Harnessing distributional semantics to build context-aware justifications for recommender systems

IF 3 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Cataldo Musto, Giuseppe Spillo, Giovanni Semeraro
{"title":"Harnessing distributional semantics to build context-aware justifications for recommender systems","authors":"Cataldo Musto, Giuseppe Spillo, Giovanni Semeraro","doi":"10.1007/s11257-023-09382-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper introduces a methodology to generate review-based natural language justifications supporting personalized suggestions returned by a recommender system. The hallmark of our strategy lies in the fact that natural language justifications are adapted to the different contextual situations in which the items will be consumed. In particular, our strategy relies on the following intuition: Just like the selection of the most suitable item is influenced by the contexts of usage, a justification that supports a recommendation should vary as well. As an example, depending on whether a person is going out with her friends or her family, a justification that supports a restaurant recommendation should include different concepts and aspects . Accordingly, we designed a pipeline based on distributional semantics models to generate a vector space representation of each context. Such a representation, which relies on a term-context matrix, is used to identify the most suitable review excerpts that discuss aspects that are particularly relevant for a certain context. The methodology was validated by means of two user studies, carried out in two different domains (i.e., movies and restaurants). Moreover, we also analyzed whether and how our justifications impact on the perceived transparency of the recommendation process and allow the user to make more informed choices. As shown by the results, our intuitions were supported by the user studies.","PeriodicalId":49388,"journal":{"name":"User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-023-09382-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper introduces a methodology to generate review-based natural language justifications supporting personalized suggestions returned by a recommender system. The hallmark of our strategy lies in the fact that natural language justifications are adapted to the different contextual situations in which the items will be consumed. In particular, our strategy relies on the following intuition: Just like the selection of the most suitable item is influenced by the contexts of usage, a justification that supports a recommendation should vary as well. As an example, depending on whether a person is going out with her friends or her family, a justification that supports a restaurant recommendation should include different concepts and aspects . Accordingly, we designed a pipeline based on distributional semantics models to generate a vector space representation of each context. Such a representation, which relies on a term-context matrix, is used to identify the most suitable review excerpts that discuss aspects that are particularly relevant for a certain context. The methodology was validated by means of two user studies, carried out in two different domains (i.e., movies and restaurants). Moreover, we also analyzed whether and how our justifications impact on the perceived transparency of the recommendation process and allow the user to make more informed choices. As shown by the results, our intuitions were supported by the user studies.

Abstract Image

利用分布式语义为推荐系统构建上下文感知的论证
摘要本文介绍了一种生成基于评论的自然语言证明的方法,该方法支持推荐系统返回的个性化建议。我们的策略的特点在于,自然语言的理由是适应不同的语境情况下,其中的项目将被消费。特别是,我们的策略依赖于以下直觉:就像选择最合适的项目受到使用上下文的影响一样,支持推荐的理由也应该有所不同。例如,根据一个人是和她的朋友还是家人出去,支持餐馆推荐的理由应该包括不同的概念和方面。因此,我们设计了一个基于分布式语义模型的管道来生成每个上下文的向量空间表示。这种表示依赖于术语-上下文矩阵,用于识别讨论与特定上下文特别相关的方面的最合适的审查摘要。该方法通过在两个不同领域(即电影和餐馆)进行的两项用户研究得到验证。此外,我们还分析了我们的理由是否以及如何影响推荐过程的感知透明度,并允许用户做出更明智的选择。结果表明,我们的直觉得到了用户研究的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction provides an interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of novel and significant original research results about interactive computer systems that can adapt themselves to their users, and on the design, use, and evaluation of user models for adaptation. The journal publishes high-quality original papers from, e.g., the following areas: acquisition and formal representation of user models; conceptual models and user stereotypes for personalization; student modeling and adaptive learning; models of groups of users; user model driven personalised information discovery and retrieval; recommender systems; adaptive user interfaces and agents; adaptation for accessibility and inclusion; generic user modeling systems and tools; interoperability of user models; personalization in areas such as; affective computing; ubiquitous and mobile computing; language based interactions; multi-modal interactions; virtual and augmented reality; social media and the Web; human-robot interaction; behaviour change interventions; personalized applications in specific domains; privacy, accountability, and security of information for personalization; responsible adaptation: fairness, accountability, explainability, transparency and control; methods for the design and evaluation of user models and adaptive systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信