Tracheostomy is associated with decreased in‐hospital mortality during severe COVID‐19 infection

Q2 Medicine
Ahab Alnemri, Kaley Ricciardelli, Stephanie Wang, Michael Baumgartner, Tiffany N. Chao
{"title":"Tracheostomy is associated with decreased in‐hospital mortality during severe COVID‐19 infection","authors":"Ahab Alnemri, Kaley Ricciardelli, Stephanie Wang, Michael Baumgartner, Tiffany N. Chao","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective Tracheostomy is often performed in patients with a prolonged course of endotracheal intubation. This study sought to examine the clinical utility of tracheostomy during severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection. Study Design A retrospective single‐system, multicenter observational cohort study was performed on patients intubated for COVID‐19 infection. Patients who received intubation alone were compared with patients who received intubation and subsequent tracheostomy. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital courses were analyzed. Setting The University of Pennsylvania Health System from 2020 to 2021. Methods Logistic regression analysis was performed on patient demographics and comorbidities. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated depending on whether patients received a tracheostomy. Results Of 777 intubated patients, 452 were male (58.2%) and 325 were female (41.8%) with a median age of 63 (interquartile range [IQR]: 54–73) years. One‐hundred and eighty‐five (23.8%) patients underwent tracheostomy. The mean time from intubation to tracheostomy was (17.3 ± 9.7) days. Patients who underwent tracheostomy were less likely to expire during their hospitalization than those who did not undergo tracheostomy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31, P < 0.001), and patient age was positively associated with mortality (OR = 1.04 per year, P < 0.001). Likelihood of receiving tracheostomy was positively associated with being on extra‐corporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) (OR = 101.10, P < 0.001), immunocompromised status (OR = 3.61, P = 0.002), and current tobacco smoking (OR = 4.81, P = 0.041). Tracheostomy was also associated with a significantly longer hospital length of stay ([57.5 ± 32.2] days vs. [19.9 ± 18.1] days, P < 0.001). Conclusions Tracheostomy was associated with reduced in‐hospital mortality, despite also being associated with increased comorbidities. Tracheostomy should not be held back from patients with comorbidities for this reason alone and may even improve survival in high‐risk patients.","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"277 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective Tracheostomy is often performed in patients with a prolonged course of endotracheal intubation. This study sought to examine the clinical utility of tracheostomy during severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection. Study Design A retrospective single‐system, multicenter observational cohort study was performed on patients intubated for COVID‐19 infection. Patients who received intubation alone were compared with patients who received intubation and subsequent tracheostomy. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital courses were analyzed. Setting The University of Pennsylvania Health System from 2020 to 2021. Methods Logistic regression analysis was performed on patient demographics and comorbidities. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated depending on whether patients received a tracheostomy. Results Of 777 intubated patients, 452 were male (58.2%) and 325 were female (41.8%) with a median age of 63 (interquartile range [IQR]: 54–73) years. One‐hundred and eighty‐five (23.8%) patients underwent tracheostomy. The mean time from intubation to tracheostomy was (17.3 ± 9.7) days. Patients who underwent tracheostomy were less likely to expire during their hospitalization than those who did not undergo tracheostomy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31, P < 0.001), and patient age was positively associated with mortality (OR = 1.04 per year, P < 0.001). Likelihood of receiving tracheostomy was positively associated with being on extra‐corporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) (OR = 101.10, P < 0.001), immunocompromised status (OR = 3.61, P = 0.002), and current tobacco smoking (OR = 4.81, P = 0.041). Tracheostomy was also associated with a significantly longer hospital length of stay ([57.5 ± 32.2] days vs. [19.9 ± 18.1] days, P < 0.001). Conclusions Tracheostomy was associated with reduced in‐hospital mortality, despite also being associated with increased comorbidities. Tracheostomy should not be held back from patients with comorbidities for this reason alone and may even improve survival in high‐risk patients.
气管切开术与严重COVID - 19感染期间住院死亡率降低相关
摘要目的气管切开术常用于气管插管疗程较长的患者。本研究旨在探讨2019年严重冠状病毒病(COVID - 19)感染期间气管切开术的临床应用。研究设计:一项回顾性单系统、多中心观察队列研究对插管治疗COVID - 19感染的患者进行了研究。将单独插管的患者与插管后气管切开术的患者进行比较。分析患者人口统计、合并症和住院疗程。设定宾夕法尼亚大学卫生系统从2020年到2021年方法对患者人口统计学和合并症进行Logistic回归分析。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线的生成取决于患者是否接受了气管切开术。结果777例插管患者中,男性452例(58.2%),女性325例(41.8%),中位年龄63岁(四分位间距[IQR]: 54 ~ 73)。185例(23.8%)患者接受了气管切开术。从插管到气管切开平均时间为(17.3±9.7)d。接受气管切开术的患者在住院期间死亡的可能性低于未接受气管切开术的患者(优势比[OR] = 0.31, P <0.001),患者年龄与死亡率呈正相关(OR = 1.04 /年,P <0.001)。接受气管切开术的可能性与体外膜氧合(ECMO)呈正相关(OR = 101.10, P <0.001)、免疫功能低下(OR = 3.61, P = 0.002)和当前吸烟(OR = 4.81, P = 0.041)。气管切开术也与住院时间显著延长相关([57.5±32.2]天比[19.9±18.1]天,P <0.001)。结论气管切开术与降低住院死亡率相关,尽管也与增加的合并症相关。气管切开术不应该仅仅因为这个原因而对有合并症的患者进行限制,甚至可以提高高风险患者的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信