Knowledge creation, knowledge impact and knowledge diffusion: how do they connect with higher education?

Q2 Social Sciences
Olena Dobrovolska, Ralph Sonntag, Susan Buschendorf, Elena Klimova, Wolfgang Ortmanns
{"title":"Knowledge creation, knowledge impact and knowledge diffusion: how do they connect with higher education?","authors":"Olena Dobrovolska, Ralph Sonntag, Susan Buschendorf, Elena Klimova, Wolfgang Ortmanns","doi":"10.21511/kpm.07(1).2023.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge-based economy causes changes in the higher education system: university graduates must have the ability to constantly learn and improve their skills, generate and disseminate new knowledge, form and multiply the knowledge capital of business. This paper aims to investigate a pairwise interconnection between higher education indicators and sets of parameters characterizing knowledge creation, impact, and diffusion. The following higher education indicators are used: expenditure on education, tertiary enrollment, graduates in science and engineering, tertiary inbound mobility, researcher, gross expenditure on R&D, top 3 global corporate R&D investors, top 3QS university ranking. Knowledge creation indicators are patents by origin, PCT patents by origin, utility models by origin, scientific and technical articles, citable documents, H-index. Knowledge impact is characterized through labor productivity growth, new businesses, software spending, ISO 9001 quality certificates, high-tech manufacturing. Knowledge diffusion parameters include intellectual property receipts, production and export complexity, high-tech exports, ICT services exports. The information base of the study is the data of the Global Innovation Index Report from the World Intellectual Property Organization for 40 European countries (selected depending on the availability of statistics) for 2022, research method – Canonical Correlation Analysis. The strongest positive correlation was found between higher education indicators and knowledge creation parameters. The second position takes connection between higher education indicators and knowledge diffusion parameters, the third – between higher education indicators and knowledge impact indicators. Among the higher education indicators, the most significant were gross expenditure on R&D, top 3 global corporate R&D investors, top 3 QS university ranking.","PeriodicalId":32855,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Performance Management","volume":"140 37","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Performance Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.07(1).2023.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge-based economy causes changes in the higher education system: university graduates must have the ability to constantly learn and improve their skills, generate and disseminate new knowledge, form and multiply the knowledge capital of business. This paper aims to investigate a pairwise interconnection between higher education indicators and sets of parameters characterizing knowledge creation, impact, and diffusion. The following higher education indicators are used: expenditure on education, tertiary enrollment, graduates in science and engineering, tertiary inbound mobility, researcher, gross expenditure on R&D, top 3 global corporate R&D investors, top 3QS university ranking. Knowledge creation indicators are patents by origin, PCT patents by origin, utility models by origin, scientific and technical articles, citable documents, H-index. Knowledge impact is characterized through labor productivity growth, new businesses, software spending, ISO 9001 quality certificates, high-tech manufacturing. Knowledge diffusion parameters include intellectual property receipts, production and export complexity, high-tech exports, ICT services exports. The information base of the study is the data of the Global Innovation Index Report from the World Intellectual Property Organization for 40 European countries (selected depending on the availability of statistics) for 2022, research method – Canonical Correlation Analysis. The strongest positive correlation was found between higher education indicators and knowledge creation parameters. The second position takes connection between higher education indicators and knowledge diffusion parameters, the third – between higher education indicators and knowledge impact indicators. Among the higher education indicators, the most significant were gross expenditure on R&D, top 3 global corporate R&D investors, top 3 QS university ranking.
知识创造、知识影响和知识扩散:如何与高等教育相联系?
知识经济引发了高等教育体系的变革:大学毕业生必须具备不断学习和提高技能、产生和传播新知识、形成和倍增企业知识资本的能力。本文旨在探讨高等教育指标与表征知识创造、影响和扩散的一系列参数之间的两两关联。以下高等教育指标:教育支出、高等教育招生、理工科毕业生、高等教育入境流动性、研究人员、研发总支出、全球前3大研发企业投资者、前3QS大学排名。知识创造指标为原产于专利、PCT原产于专利、实用新型原产于专利、科技文章、可引文献、h指数。知识影响的特征是劳动生产率增长、新业务、软件支出、ISO 9001质量证书和高科技制造业。知识扩散参数包括知识产权收入、生产和出口复杂性、高科技出口、信息通信技术服务出口。本研究的资料基础是世界知识产权组织的《全球创新指数报告》对40个欧洲国家(根据统计数据的可得性而选择)2022年的数据,研究方法-典型相关分析。高等教育指标与知识创造参数的正相关最强。第二个位置是高等教育指标与知识扩散参数之间的联系,第三个位置是高等教育指标与知识影响指标之间的联系。在高等教育指标中,最重要的是研发总支出、全球前3大企业研发投资者、QS前3大大学排名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Knowledge  Performance Management
Knowledge Performance Management Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信