益,主要是由于更高程度的易用性和派生模型的可转移性。研究局限/启示作者指出了文献中的几个空白,这些空白本研究没有解决,但可能是未来研究的重点。作者为从业人员和学者提供了从科学数据库中可获得的关于破产预测模型或工具的广泛研究的摘录,从而对大量记录进行了审查。本研究将引起股东、公司和金融机构对财务困境预测或破产预测模型感兴趣,以帮助识别处于困境早期阶段的问题公司。破产是社会普遍关注的一个主要问题,特别是在当今的经济环境中。因此,能够在早期阶段预测可能的业务失败将为组织提供时间来解决问题,并可能避免破产。就作者所知,这是第一篇识别破产预测模型和方法领域核心作者的论文。该研究的主要价值在于以古典或新时代方法构建新模型的形式,对该领域知识的理论和实践发展进行当前的概述和分析。此外,本文通过严格检查现有模型及其修改来增加价值,包括讨论使用非会计变量的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信